scholarly journals Effect of Body Posture on Lung Ventilation and Oxygenation During Carbon Dioxide Pneumoperitoneum in Rabbit

Author(s):  
Iulia MELEGA ◽  
Cosmina DEJESCU ◽  
Mădălina DRAGOMIR ◽  
Cecilia DANCIU ◽  
Florica MATEI ◽  
...  

This study was conducted to investigate the influence of body position on respiratory compliance and oxygenation during iatrogenic pneumoperitoneum in the rabbit. The peak inspiratory pressure, dynamic compliance, static compliance and arterial gas parameters were calculated and measured 10 min before and 30 min after the creation of pneumoperitoneum with the patient in the horizontal position, 30 min after placing the patient in the Trendelenburg position and 30 min after placing the patient in the reversed Trendelenburg position. Following the creation of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning, there was a significant increase in peak inspiratory pressure while dynamic and static respiratory compliance decreased. Similarly, arterial oxygenation increased during Trendelenburg position while arterial carbon pressure remained within limits during all positions. Overall, the reverse Trendelenburg position did not improve ventilation, neither the oxygenation. However, this position showed to be more appropriate because may reduce the risk of lung injury associated with high-pressure ventilation during pneumoperitoneum.

2020 ◽  
Vol 318 (1) ◽  
pp. L78-L88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamila Moskowitzova ◽  
Arzoo Orfany ◽  
Kaifeng Liu ◽  
Giovanna Ramirez-Barbieri ◽  
Jerusha K. Thedsanamoorthy ◽  
...  

The most common cause of acute lung injury is ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), during which mitochondrial damage occurs. We have previously demonstrated that mitochondrial transplantation is an efficacious therapy to replace or augment mitochondria damaged by IRI, allowing for enhanced muscle viability and function in cardiac tissue. Here, we investigate the efficacy of mitochondrial transplantation in a murine lung IRI model using male C57BL/6J mice. Transient ischemia was induced by applying a microvascular clamp on the left hilum for 2 h. Upon reperfusion mice received either vehicle or vehicle-containing mitochondria either by vascular delivery (Mito V) through the pulmonary artery or by aerosol delivery (Mito Neb) via the trachea (nebulization). Sham control mice underwent thoracotomy without hilar clamping and were ventilated for 2 h before returning to the cage. After 24 h recovery, lung mechanics were assessed and lungs were collected for analysis. Our results demonstrated that at 24 h of reperfusion, dynamic compliance and inspiratory capacity were significantly increased and resistance, tissue damping, elastance, and peak inspiratory pressure (Mito V only) were significantly decreased ( P < 0.05) in Mito groups as compared with their respective vehicle groups. Neutrophil infiltration, interstitial edema, and apoptosis were significantly decreased ( P < 0.05) in Mito groups as compared with vehicles. No significant differences in cytokines and chemokines between groups were shown. All lung mechanics results in Mito groups except peak inspiratory pressure in Mito Neb showed no significant differences ( P > 0.05) as compared with Sham. These results conclude that mitochondrial transplantation by vascular delivery or nebulization improves lung mechanics and decreases lung tissue injury.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 125-130
Author(s):  
Marissa Su ◽  
Kimiyo Yamasaki ◽  
Ehab Daoud

Background Prone position ventilation has shown to improve oxygenation and mortality in severe ARDS. The data of prone position ventilation during severe ARDS secondary to COVID-19 have shown similar benefit in oxygenation and mortality. Usually, patient placed in prone position are placed flat or in reverse Trendelenburg positioning to decrease risk of aspiration and abdominal girth compressing the chest. To date, no studies are available to compare the effects of positioning the bed in different angles during the prone position ventilation. Methods An observational study in fifteen patients with severe ARDS secondary to COVID-19 who were placed in the prone position for the first time. All the patients were sedated and chemically paralyzed with no spontaneous effort. All patients were ventilated with the pressure-controlled mode with set PEEP according to the pressure-volume curves. Five patients had esophageal balloon manometry to estimate pleural pressures and trans-pulmonary pressures. Patients were initially placed in reverse Trendelenburg position and later in Trendelenburg position. Tidal volume and respiratory compliance were observed for 30 minutes after bed positioning has been achieved. Tidal volume and total respiratory compliance in both Trendelenburg and reverse Trendelenburg position were compared. Ventilator settings were not changed during the observation. No patients were suspected of increased intra-cranial or intra-ocular pressures. T-test was done to compare the values. Results Tidal volume significantly increased by 80.26 ± 23.4 ml/breath (95% CI 37.7 - 122.9) from 391.3 ± 52.7 to 471.6 ± 60.9 (20.5%) P 0.001. The respiratory system compliance significantly increased by 4.9 ml/cmH2O (95% CI 1.4 - 8.4) from 34.6 ± 4.7 to 39.5 ± 4.6 (14%) P 0.001. Of the five patients with esophageal balloon, the lung compliance significantly increased by 16.7 ml/cmH2O (95% CI 12.8 – 20.6) from 66.6 ± 1.7 to 83.3 ± 3.3 (25%) P 0.001. The chest wall compliance had small but non-significant increase by 1.5 ml/cmH2O (95% CI -1.3 – 4.3) from 65 ± 1.4 to 66.5 ± 2.3 (2%) P 0.085. Conclusion In this study, statistically significant increase in tidal volume, lung and respiratory system compliance were observed in patients placed in the Trendelenburg position during prone position ventilation. The results reflect the effect of body positioning during prone position ventilation. These effects may be the reflection of altered ventilation distribution throughout the lungs and change in pleural pressure as well as trans-pulmonary pressure during body positioning. More studies need to be done to confirm and examine this phenomenon. Precautions should be taken as this maneuver can increase the intra-cranial and intra-ocular pressures. Keywords: COVID-19, Trendelenburg, Reverse Trendelenburg, ARDS


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Wang ◽  
Shihao Zhao ◽  
Zongbin Gao ◽  
Jun Hu ◽  
Yao Lu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) is crucial in mechanical ventilation with supraglottic airway device (SAD). Pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed (PCV-VG), delivering a preset tidal volume with the lowest required airway pressure, is being increasingly used during general anesthesia. In this study, we compared respiratory mechanics and circulatory parameters between volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and PCV-VG in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery using the laryngeal mask airway supreme (LMA). Methods Eighty participants scheduled for laparoscopic surgery were enrolled in this prospective, randomized clinical trial. The participants were randomly assigned to receive VCV or PCV-VG. PIP, dynamic compliance (Cdyn) and mean inspiratory pressure (Pmean) were recorded at 5 min after induction of anesthesia (T1), 5 min after pneumoperitoneum(T2), 30 and 60 min after pneumoperitoneum (T3 and T4). Data including other respiratory variables, hemodynamic variables, and arterial blood gases were also collected. The difference in PIP between VCV and PCV-VG was assessed as the primary outcome. Results PIP was significantly lower at T2, T3, and T4 in both groups compared with T1 (all P <  0.0001), and it was significantly lower in the PCV-VG group than the VCV group at T2, T3, and T4 (all P <  0.001). Cydn was decreased at T2, T3, and T4 in two groups compared with T1 (all P <  0.0001), but it was higher in PCV-VG group than in VCV group at T2, T3, and T4 (all P <  0.0001). There were on statistically significant differences were found between the groups for other respiratory and hemodynamic variables. Conclusion In elderly patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery using an LMA, PCV-VG was superior to VCV in its ability to provide ventilation with lower peak inspiratory pressure and greater dynamic compliance.


1990 ◽  
Vol 65 (10 Spec No) ◽  
pp. 1045-1049 ◽  
Author(s):  
K D Foote ◽  
A H Hoon ◽  
S Sheps ◽  
N R Gunawardene ◽  
R Hershler ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 854-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo A. Araújo ◽  
Maurício Deschk ◽  
Juliana T. Wagatsuma ◽  
Beatriz P. Floriano ◽  
Carlos E. Siqueira ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document