scholarly journals Assesment of placement of the esophageal self-expandable metallic stent in esophageal cancer in patients with or without citorreduction therapy

Author(s):  
Gilson Kamiyama ◽  
Paulo Sakai ◽  
Eduardo Guimarães H. de Moura ◽  
Shinichi Ishioka ◽  
Ivan Cecconello ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Placement of self-expanding metallic esophageal stent in patients with advanced esophageal cancer offers excellent palliation of dysphagia and tracheo-esophageal fistulas. However, the safety of stent in patients undergoing radio and/or chemotherapy is controversial, in terms of the greater risk of complications in cases where these two treatments are used in conjunction. AIM: To assess the use of stent in patients with advanced cancer of the mid-thoracic esophagus, by comparing patients undergoing cytoreductive therapy with patients who have not undergone this treatment, in relation to improvement in the dysphagia, rate of complications, period of effectiveness and survival time. METHODS: Fifty seven patients were evaluated retrospectively (16 women and 41 men, with an average age 62 years) with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the mid-thoracic esophagus who underwent placement of the Ultraflex™ self-expandable metallic coated stent, at the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit of São Paulo University Medical School between October 1988 and October 2004. Out of the 57 patients, 24 patients received adjuvant cytoreductive therapy, and 33 patients were only treated with the stent placement. RESULTS: After stent placement, there was improvement in dysphagia in both groups; there were no differences in the rate of complications, such as migration, pain, fistula, obstruction and compression of the airways; the period of effectiveness was significantly higher in the group submitted to cytoreductive therapy (average 123 days compared to 63 days), as was the survival time (average of 210 days, compared with 120 days). CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in dysphagia was statistically significant in both groups, irrespective of whether the patient had undergone adjuvant cytoreductive therapy; there were no differences in the rate of complications between the two groups and both the period of effectiveness of the stent treatment and the survival time were higher in the group with adjuvant cytoreductive therapy.

2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. AB303
Author(s):  
Bruno C. Martins ◽  
Clarissa R. Villar ◽  
Maria Sylvia I. Ribeiro ◽  
Marcelo S. Lima ◽  
Flavio R. Takeda ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 1062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Yung Kim ◽  
Jiaywei Tsauo ◽  
Ho-Young Song ◽  
Pyeong Hwa Kim ◽  
Jung-Hoon Park

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaya Uesato ◽  
Yasunori Akutsu ◽  
Kentarou Murakami ◽  
Yorihiko Muto ◽  
Akiko Kagaya ◽  
...  

This is a retrospective study to evaluate the prevention of complications of metallic stent placement in patients with unresectable advanced esophageal cancer. A total of 87 patients were treated with 4 types of metal stents in the esophagus over a period of 18 years. Stent placement was technically successful. The most common prior treatment was chemoradiotherapy. There were no significant differences in the rate of patients with no complications among the prior treatments. Approximately, 30% of patients had the most common chest pain in complications. Stent placement within one month after the completion of chemoradiotherapy should be avoided for the prevention of the chest pain. There was no significant difference in the rate of patients with no complications by lesion location. The rate of no complications was higher for the Niti-S stent than the Gianturco Z-stent or Ultraflex stent. Of note, no complications were noted for the Niti-S ultrathin stent at all. Among cases of stent-related death, the most common type of complication was respiratory disorder caused by the stent that seems to be thick and hard. Therefore, the stent with thin and flexible characteristics like the Niti-S ultrathin stent will solve the various problems of esophageal stent placement.


2001 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-81
Author(s):  
Hideo Shimada ◽  
Osamu Chino ◽  
Takayuki Nishi ◽  
Hikaru Tanaka ◽  
Yoshifumi Kise ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 208-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Aoki ◽  
Y. Osaka ◽  
Y. Takagi ◽  
R. Okada ◽  
M. Shinohara ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document