scholarly journals Auditory steady state response in hearing assessment in infants with cytomegalovirus

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 550-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Polo C. Silva ◽  
Priscila Suman Lopez ◽  
Jair Cortez Montovani
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Steady State Response ◽  
Case Description ◽  
Congenital Cytomegalovirus ◽  
State Response ◽  
Auditory Steady State Response ◽  
Brainstem Response

OBJECTIVE: To report an infant with congenital cytomegalovirus and progressive sensorineural hearing loss, who was assessed by three methods of hearing evaluation. CASE DESCRIPTION: In the first audiometry, at four months of age, the infant showed abnormal response in Otoacoustic Emissions and normal Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR), with electrophysiological threshold in 30dBnHL, in both ears. With six months of age, he showed bilateral absence of the ABR at 100dBnHL. The behavioral observational audiometry was impaired due to the delay in neuropsychomotor development. At eight months of age, he was submitted to Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) and the thresholds were 50, 70, absent in 110 and in 100dB, respectively for 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000Hz in the right ear, and 70, 90, 90 and absent in 100dB, respectively for 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000Hz in the left ear. COMMENTS: In the first evaluation, the infant had abnormal Otoacoustic Emission and normal ABR, which became altered at six months of age. The hearing loss severity could be identified only by the ASSR, which allowed the best procedure for hearing aids adaptation. The case description highlights the importance of the hearing status follow-up for children with congenital cytomegalovirus.

scholarly journals Comparison of auditory brainstem response and auditory steady state response audiometry by evaluating the hearing thresholds obtained in children with different severity of hearing loss

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Azeem Aslam ◽  
Adeela Javed ◽  
Abdul Moiz
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Steady State Response ◽  
State Response ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Auditory Steady State Response ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
The Mean

Objectives: To compare the hearing thresholds obtained with auditory brainstem response (ABR) and auditory steady state response (ASSR) audiometry in children with hearing loss. Methods: Hearing thresholds were obtained by ABR and ASSR in children who presented with suspicion of deafness at Ear, nose & throat department of Al-Nafees Medical College Hospital Islamabad, between January to August 2018. The mean hearing thresholds obtained by two tests were compared within each category of severity of deafness. Time taken by both tests was also compared. Results: A total of 57 patients (114 ears) were included in the study. Among them 27 (47.4%) were male and 30 (52.6%) were female. The mean age of patients at presentation was 42 months (±30.9) with age range from one to 12 years. Mean hearing thresholds obtained by click ABR, chirp ABR, ASSR (1, 2, 4 kHz) & ASSR (0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz) was 56.25 (±27.61), 58.88 (±27.44), 58.03 (±21.26) & 56.35 (±22.86) respectively. Mean thresholds were comparable between click ABR & ASSR (1, 2, 4 kHz) and between chirp ABR & ASSR (0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz) in all degrees of hearing loss categories except in those patients with normal hearing thresholds. The mean time taken by clicks ABR, chirp ABR and ASSR were four minutes seven seconds, three minutes 15 seconds and 16 minutes and 7 seconds respectively. Conclusions: Hearing thresholds obtained by ABR and ASSR are comparable in all categories of severity of hearing loss. The time taken by ABR is less as compared to ASSR. How to cite this:Aslam MA, Javed A, Moiz A. Comparison of auditory brainstem response and auditory steady state response audiometry by evaluating the hearing thresholds obtained in children with different severity of hearing loss. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(2):---------.   doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.2.688 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Auditory steady state response in auditory neuropathy

2010 ◽  
Vol 124 (9) ◽  
pp. 950-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Emara ◽  
T A Gabr
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Hearing Threshold ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Auditory Neuropathy ◽  
Steady State Response ◽  
State Response ◽  
Auditory Steady State Response ◽  
Brainstem Response

AbstractReview:Auditory neuropathy is a disorder characterised by preservation of outer hair cell function, with normal otoacoustic emissions and/or cochlear microphonics, but an absent or distorted auditory brainstem response.Purpose:This study aimed to objectively assess hearing thresholds in patients with auditory neuropathy, using the auditory steady state response.Materials and methods:Thirteen patients with auditory neuropathy and 15 normal hearing subjects were examined. Audiological evaluation included basic audiological tests, otoacoustic emissions, auditory brainstem response and auditory steady state response.Results:In the auditory neuropathy patients, the auditory brainstem response was absent in 11 patients, while the auditory steady state response was absent in only three.Conclusion:The auditory steady state response may serve as a valuable objective measure for assessing the hearing threshold across different frequencies in patients with auditory neuropathy. We recommend that auditory steady state response be used to complete the evaluation of patients with auditory neuropathy.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of the Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) and Click Auditory Brainstem Evoked Response (ABR) Thresholds among Filipino Infants and Young Children

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-12
Author(s):  
Laurence Ian C. Tan ◽  
Maria Rina T. Reyes-Quintos ◽  
Maria Leah C. Tantoco ◽  
Charlotte M. Chiong
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Steady State Response ◽  
State Response ◽  
Auditory Steady State Response ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Infants And Young Children

Objective: To compare the results of auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and click auditory brainstem response (click ABR) among infants and young children tested at the Ear Unit of a Tertiary General Hospital.   Methods: Design: Cross-sectional Study Setting: Tertiary General Hospital Population: Within-subject comparisons of click auditory brainstem response (click ABR) thresholds and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) thresholds among 55 infants and young children, 2 months to 35 months of age referred to the Ear Unit for electrophysiologic hearing assessment. Results: Click ABR showed strong positive correlation to all frequencies and averages of ASSR. Highest correlation was noted with the average of 1-4 kHz ASSR results with Pearson r = 0.89 (Spearman r=0.80), the average of 2-4 kHz had strong positive correlation r = 0.88 (0.79). Correlation was consistently strong through all ASSR frequencies (0.5 kHz at r=0.86 (0.74), 1 kHz at r=0.88 (0.78), 2 kHz at r=0. 87 (0.79), 4 kHz at r=0.85 (0.76)). Average differences of click ABR and ASSR thresholds were 8.2±12.9dB at 0.5 kHz, 8.6±12.6dB at 1 kHz, 5.3±11.8dB at 2 kHz and 7.8±13.4dB at 4 kHz. Among patients with no demonstrable waveforms by click ABR with maximal click stimulus, a large percentage presented with ASSR thresholds. Of these, 80.5% (33 of 41) had measurable results at 0.5 kHz with an average of 107.3±11.1dB, 85.4% (35 of 41) at 1 kHz with an average of 110.5±11.8dB, 73.2% (30 of 41) at 2 kHz with an average of 111.2±11.1dB and 63.4% (26 of 41) at 4 kHz with and average of 112.2±8.21dB. Auditory steady-state response results were comparable to auditory brainstem response results in normal to severe hearing loss, and provided additional information necessary for complete audiologic assessment especially among patients with severe to profound hearing loss wherein click ABR showed no responses. Up to 85.4% of patients that would have been noted to have no waveforms by click ABR still demonstrated measurable thresholds by ASSR   Conclusion: Our study suggests that ASSR may be the best available tool for assessing children with severe to profound hearing loss, and is a comparably effective tool in overall hearing assessment for patients requiring electrophysiological testing. The advantages of ASSR over click ABR include: 1) detection of frequency-specific thresholds and; 2) the detection of hearing loss thresholds beyond the limits of click ABR.     Key words: Auditory Steady-State Response, ASSR, Auditory Brainstem-Evoked Response, ABR, Hearing Thresholds, Electrophysiologic Testing  

scholarly journals Threshold Mismatches between Pure-Tone Audiometry and Auditory Steady State Response in Non-Auditory Neuropathy Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (8) ◽  
pp. 350-357
Author(s):  
Heil Noh ◽  
Hyesook Lee
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Brain Lesions ◽  
Auditory Neuropathy ◽  
Steady State Response ◽  
State Response ◽  
Auditory Steady State Response ◽  
Brainstem Response

Background and Objectives To evaluate mismatches between pure-tone audiometry (PTA) and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) tests in non-auditory neuropathy adults and investigate brain lesions that may explain the mismatches, especially in cases where the ASSR threshold was worse than the estimated PTA threshold.Subjects and Method PTA, speech audiometry, auditory brainstem response, ASSR, and neuroimaging tests were carried out on individuals selected. Among them, medical records of 30 subjects (16 males, 14 females; mean age=54.4±13.2 years) with significant mismatches between PTA and estimated ASSR thresholds were analyzed retrospectively. All neuroimaging tests were reviewed to identify any neurologic abnormalities.Results Pathologic brain lesions were found in 19 cases (63.3%) in the study group, all of which showed significant mismatch in hearing threshold between PTA and ASSR. Seven case of ischemic brain lesions (23.3%), five tumorous lesions (16.6%), and four brain vessel anomalies (13.3%) were found. Brain hemorrhage due to trauma were found in two cases (6.6%) as well as one case (3.3%) of unruptured aneurysm. Central auditory pathway disorder was suspected in two cases. The 11 cases showing normal results in the imaging studies included one mental retardation, one brain concussion, and seven cases (23.3%) with no specific causes. Six tinnitus cases included two subjects showing discrepancies between frequency matching in the tinnitogram.Conclusion In adults with a mismatch between PTA thresholds and estimated ASSR thresholds, especially for those with moderate to profound hearing loss, additional neuroimaging tests and other audiologic tests may reveal other possible causes of hearing loss.

The Auditory Steady State Response in Individuals with Neurological Insult of the Central Auditory Nervous System

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 826-845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer B. Shinn ◽  
Frank E. Musiek
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Neurological Impairment ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Steady State Response ◽  
Hearing Sensitivity ◽  
State Response ◽  
Behavioral Thresholds ◽  
Auditory Steady State Response ◽  
Neurological Insult

The auditory steady state response (ASSR) has recently gained attention with respect to estimates of hearing sensitivity and configuration of hearing loss. The present investigation compared behavioral thresholds to estimated ASSR thresholds in subjects with confirmed CANS lesions to determine if this population can be accurately evaluated with ASSR techniques. Comparisons were made between the experimental group and a normal control group matched for age and hearing sensitivity. ASSR thresholds were obtained for the carrier frequencies of 500 and 2000 Hz with a 46 Hz modulation rate and compared to behavioral thresholds. Within and between group comparisons were made. The control group demonstrated strong correlation between their behavioral and estimated ASSR thresholds which significantly contrasted the neurological group. Additionally, individuals with neurological impairment of the CANS exhibited elevated thresholds that were on average 24 dB greater at 2000 Hz than their behavioral thresholds. These results suggest that individuals with neurological insult may appear as hearing impaired or having greater hearing loss than is actually present. As a result, the ASSR may demonstrate the potential to assist in the detection of CANS dysfunction. Las respuestas auditivas de estado estable (ASSR) han ganado atención recientemente con respecto a la estimación de la sensibilidad auditiva y la configuración de la pérdida auditiva. La presente investigación comparó los umbrales conductuales con umbrales estimados por ASSR en sujetos con lesiones CANS confirmadas para determinar si esta población podía ser evaluada con exactitud por medio de técnicas de ASSR. Las comparaciones se realizaron entre el grupo experimental y un grupo control normal ordenados por edad y sensibilidad auditiva. Los umbrales de los ASSR se obtuvieron por medio de frecuencias portadoras de 500 y 2000 Hz, con una tasa de modulación de 46 Hz y se compararon con los umbrales conductuales. Se realizaron comparaciones entre los grupos y dentro de un mismo grupo. El grupo de control mostró una fuerte correlación entre sus umbrales conductuales y los estimados por ASSR, que contrastó significativamente con el grupo neurológico. Adicionalmente, los individuos con un trastorno neurológico de CANS exhibieron umbrales elevados que fueron en promedio 24 dB más alto en 2000 Hz que sus umbrales conductuales. Estos resultados sugieren que los individuos con alteraciones neurológicas pueden lucir como alterados auditivamente o teniendo una pérdida auditiva mayor de la realidad. Como resultados, los ASSR puede demostrar el potencial para ayudar en la detección de la disfunción por CANS.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of the auditory steady state response in diagnosing hearing loss in infants

2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
De Wet Swanepoel ◽  
Dunay Schmulian ◽  
René Hugo
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Steady State Response ◽  
State Response ◽  
Auditory Steady State Response

This paper aims to provide a review of the emerging Auditory Steady State Response in light of existing procedures for diagnosis of hearing loss in infants. Opsomming Hierdie artikel poog om ‘n oorsig te verskaf van die opkomende Ouditief Standhoudende Respons teenoor huidige prosedures wat gebruik word om gehoorverlies in babas en jong kinders te diagnoseer. *Please note: This is a reduced version of the abstract. Please refer to PDF for full text.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document