scholarly journals Knee extensor torque of men with early degrees of osteoarthritis is associated with pain, stiffness and function

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula R. M. S. Serrão ◽  
Karina Gramani-Say ◽  
Giovanna C. Lessi ◽  
Stela M. Mattiello
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Matthew Zaremba ◽  
Joel Martin ◽  
Marcie Fyock-Martin

Clinical Scenario: Knee pathologies often require rehabilitation to address the loss of knee-extensor (KE) strength, function, and heightened pain. However, in the early stages of rehabilitation, higher loads may be contraindicated. Blood flow restriction (BFR) resistance training does not require high loads and has been used clinically to promote strength improvements in a variety of injured populations. BFR resistance training may be an effective alternative to high-intensity resistance training during early rehabilitation of knee pathologies. Clinical Question: Following a knee injury, does BFR resistance training improve KE strength and function, and reduce patient-reported pain? Summary of Key Findings: Four randomized controlled trial studies met the inclusion criteria. Each included study evaluated the use of BFR resistance training on knee pathologies and the effects on KE strength, functional outcomes, and pain compared with high- or low-load resistance training. All 4 studies reported significant improvements in KE strength, function, and pain through a variety of outcome measures, following BFR resistance training use as the treatment. Clinical Bottom Line: There is consistent evidence to support the use of BFR resistance training as a treatment intervention following knee injury and as a means to improve KE strength and function and to reduce pain. Strength of Recommendation: Grade A evidence supporting the use of BFR resistance training for improvement in KE strength and function, and the reduction of patient-reported pain following an acute or chronic knee pathology.


Author(s):  
Samuel Andrew Smith ◽  
Dominic Micklewright ◽  
Samantha Lee Winter ◽  
Alexis R. Mauger

Purpose: The intensity of exercise-induced pain (EIP) reflects the metabolic environment in the exercising muscle, so during endurance exercise this may inform the intelligent regulation of work rate. Conversely, the acute debilitating effects of EIP on motor unit recruitment could impair the estimation of force produced by the muscle and impair judgement of current exercise intensity. This study investigated whether muscle pain that feels like EIP, administered via intramuscular injection of hypertonic saline, interferes with the ability to accurately reproduce torque in a muscle group relevant to locomotive exercise. Methods: On separate days, fourteen participants completed an isometric torque reproduction task of the knee extensors. Participants were required to produce torque at 15 and 20% maximal voluntary torque (MVIT), without visual feedback before (Baseline), during (Pain/No Pain), and after (Recovery) an injection of 0.9% isotonic saline (Control) or 5.8% hypertonic saline (Experimental) into the vastus lateralis of the right leg. Results: An elevated reported intensity of pain, and a significantly increased variance in mean contraction torque at both 15% (P=0.049) and 20% (P=0.002) MVIT was observed in the Experimental compared to the Control condition. Both 15 and 20% target torques were performed at a similar pain intensity in the Experimental condition (15% MVIT, 4.2 ± 1.9; 20% MVIT, 4.5 ± 2.2; P>0.05). Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that the increased muscle pain from the injection of hypertonic saline impeded accurate reproduction of knee extensor torque. These findings have implications for the detrimental impact of EIP on exercise regulation and endurance performance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (7S) ◽  
pp. 244-244
Author(s):  
Tyler J. Roehl ◽  
Daniel G. Cobian ◽  
Mikel R. Stiffler-Joachim ◽  
Jennifer L. Sanfilippo ◽  
Bryan C. Heiderscheit

Physiotherapy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. e46
Author(s):  
E. Martinez-Valdes ◽  
G. Boccia ◽  
M. Nawaz ◽  
F. Negro ◽  
A. Rainoldi ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 16-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien M. Callahan ◽  
Timothy W. Tourville ◽  
James R. Slauterbeck ◽  
Philip A. Ades ◽  
Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 491-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent B. Seitz ◽  
Gabriel S. Trajano ◽  
G. Gregory Haff ◽  
Charles C.L.S. Dumke ◽  
James J. Tufano ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between maximal voluntary postactivation potentiation (PAP) and maximal knee extensor torque, quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume, and type II myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform percentage in human skeletal muscle. Thirteen resistance-trained men completed a test protocol consisting of 2 isokinetic knee extensions at 180°·s–1 performed before and 1, 4, 7, and 10 min after the completion of 4 maximal knee extensions at 60°·s–1 (i.e., a conditioning activity (CA)). Magnetic resonance imaging and muscle microbiopsy procedures were completed on separate days to assess quadriceps CSA and volume and MHC isoform content. Maximal voluntary PAP response was assessed as the ratio of the highest knee extensor torques measured before and after the CA. There were large to very large correlations between maximal voluntary PAP response and maximal knee extensor torque (r = 0.62) and quadriceps CSA (r = 0.68) and volume (r = 0.63). Nonetheless, these correlations were not statistically significant after adjusting for the influence of type II MHC percentage using partial correlation analysis. By contrast, the strongest correlation was observed for type II MHC percentage (r = 0.77), and this correlation remained significant after adjusting for the other variables. Maximal voluntary PAP response is strongly correlated with maximal knee extensor torque and quadriceps CSA and volume, but is mostly clearly associated with the type II myosin isoform percentage in human skeletal muscle.


2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny M. Pincivero ◽  
Paul T. Dixon ◽  
Alan J. Coelho

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Manoel Silva ◽  
Antonio C. Morares ◽  
João Barbieri ◽  
Renato Barroso ◽  
Gabriel Figueiredo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document