THE RESPONSIVENESS OF THE ANTERIOR PITUITARY GLAND TO LUTEINIZING HORMONE RELEASING FACTOR IN RATS EXPOSED TO CONSTANT LIGHT

1975 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. FINK

SUMMARY The responsiveness of the anterior pituitary gland to synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing factor (LH-RF) was tested in rats exposed to constant light. At a dosage of 50 ng LH-RF/ 100 g body wt the mean maximal increments in plasma LH and FSH were similar to those at 10.00 h of pro-oestrus. The increments in the plasma gonadotrophins at dosages of 500 and 1000 ng LH-RF/100 g body wt did not differ significantly from those at 250 ng LH-RF/ 100 g body wt. These findings suggest that, in contrast to rats which exhibit regular oestrous cycles, the preovulatory (post-coital) release of LH in rats exposed to constant light may depend almost entirely on the release of a relatively large amount of LH-RF into hypophysial portal vessel blood. Whereas in pro-oestrous animals a relatively small fraction of the readily releasable pool of LH is released during the spontaneous preovulatory surge, in rats exposed to constant light most releasable LH appears to be discharged during the reflex preovulatory surge of this hormone. The concentrations of radioimmunoassayable FSH in blood samples withdrawn before the injection of LH-RF support the view that FSH secretion in the rat is increased by constant exposure to light.

1974 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 553-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. AIYER ◽  
G. FINK

SUMMARY The role of ovarian hormones in the development of increased sensitivity of the anterior pituitary gland to synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing factor (LH-RF) which occurs before and during the preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) in the rat has been examined. The response of the pituitary gland was determined, with respect to the secretion of LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), after the intravenous injection of 50 ng LH-RF/100 g body weight. The LH-RF was injected 30–60 min after the administration of sodium pentobarbitone at either 13.30 h or 18.80 h of pro-oestrus. Blood samples were collected immediately before and at frequent intervals after the injection of LH-RF, and the concentration of LH and FSH in these samples was measured by radioimmunoassay. Ovariectomy at 10.00–11.00 h of dioestrus reduced the LH response to LH-RF injected at 14.00 h of pro-oestrus, while oestradiol benzoate administered immediately after ovariectomy restored and even augmented this response. These data together with the finding that administration of the antioestrogen, ICI 46 474, at 17.00 h of dioestrus reduced the LH response to LH-RF injected on the afternoon of pro-oestrus indicates that the initial phase of increased pituitary sensitivity to LH-RF is dependent upon the marked rise in the concentration of oestradiol-17β in plasma which precedes the preovulatory surge of LH. The abrupt, marked increase in pituitary sensitivity to LH-RF, which, in the normal cycle, occurs between 14.00 and 18.30 h of pro-oestrus, failed to develop in rats ovariectomized on the morning of dioestrus whether or not oestradiol benzoate was administered after the operation. However, the LH response to LH-RF injected on the evening of pro-oestrus increased significantly when progesterone was administered at 13.00 h of pro-oestrus in rats ovariectomized and treated with oestradiol benzoate at 10.00–11.00 h of dioestrus. This suggests that the development of the second phase of increased pituitary sensitivity to LH-RF depends, at least partially, on progesterone acting on an oestrogen-primed pituitary gland. The concentrations of FSH in blood samples taken before injection of LH-RF at either 14.00 or 18.30 h of pro-oestrus were significantly greater in ovariectomized compared with those in sham-operated rats. In contrast the FSH responses, in terms of the mean maximal increments, were not significantly different in the various groups irrespective of the nature or time of operation or the time of injection of LH-RF. The FSH response to LH-RF was not appreciably altered by treatment with either oestradiol benzoate or progesterone immediately after ovariectomy although it was increased significantly by the sequential administration of oestrogen and progesterone. The significance of the findings that under certain conditions there were considerable differences between the LH and FSH responses to synthetic LH-RF is discussed with respect to the hypothesis that there is a common releasing factor for both gonadotrophins.


2004 ◽  
Vol 287 (5) ◽  
pp. E818-E819 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Maurice Goodman

This essay looks at the historical significance of an APS classic paper that is freely available online: Fevold HL, Hisaw FL, Leonard SL. The gonad stimulating and the luteinizing hormones of the anterior lobe of the hypophesis. Am J Physiol 97: 291—301, 1931 ( http://ajplegacy.physiology.org/cgi/reprint/97/2/291 ).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document