Ovulation rate and the concentrations of gonadotrophins and metabolic hormones in ewes infused with glucose during the late luteal phase of the oestrous cycle

1995 ◽  
Vol 146 (3) ◽  
pp. 403-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Downing ◽  
J Joss ◽  
R J Scaramuzzi
Keyword(s):  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Oestrous Cycle ◽  
Ovulation Rate ◽  
Metabolic Hormones ◽  
Late Luteal Phase ◽  
Early Follicular Phase ◽  
Lh Secretion ◽  
Effect Of Glucose ◽  
Stimulation Of

Abstract The positive relationship between nutrition and ovulation rate was investigated in sheep infused intravenously with glucose. Ovulation rate increased (2·0±0·0 vs 2·4 ± 0·3) when ewes were given an infusion of glucose (60–65 mm/h) for five days in the late luteal phase of the oestrous cycle. The effect of glucose was obtained without any significant change in LH secretion. The concentration of FSH in glucose-infused ewes was lower during the infusion (luteal phase) but higher during the early follicular phase. These data suggest that the change in ovulation rate occurred without increased gonadotrophin support to the follicle during the late luteal phase, which is the period of the sheep oestrous cycle during which improved nutrition increases ovulation rate. There were no changes in GH or prolactin, but changes in circulating glucose and insulin levels were detected. We conclude that insulin, because of its role in cell growth and metabolism, is involved in mediating ovulation responses to nutritional stimuli, either directly or more likely by the stimulation of insulin-mediated glucose uptake. Journal of Endocrinology (1995) 146, 403–410

Pulsatile secretion of inhibin, oestradiol and androstenedione by the ovary of the sheep during the oestrous cycle

1990 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. K. Campbell ◽  
G. E. Mann ◽  
A. S. McNeilly ◽  
D. T. Baird
Keyword(s):  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Venous Blood ◽  
Pulse Amplitude ◽  
Pulse Frequency ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Oestrous Cycle ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Early Follicular Phase ◽  
Lh Secretion ◽  
Late Follicular Phase

ABSTRACT The pattern of pulsatile secretion of inhibin, oestradiol and androstenedione by the ovary at different stages of the oestrous cycle in sheep was studied in five Finn–Merino ewes in which the left ovary had been autotransplanted to the neck. The ewes had jugular venous blood samples collected at 4-hourly intervals from 42 h before the induction of luteolysis by i.m. injection of cloprostenol (100 μg) on day 10 of the oestrous cycle, until day 3 of the following cycle. There were five periods of intensive blood sampling, when both ovarian and jugular venous blood samples were collected, as follows: (a) mid-luteal phase, before the second injection of cloprostenol on day 10 (15-min intervals for 6 h); (b) early follicular phase, 24 h after the second injection of cloprostenol (10-min intervals for 4 h); (c) late follicular phase, 48 h after the second injection of cloprostenol (10-min intervals for 4 h); (d) after the LH surge on day 1 of the cycle, 76 h after the second injection of cloprostenol (10-min intervals for 4 h); (e) early luteal phase on day 3 of the cycle, 120 h after the second injection of cloprostenol (10-min intervals for 3 h). Plasma was collected and the samples assayed for LH, FSH, progesterone, oestradiol, androstenedione and inhibin. The ovarian secretion rates for oestradiol, androstenedione and inhibin were calculated. All ewes responded normally to the luteolytic dose of cloprostenol with the preovulatory surge of LH occurring within 56·4±1·6 h (mean ± s.e.m.) followed by the establishment of a normal luteal phase. The pulse frequency of LH, oestradiol and androstenedione increased in the transition from the luteal to the follicular phase (P<0·01). On day 1 of the cycle LH secretion consisted of low-amplitude high-frequency pulses (1·0±0·1 pulse/h) to which androstenedione, but not oestradiol, responded. On day 3 of the cycle LH secretion was similar to that on day 1 but both androstenedione and oestradiol secretion were pulsatile in response to LH, indicating the presence of oestrogenic follicles. The stage of the cycle had no significant effects on LH pulse amplitude and nadir but the ovarian secretory response to LH stimulation did vary with the stage of the cycle. Prolactin pulse frequency, amplitude and nadir were higher (P<0·05) during the follicular phase than the luteal phase. Prolactin pulse frequency was depressed (P<0·05) on day 1 of the cycle but increased to follicular phase levels on day 3. Prolactin pulse frequency was significantly correlated to oestradiol pulse frequency (r = 0·54; P<0·01). During the luteal phase there were insufficient oestradiol pulses to obtain an estimate of pulse amplitude and nadir but both these parameters reached their highest level during the late follicular phase, fell to negligible levels on day 1 and increased to early follicular phase levels on day 3. Androstenedione pulse amplitude and nadir exhibited similar but less marked variation. Inhibin secretion was episodic at all stages of the cycle examined but did not exhibit significant variation with stage of cycle in any of the parameters of episodic secretion measured. Inhibin pulses were not related to either LH or prolactin at any stage of the cycle. FSH secretion was not detectably pulsatile but jugular venous concentrations of FSH at each stage of the oestrous cycle were negatively correlated with mean oestradiol (r= −0·52; P<0·01 but not inhibin secretion (r = 0·19). We conclude that (i) LH secretion is pulsatile at all stages of the oestrous cycle but the steroidogenic responses of the ovary varies with the stage of the cycle, reflecting changes in characteristics of the follicle population, (ii) ovarian inhibin secretion is episodic and displays little change with the stage of the oestrous cycle and (iii) episodic inhibin secretion is not related to either pulses of LH or prolactin. The aetiology of these inhibin pulses therefore remains unknown. Journal of Endocrinology (1990) 126, 385–393

Changes in the secretion of LH pulses, FSH and prolactin during the preovulatory phase of the oestrous cycle of the ewe and the influence of treatment with bovine follicular fluid during the luteal phase

1988 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Wallace ◽  
G. B. Martin ◽  
A. S. McNeilly
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Fluid ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Pulse Amplitude ◽  
Pulse Frequency ◽  
Ovarian Follicles ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Oestrous Cycle ◽  
Ovulation Rate ◽  
The Other ◽  
Lh Secretion

ABSTRACT It has previously been shown that treatment of ewes with bovine follicular fluid (bFF) throughout the luteal phase of the oestrous cycle lowers plasma levels of FSH but increases the frequency and amplitude of the pulses of LH. Under these conditions, ovarian follicles grow to a maximum diameter of 2·7 mm and have a reduced capacity to release oestradiol. We have examined the nature of the gonadotrophin signals controlling follicular development in the normally cycling ewe and have investigated the effects of previous exposure to bFF on these signals and the follicular responses to them. Control ewes (n = l) were injected i.v. with 9 ml bovine serum and treated ewes were injected with 9 ml bFF, twice daily from days 1 to 10 of the luteal phase (day 0 = oestrus). The ewes were injected with prostaglandin analogue on day 11 of the cycle to induce luteolysis and the gonadotrophin patterns were studied in blood sampled from these animals every 10 min for up to 72 h during the subsequent follicular phase. Following luteolysis (and the end of bFF treatment), LH pulse frequency increased rapidly in both groups and reached 1 pulse/h within 6 h. Thereafter, pulse frequency increased marginally and reached 1 pulse/50 min by the onset of the LH surge. This pattern was not affected by previous treatment with bFF. In the control ewes, the amplitude of the LH pulses did not change significantly following luteolysis or at any time during the follicular phase, while the levels of FSH declined slowly until the onset of the surge. In the treated ewes, on the other hand, there was an immediate increase in both LH pulse amplitude and the concentration of FSH immediately after the end of bFF treatment at luteolysis, and they remained above control levels for 24 and 16 h respectively. Plasma prolactin levels did not appear to change around the time of luteolysis but showed a marked and significant diurnal rhythm (nadir around noon and peak around midnight) in both groups. The concentrations of prolactin were significantly (P<0·001) lower and the preovulatory peak was delayed and reduced in the bFF-treated ewes relative to controls. The onset of oestrus was also significantly (P<0·01) delayed by bFF treatment, but the ovulation rates did not differ between the groups. Furthermore, comparisons within or between groups revealed no significant relationships between any of the variables of plasma LH secretion during the follicular phase and the subsequent ovulation rate. These observations provide a complete description of gonadotrophin patterns during the follicular phase of the ewe and confirm the suggestion that an increase in LH pulse frequency is the major driving force behind the follicular growth that ultimately leads to ovulation. On the other hand, it appears most unlikely that the pattern of LH secretion during the follicular phase has any influence on ovulation rate. The levels of FSH declined in the period leading up to the preovulatory surge, presumably as a consequence of rising peripheral levels of oestrogen (and/or inhibin). We also expected LH pulse amplitude to decline during the follicular phase because it has been proposed that pulse amplitude is also controlled by oestrogen. The absence of any significant fall in amplitude suggests that hypotheses about the control of LH secretion drawn from studies with ovariectomized ewes require further verification in the intact ewe. The effect of bFF on prolactin levels probably reflects the low rates of secretion of oestradiol by the small ovarian follicles in these ewes. J. Endocr. (1988) 116, 123–135

Patterns of gonadotropin secretion in cyclic Finn ewes selected for and against high ovulation rate

1995 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Haresign ◽  
A. C. Cooper ◽  
M. Khalid ◽  
J. P. Hanrahan
Keyword(s):  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Pulse Frequency ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Oestrous Cycle ◽  
Ovulation Rate ◽  
Gonadotropin Secretion ◽  
High Line ◽  
Lh Secretion

AbstractA comparison of the patterns of LH and FSH secretion was undertaken in lines of Finn sheep selected for and against high ovulation rate. Mean ovulation rate was significantly higher in the high line ewes (mean 4·1) compared with both the control (mean 2·5) and low line (mean 2·7) ewes (P <0·01). The pre-ovulatory LH peak occurred significantly earlier in the high line ewes (mean 52·1 h) compared with both the control (mean 65·0 h) and low line (mean 59·0 h) ewes (P < 0·05). While mean LH pulse frequency and overall mean LH concentrations were both significantly higher during the follicular compared with the luteal phase of the cycle (P < 0·05), there were no consistent relationships between patterns of pulsatile LH secretion and ovulation rate among the three selection lines. Plasma FSH concentrations remained significantly higher over the entire follicular phase of the oestrous cycle in the high line ewes compared with both the control and low line ewes (P < 0·05). It is suggested that the ovulation rate achieved by high line ewes may be causally related to their higher follicular phase FSH concentrations.

Seasonal and steroid-dependent effects on the modulation of LH secretion in the ewe by intracerebroventricularly administered β-endorphin or naloxone

1989 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 509-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. E. Horton ◽  
H. Francis ◽  
I. J. Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Breeding Season ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Pulse Frequency ◽  
Opioid Peptide ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Oestrous Cycle ◽  
Opioid Antagonist ◽  
Endogenous Opioid ◽  
Endogenous Opioid Peptide ◽  
Lh Secretion

ABSTRACT The natural opioid ligand, β-endorphin, and the opioid antagonist, naloxone, were administered intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) to evaluate effects on LH secretion in ovariectomized ewes and in ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol-17β plus progesterone either during the breeding season or the anoestrous season. Ovary-intact ewes were also studied during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle. Jugular blood samples were taken at 10-min intervals for 8 h and either saline (20–50 μl), 100 μg naloxone or 10 μg β-endorphin were injected i.c.v. after 4 h. In addition, luteal phase ewes were injected i.c.v. with 25 μg β-endorphin(1–27), a purported endogenous opioid antagonist. In ovariectomized ewes, irrespective of season, saline and naloxone did not affect LH secretion, but β-endorphin decreased the plasma LH concentrations, by reducing LH pulse frequency. The effect of β-endorphin was blocked by administering naloxone 30 min beforehand. Treating ovariectomized ewes with oestradiol-17β plus progesterone during the breeding season reduced plasma LH concentrations from 6–8 μg/l to less than 1 μg/l. In these ewes, saline did not alter LH secretion, but naloxone increased LH pulse frequency and the plasma concentrations of LH within 15–20 min. During anoestrus, the combination of oestradiol-17β plus progesterone to ovariectomized ewes reduced the plasma LH concentrations from 3–5 μg/l to undetectable levels, and neither saline nor naloxone affected LH secretion. During the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle, naloxone enhanced LH pulse frequency, which resulted in increased plasma LH concentrations; saline had no effect. In these sheep, β-endorphin decreased LH pulse frequency and the mean concentrations of LH, and this effect was prevented by the previous administration of naloxone. The i.c.v. administration of β-endorphin(1–27) to luteal phase ewes did not affect LH secretion. These data demonstrate the ability of a naturally occurring opioid peptide to inhibit LH secretion in ewes during the breeding and non-breeding seasons, irrespective of the gonadal steroid background. In contrast, whilst the gonadal steroids suppress LH secretion in ovariectomized ewes during both seasons, they only appear to activate endogenous opioid peptide (EOP)-mediated inhibition of LH secretion during the breeding season. Furthermore, these data support the notion that LH secretion in ovariectomized ewes is not normally under the control of EOP, so that naloxone has no effect. Journal of Endocrinology (1989) 122, 509–517

Evidence that the switch from negative to positive feedback at the level of the pituitary gland is an important timing event for the onset of the preovulatory surge in LH in the ewe

1995 ◽  
Vol 145 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
I J Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Pituitary Gland ◽  
Negative Feedback ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Bolus Injection ◽  
Pulse Frequency ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Oestrous Cycle ◽  
Lh Surge ◽  
Small Rise ◽  
Lh Secretion

Abstract Experiments were performed to test the hypothesis that there is a negative feedback 'clamp' of ovarian hormones on the hypothalamus and pituitary gland during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle that limits the secretion of GnRH and LH. GnRH secretion was monitored by sampling the hypophysial portal blood of ewes during the luteal phase of the oestrous cycle and either 24 h or 48 h after the induction of luteolysis by the injection of cloprostenol, a prostaglandin analogue. There was an increase in GnRH pulse frequency in the transition from the luteal to the follicular phase of the cycle. A reduction in the amplitude of GnRH pulses did not occur until 48 h after cloprostenol, suggestive of negative feedback at the level of the hypothalamus that is more profound in the latter part of the follicular phase. The responsivity of the pituitary gland to GnRH was monitored in ewes during the luteal phase of the oestrous cycle and 24 h or 48 h after cloprostenol. Injections of 250 ng or 1000 ng GnRH were given (i.v.) to ewes that had been anaesthetised to suppress endogenous secretion of GnRH and LH. Using the lower dose, the responses 48 h after cloprostenol were not significantly different from those in the luteal phase. With the higher dose of GnRH, a significant (P<0·05) increase in mean responsivity was seen 48 h after cloprostenol. There was, however, a marked variation in response, with some ewes showing profound increases in LH secretion in response to GnRH and others showing responses that were similar to those obtained during the luteal phase of the cycle. These data are interpreted to mean that the secretion of LH is 'clamped' during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle and the 'clamp' is only released near the time of the preovulatory LH surge. To test whether or not a rise in GnRH input to the pituitary gland could over-ride the 'clamp' on the pituitary secretion of LH in the late follicular phase of the cycle, sheep were treated 40 h after cloprostenol with either a bolus injection of 500 ng GnRH or four pulses of 125 ng GnRH given at 10-min intervals. These treatments caused small elevations in LH secretion but did not always cause preovulatory LH surges. In some cases, a small rise in LH secretion was induced by GnRH treatments and levels of LH in plasma returned to baseline with the preovulatory LH surge occurring a few hours later. In one clear case, a bolus injection of GnRH induced an LH surge. The overall data from the GnRH-treated groups, however, indicated a significant delay in the onset of the LH surge which may have been due to perturbation of the subcellular mechanisms in the gonadotrophs. These data were interpreted to mean that the secretion of LH from the pituitary gland is inhibited up to very soon before the onset of the LH surge. The inhibitory factor could be oestrogen but could also be some other pituitary feedback hormone such as gonadotrophin surge-attenuating factor. It is concluded that the increase in the secretion of GnRH at the time of the onset of the LH surge is closely linked to an increase in the responsivity of the gonadotrophs to GnRH. The latter is not caused by the increase in the secretion of GnRH. Journal of Endocrinology (1995) 145, 271–282

scholarly journals Increased ovulation rate in gilts treated with dihydrotestosterone

Reproduction ◽  
2002 ◽  
pp. 527-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Cardenas ◽  
WF Pope ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Oestrous Cycle ◽  
Ovulation Rate ◽  
Corpora Lutea ◽  
Fsh Receptor ◽  
Receptor Mrna ◽  
Preovulatory Follicles ◽  
Early Follicular Phase

Treatment with testosterone increases ovulation rate in pigs. The present study was conducted to examine the effects of 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a non-aromatizable androgen receptor ligand, on ovulation rate and amounts of androgen receptor and FSH receptor mRNAs in postpubertal gilts. In Expt 1, ovulation rate in response to daily i.m. injections of 0, 6, 60 or 600 microg DHT kg(-1) body weight from day 13 of the oestrous cycle (day 0 = day 1 of oestrus) to the following oestrus increased with each dose of DHT (P < 0.05). The mean increase in number of corpora lutea ranged from approximately three to 17 over the three dosages of DHT. In Expt 2, gilts treated daily with 60 microg DHT kg(-1) body weight during the early follicular phase (from day 13 to day 16), coincident with follicular recruitment, or the late follicular phase (day 17 to oestrus), had higher (P < 0.05) rates of ovulation compared with gilts that received vehicle, and were not different from gilts treated with DHT from day 13 to oestrus. Percentage recovery of day 3 embryos was not altered when gilts were treated from day 13 to day 16 or from day 17 to oestrus; however, treatment of gilts with DHT from day 13 to oestrus decreased recovery of day 3 (Expt 1) or day 11 (Expt 2) conceptuses. Daily administration of 6 microg DHT kg(-1) body weight to gilts from day 13 of the oestrous cycle to the following oestrus (Expt 3) did not affect the relative amounts of androgen receptor mRNA, but increased (P < 0.05) the amounts of FSH receptor mRNA in preovulatory follicles as determined by RT-PCR. The results of these experiments indicate that androgens may regulate ovulation rate in gilts. One of the roles of androgens might be regulation of the amounts of FSH receptor mRNA in ovarian follicles.

THE SEQUENCE OF PITUITARY RESPONSES TO SYNTHETIC LUTEINIZING HORMONE RELEASING HORMONE (LH-RH) THROUGHOUT THE NORMAL MENSTRUAL CYCLE

1975 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 625-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elwyn M. Grimes ◽  
Irwin E. Thompson ◽  
Melvin L. Taymor
Keyword(s):  
Menstrual Cycle ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Lh Surge ◽  
Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone ◽  
Late Luteal Phase ◽  
Normal Menstrual Cycle ◽  
Early Follicular Phase ◽  
Lh Rh ◽  
Late Follicular Phase

ABSTRACT Thirty-one ovulatory women between 20 and 33 years of age were given 150 μg of synthetic LH-RH during different phases of the menstrual cycle. Five patients were studied during the early follicular phase (days 4–7); 10 patients during the late follicular phase (days 9–12); 6 patients during the "LH Surge"; 5 patients during the early luteal phase (days 14–16); 3 patients during mid-luteal phase (days 17–21); and 2 patients during late luteal phase (days 22–27). Oestrogen, progesterone, FSH and LH levels were determined from 30 min prior to LH-RH administration to 90 min thereafter in all cases. LH response to LH-RH increased progressively during the follicular phase. Enhanced pituitary responsiveness to LH-RH occurred at mid-cycle for both LH and FSH and maximum LH responses occurred during the "LH Surge" and early luteal phase. LH responses during the mid and late luteal phases were similar to late follicular phase responses. There were no significant differences between FSH responses during the early follicular, late follicular, mid-luteal and late luteal phases. Maximum pituitary responsiveness appears to occur in a gonadal steroid milieu of high oestrogen levels in association with rising but low progesterone levels. Progesterone or a crucial oestrogen: progesterone ratio may in fact potentiate pituitary release of LH during the early stages of corpus luteum formation. Pituitary responsiveness to LH-RH correlates positively with basal LH and oestrogen levels during the menstrual cycle and with the oestrogen:progesterone ratio during the luteal phase.

The Role of Transient Hyperprolactinaemia in the Short Luteal Phase

1980 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. S75-S81
Author(s):  
J. R. T. Coutts ◽  
R. Fleming ◽  
M. C. Macnaughton
Keyword(s):  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Cycle Period ◽  
Plasma Analysis ◽  
Steroid Secretion ◽  
Menstrual Cycles ◽  
Infertile Women ◽  
Late Luteal Phase ◽  
Early Follicular Phase

Daily plasma analysis of complete menstrual cycles from infertile women (n = 32) revealed transient hyperprolactinaemia in a significant number in comparison with normally cycling women. The prolactin elevations occurred for variable durations at different stages of the cycle. Transient hyperprolactinaemia occurring at mid-cycle was associated with reduced late luteal phase steroid levels and short luteal phases. When the prolactin elevations occurred at other times they were unrelated to ovarian steroid levels. Treatment of patients with short luteal phases with bromocriptine (2.5 mg/day) normalised prolactin levels but also reduced gonadotrophins. The net result of these changes was a normalisation of the length of the luteal phase which was now deficient in steroid secretion. To alleviate these problems the treatments proposed for the short luteal phase are either bromocriptine (2.5 mg/day) for 7 days over the mid-cycle period only or bromocriptine for 7 days at mid-cycle in conjunction with a follicular stimulant in the early follicular phase.

Manipulation of inhibin during the luteal-follicular phase transition of the primate menstrual cycle fails to affect FSH secretion

1994 ◽  
Vol 142 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
H M Fraser ◽  
C G Tsonis
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transition ◽  
Menstrual Cycle ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Serum Concentrations ◽  
Late Luteal Phase ◽  
Early Follicular Phase ◽  
Negative Feedback Control

Abstract The pattern of inhibin concentrations in blood during the menstrual cycle in primates has suggested an endocrine role of inhibin in the negative feedback control of FSH secretion during the luteal phase. Conversely, the fall in inhibin during the late luteal phase may play a role in the rise in serum FSH during the luteal-follicular phase transition. This hypothesis was examined by determining the effects of manipulation of inhibin on FSH secretion in stumptailed macaques. During the mid-luteal phase the putative inhibin feedback was inhibited by i.v. administration of 20 ml of ovine antiserum to human recombinant inhibin in 4 macaques. FSH secretion was unaffected during the initial 24 h period post-treatment and the timing of the rise in FSH which occurred during the subsequent luteal-follicular phase transition was normal. To determine whether the elevated serum concentrations of FSH observed during the early follicular phase could be reduced by administration of inhibin, 5 cyclic macaques were treated with 200 μg of recombinant human inhibin i.v. Serum FSH concentrations were unaltered. These results suggest that inhibin does not play a major role in modulating FSH secretion during the luteal-follicular phase transition. Journal of Endocrinology (1994) 142, 181–186

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document