scholarly journals Addition of the Antioxidant Probucol to Angiotensin II Type I Receptor Antagonist Arrests Progressive Mesangioproliferative Glomerulonephritis in the Rat

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 783-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuji Kondo ◽  
Maki Shimizu ◽  
Maki Urushihara ◽  
Koichiro Tsuchiya ◽  
Masanori Yoshizumi ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 535 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 283-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomohisa Takagi ◽  
Norimasa Yoshida ◽  
Yutaka Isozaki ◽  
Makoto Shimozawa ◽  
Kazuhiro Katada ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 304 (5) ◽  
pp. F614-F622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Patinha ◽  
Angelica Fasching ◽  
Dora Pinho ◽  
António Albino-Teixeira ◽  
Manuela Morato ◽  
...  

Increased angiotensin II (ANG II) or adenosine can potentiate each other in the regulation of renal hemodynamics and tubular function. Diabetes is characterized by hyperfiltration, yet the roles of ANG II and adenosine receptors for controlling baseline renal blood flow (RBF) or tubular Na+ handling in diabetes is presently unknown. Accordingly, the changes in their functions were investigated in control and 2-wk streptozotocin-diabetic rats after intrarenal infusion of the ANG II AT1 receptor antagonist candesartan, the adenosine A1 receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), or their combination. Compared with controls, the baseline blood pressure, RBF, and renal vascular resistance (RVR) were similar in diabetics, whereas the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and filtration fraction (FF) were increased. Candesartan, DPCPX, or the combination increased RBF and decreased RVR similarly in all groups. In controls, the GFR was increased by DPCPX, but in diabetics, it was decreased by candesartan. The FF was decreased by candesartan and DPCPX, independently. DPCPX caused the most pronounced increase in fractional Na+ excretion in both controls and diabetics, whereas candesartan or the combination only affected fractional Li+ excretion in diabetics. These results suggest that RBF, via a unifying mechanism, and tubular function are under strict tonic control of both ANG II and adenosine in both control and diabetic kidneys. Furthermore, increased vascular AT1 receptor activity is a contribution to diabetes-induced hyperfiltration independent of any effect of adenosine A1 receptors.


2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 657-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshimitsu Okuda ◽  
Norimasa Yoshida ◽  
Tomohisa Takagi ◽  
Osamu Handa ◽  
Satoshi Kokura ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 1694 ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiki Nozaki ◽  
Hiroyuki Ura ◽  
Ichiro Takumi ◽  
Shiro Kobayashi ◽  
Eiichi Maru ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
pp. 1034-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Masuko ◽  
Maeng Bong Jin ◽  
Hiroyuki Horiuchi ◽  
Tomomi Suzuki ◽  
Masahiko Taniguchi ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig CHEETHAM ◽  
Gerard O'DRISCOLL ◽  
Kim STANTON ◽  
Roger TAYLOR ◽  
Daniel GREEN

We have demonstrated previously that inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) with enalapril and angiotensin II blockade with losartan improve acetylcholine-dependent endothelial function in resistance vessels of patients with Type II diabetes. It was therefore of interest to examine the effect of losartan on conduit vessel function in this group. The influence of losartan (50 mg daily for 4 weeks) on endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilator function was determined in 12 subjects with Type II diabetes using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover protocol. Conduit vessel endothelial function was assessed using high-resolution ultrasound and the brachial artery response to reactive hyperaemia (flow-mediated dilation; FMD); glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) was used as a non-endothelium-dependent dilator. Losartan administration significantly increased the FMD response from 5.2±0.7% (mean±S.E.M.) to 7.4±0.6% of vessel diameter (P < 0.05; paired t-test). There was no effect of losartan on the endothelium-independent responses to GTN (17.8±1.8% to 17.6±1.2%). Consistent with our previous findings in resistance vessels, administration of 50 mg of losartan daily improves NO-mediated dilation in the conduit vessels of subjects with Type II diabetes. Together with the findings that both ACE inhibition and angiotensin II blockade improve resistance vessel function in this group, it is likely that at least some of the beneficial effect is mediated through the angiotensin II/type 1 receptor pathway. A type 1 receptor antagonist seems a reasonable alternative to an ACE inhibitor to maintain conduit vessel endothelial function in Type II diabetic subjects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document