scholarly journals DNA extraction of Nephila clavipes using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification kit (Promega) v1 (protocols.io.kbhcsj6)

protocols.io ◽  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Filipe ◽  
Luiz Filipe
Author(s):  
I. Martincová ◽  
T. Aghová

Comparison of 12 DNA extraction kits for vertebrate samples Martincová, I. Aghová, T. Abstract Obtaining high quality DNA extractions is a crucial step for molecular biology research projects. At present, numerous protocols are available for vertebrate tissue extractions. In the present study we compared eleven column–based protocols and one HotSHOT protocol using similar conditions (i.e., type of sample, weight of starting material). We evaluated time of extraction, quality and quantity of DNA yield, and price of extraction for a single sample. Based on our analysis, the most successful kits for producing DNA with the highest concentration and purity are the JetQuick® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Genomed) and the NucleoSpin® Tissue (Macherey–Nagel). Nevertheless, it is highly recommended to test various extraction kits with specific samples to find the optimal kit in all aspects of time, quality and cost for a particular project.


Author(s):  
Mohamed Sabri Esa ◽  
Nur Huda Faujan ◽  
Haitham Abdullah Rajab ◽  
Maryam Mohamed Rehan ◽  
Norlelawati Arifin ◽  
...  

The efficiency of DNA extraction from whole blood using appropriate method is very important for molecular analysis. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the purity and concentration of DNA extraction method from bovine (Bos taurus), chicken (Gallus gallus), and porcine (Sus scrofa) blood. The DNA of blood samples was extracted using three types of kit, namely InnuPREP Blood DNA Mini Kit, Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit, and QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit. The results showed that blood DNA extracted using QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit was found to be the most effective and consistently produced high concentrated and pure DNA for three animal samples. The purity of DNA ranged from 1.73 ± 0.05 Å to 1.94 ± 0.21 Å and the range of blood DNA concentration extracted using the QIAamp DNA were between 13.73 ± 2.11 and 25.01 ± 2.08 ng/?l. However, the blood DNA of porcine was not successfully extracted using InnuPREP Blood DNA Mini Kit and Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit. These results were very crucial for the subsequent use of amplification using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and to facilitate accurate detection in further analysis.


2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1068-1073
Author(s):  
Xiaolan KONG ◽  
Zuozhi CHEN ◽  
Lin LIN ◽  
Chunhou LI ◽  
Peiwen LIANG

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (08) ◽  
pp. 4754
Author(s):  
Tanushree Mitra* ◽  
Shivshankar Kumdale ◽  
Sameer Chowdhary ◽  
Amol D. Raut

The main objective of this study was to make sure whether randomly taken 12 samples were sensitive to abacavir. The genomic DNA from 12 blood sample were extracted by phenol chloroform DNA extraction method, extracted genomic DNA were amplified and sequenced, thereafter SNPs were detected. Every sample had shown the presence of normal base at SNP position. This study indicated, those randomly taken 12 patients were sensitive to abacavir, so they can consume abacavir if they get infected with HIV.


mSphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Engel ◽  
Sara Coyotzi ◽  
Melody A. Vachon ◽  
Jennifer R. McKelvie ◽  
Josh D. Neufeld

ABSTRACT Bentonite clay is an integral component of the engineered barrier system of deep geological repositories (DGRs) that are planned for the long-term storage of high-level radioactive waste. Although nucleic acid extraction and analysis can provide powerful qualitative and quantitative data reflecting the presence, abundance, and functional potential of microorganisms within DGR materials, extraction of microbial DNA from bentonite clay is challenging due to the low biomass and adsorption of nucleic acids to the charged clay matrix. In this study, we used quantitative PCR, gel fingerprinting, and high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons to assess DNA extraction efficiency from natural MX-80 bentonite and the same material “spiked” with Escherichia coli genomic DNA. Extraction protocols were tested without additives and with casein and phosphate as blocking agents. Although we demonstrate improved DNA recovery by blocking agents at relatively high DNA spiking concentrations, at relatively low spiking concentrations, we detected a high proportion of contaminant nucleic acids from blocking agents that masked sample-specific microbial profile data. Because bacterial genomic DNA associated with casein preparations was insufficiently removed by UV treatment, casein is not recommended as an additive for DNA extractions from low-biomass samples. Instead, we recommend a kit-based extraction protocol for bentonite clay without additional blocking agents, as tested here and validated with multiple MX-80 bentonite samples, ensuring relatively high DNA recoveries with minimal contamination. IMPORTANCE Extraction of microbial DNA from MX-80 bentonite is challenging due to low biomass and adsorption of nucleic acid molecules to the charged clay matrix. Blocking agents improve DNA recovery, but their impact on microbial community profiles from low-biomass samples has not been characterized well. In this study, we evaluated the effect of casein and phosphate as blocking agents for quantitative recovery of nucleic acids from MX-80 bentonite. Our data justify a simplified framework for analyzing microbial community DNA associated with swelling MX-80 bentonite samples within the context of a deep geological repository for used nuclear fuel. This study is among the first to demonstrate successful extraction of DNA from Wyoming MX-80 bentonite.


2003 ◽  
Vol 64 (10) ◽  
pp. S96
Author(s):  
Dawn M. Thomas ◽  
Paul Kawczak ◽  
Daniel Cook ◽  
Edward J. Ball

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S220
Author(s):  
Karlygash Aubakirova ◽  
Madina Omasheva ◽  
Natalya Ryabushkina ◽  
Laura Yerbolova ◽  
Tolepbergen Tazhibaev ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document