scholarly journals Diagnosis of primary site of tumour origin using immunohistochemistry on cell block in cases of malignant ascitic fluid

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-49
Author(s):  
Dr. Trupti S. Patel ◽  
◽  
Dr. Deepak K. Goel ◽  
Dr. Priti P. Trivedi ◽  
Dr. Suchita P. Patel ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-93
Author(s):  
Yoshitomo KONISHI ◽  
Satoko KAGABU ◽  
Iwao ONO ◽  
Akira ISHII ◽  
Hiroto KON ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
pp. 965-974
Author(s):  
Nicholas Pavlidis ◽  
George Pentheroudakis

This chapter covers cancer of unknown primary site (CUP), and includes information on epidemiology, molecular biology, pathology, and multidisciplinary management of clinicopathological subsets. Previously, these tumours were diagnosed and treated based on clinical presentation, light microscopy and clinical intuition. Today, the majority of cancers of unknown primary site are becoming less unknown, more accurately classified, and appropriately treated by the use of multiplex or genome-wide expression profiling platforms. These techniques allow for precise and correct knowledge of the true tumour origin, leading to more rational and effective treatment. However, there also may be genetic signatures that are primary-independent, pro-metastatic, and possibly CUP-specific.


Author(s):  
Nicholas Pavlidis ◽  
George Pentheroudakis

This chapter covers cancer of unknown primary site (CUP), and includes information on epidemiology, molecular biology, pathology, and multidisciplinary management of clinicopathological subsets. Previously, these tumours were diagnosed and treated based on clinical presentation, light microscopy and clinical intuition. Today, the majority of cancers of unknown primary site are becoming less unknown, more accurately classified, and appropriately treated by the use of multiplex or genome-wide expression profiling platforms. These techniques allow for precise and correct knowledge of the true tumour origin, leading to more rational and effective treatment. However, there also may be genetic signatures that are primary-independent, pro-metastatic, and possibly CUP-specific.


Author(s):  
Nicholas Pavlidis ◽  
George Pentheroudakis

This chapter covers cancer of unknown primary site (CUP), and includes information on epidemiology, molecular biology, pathology, and multidisciplinary management of clinicopathological subsets. Previously, these tumours were diagnosed and treated based on clinical presentation, light microscopy and clinical intuition. Today, the majority of cancers of unknown primary site are becoming less unknown, more accurately classified, and appropriately treated by the use of multiplex or genome-wide expression profiling platforms. These techniques allow for precise and correct knowledge of the true tumour origin, leading to more rational and effective treatment. However, there also may be genetic signatures that are primary-independent, pro-metastatic, and possibly CUP-specific.


Author(s):  
Rishu Mittal ◽  
Kundal Ramesh ◽  
Singh harpal ◽  
Deepika Gupta ◽  
Bhavleen Kaur ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 157 (2) ◽  
pp. 398-404
Author(s):  
Takashi Uehara ◽  
Hiroshi Yoshida ◽  
Mei Fukuhara ◽  
Masayuki Yoshida ◽  
Noriko Motoi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-114
Author(s):  
Akriti Bansal ◽  
Radhika Srinivasan ◽  
Manish Rohilla ◽  
Archana Sundaram ◽  
Bhavana Rai ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common ovarian malignancy. The role of cytopathology in obtaining tissue diagnosis before institution of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) was evaluated. Methods All histopathology-proven HGSC specimens between 2015 and 2018 with prior cytopathologic diagnosis by ascitic fluid evaluation or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of ovarian mass were reviewed with cell block immunocytochemistry for CK7, CK20, PAX8, WT1, and p53. Results Of 288 cases of HGSC, pre-NACT cytology diagnosis was established in 32% (93/288), with specific HGSC diagnoses made on ascitic fluid in 88% (82/93) and by ovarian mass FNA in 12% (11/93). The ascitic fluid showed moderate/high cellularity with papillary clusters in 76% (71/93) cases. Cell block immunocytochemistry showed tumor cells positive for CK7, PAX8, and WT1. p53 showed mutant or null-type positivity in 65% (33/51) and 33% (17/51) of cases, respectively, with 100% concordance with subsequent histopathology specimens. Poor/intermediate response to chemotherapy was shown in 75% of cases. Conclusions Combined assessment of cytomorphology, cell block histomorphology, and ancillary immunohistochemical testing, including PAX8, WT1, and p53, allows for specific pre-NACT diagnoses of HGSC in ascitic fluid and ovarian FNA cytology. This practice allows for initiation of chemotherapy and diminution of disease burden prior to definitive surgical therapy.


Author(s):  
Lionel Piroth ◽  
Andre Pechinot ◽  
Anne Minello ◽  
Benoit Jaulhac ◽  
Isabelle Patry ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document