Pencitraan Polemik Ekonomi Orang Melayu dalam Filem Abang

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-92
Author(s):  
Siti Normala Hamzah ◽  
Keyword(s):  

Artikel ini membicarakan isu dan polemik ekonomi masyarakat Melayu yang diangkat sebagai subjek dalam filem Abang (1981) arahan sutradara Rahim Razali. Secara umumnya orang Melayu mengalami perubahan dalam ekonomi yang ketara apabila kerajaan Malaysia mewujudkan Dasar Ekonomi Baru (DEB)pada tahun 1971 melalui Rancangan Malaysia kedua (RMK-2). Pembentukan dasar ini bertujuan untuk mewujudkan keseimbangan sosioekonomi kepada semua rakyat serta membentuk perpaduan antara kaum. Pelaksanaan DEB ini banyak membuka ruang kepada orang Melayu untuk mengambil peluang daripada pertumbuhan ekonomi negara yang pesat ketika itu namun secara tidak langsung transformasi ini juga telah mencetuskan konflik dan polemik baharu dalam kalangan orang Melayu. Filem yang dibuat selepas 10 tahun dasar baru ini dilancarkan secara dasarnya merupakan kritik sosial Rahim Razali terhadap masyarakat Melayu dalam era 80-an terutamanya yang berkaitan dengan jati diri serta cabaran semasa dalam menjunjung adat dan budaya bangsa. Kesemua pencitraan polemik ekonomi Orang Melayu telah diterjemahkan melalui watak-watak keluarga Dato’ Din manakala watak-watak orang kampung pula merupakan representasi realisme masyarakat Melayu yang tidak terkesan dengan transformasi ekonomi ini. Kajian ini menggunakan kaedah kualitatif iaitu dengan menganalisis teks sebagai kaedah kajian utama dan temubual serta pengumpulan data sekunder sebagai pendekatan tambahan. Pendekatan sosiologi sastera (Hippolyte Taine) juga digunakan untuk menganalisis hubungan langsung antara filem dengan zaman, ras dan milieunya. Kata kunci: Ekonomi, Dasar Ekonomi Baru (DEB), filem Rahim Razali, isu Melayu, jati diri.

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natascha Weschenbach
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 537-596
Author(s):  
Carlos S. Alvarado

There is a long history of discussions of mediumship as related to dissociation and the unconscious mind during the Nineteenth Century. After an overview of relevant ideas and observations from the mesmeric, hypnosis, and spiritualistic literatures, I focus on the writings of Jules Baillarger, Alfred Binet, Paul Blocq, Théodore Flournoy, Jules Héricourt, William James, Pierre Janet, Ambroise August Liébeault, Frederic W.H. Myers, Julian Ochorowicz, Charles Richet, Hippolyte Taine, Paul Tascher, and Edouard von Hartmann. While some of their ideas reduced mediumship solely to intra-psychic processes, others considered as well veridical phenomena. The speculations of these individuals, involving personation, and different memory states, were part of a general interest in the unconscious mind, and in automatisms, hysteria, and hypnosis during the period in question. Similar ideas continued into the Twentieth Century.


Books Abroad ◽  
1931 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 327
Author(s):  
Victor Giraud
Keyword(s):  

1978 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-205
Author(s):  
D. G. CHARLTON
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Joseph

Summary The key formative figure in the intellectual life of the young Ferdinand de Saussure was Adolphe Pictet (1799–1875), a family friend best remembered for his Les origines indo-européennes, ou Les Aryas primitifs: Essai de paléontologie linguistique (1859–1863). A review of its second edition written by Saussure two years after Pictet’s death contains a wealth of information about his life and work, including a description of his book Du beau, dans la nature, l’art et la poésie: Etudes esthétiques (1856). In it, Pictet makes clear that aesthetics is principally centred on the problem of the meaning of the word beauty, and that within this problem are to be found all the tensions between the rational and sensible, the intellectual and emotional, the subjective and objective, and intention and reaction, that are at the heart of the whole Enlightenment discourse on the nature of language. A number of remarks on regularity of form in nature, for example in crystallisation, find echoes in Saussure’s later characterisation of the language system, as do Pictet’s assertions about the arbitrary nature of the linguistic sign and about the signified being not a thing but a concept. Indeed, a number of ‘influences’ on Saussure which Aarsleff (1982) credited to Hippolyte Taine (1828–1893) – for whom we have no independent evidence of such influence – can more convincingly be ascribed to his early mentor Pictet. Du beau moreover provides a ‘missing link’ between the Enlightenment philosophers whose aesthetic views it details, and the traces of their philosophical positions that have repeatedly been detected in the Cours de linguistique générale.


1943 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-156
Author(s):  
Iredell Jenkins ◽  
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
Éric Gasparini
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document