SOIL SOLARIZATION WITH BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC FILM: TWO YEARS OF EXPERIMENTAL TESTS

2005 ◽  
pp. 717-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Russo ◽  
A. Candura ◽  
G. Scarascia-Mugnozza
2005 ◽  
pp. 201-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Castronuovo ◽  
V. Candido ◽  
S. Margiotta ◽  
C. Manera ◽  
V. Miccolis ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 769-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harsimran K. Gill ◽  
Robert McSorley ◽  
Danielle D. Treadwell

Soil solarization is an important practice for small-acreage farmers and home gardeners and is used commercially in areas with high solar radiation and air temperature during the summer. In this technique, clear plastic films are used to increase soil temperature to manage soil-borne plant pests such as insects, diseases, nematodes, fungi, and weeds. Several different kinds of plastic films were evaluated in 2007 and 2008 for durability, weather tolerance, and weed suppression. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with five replications. In 2007, treatments were four clear plastic films including: ISO, VeriPack, Poly Pak, Bromostop®, and a white plastic control. In 2008, treatments were Polydak®, Poly Pak, Bromostop®, and white plastic. Films were evaluated for weed suppression based on the population density of weeds that emerged through breaks in the plastic, for durability in terms of number and size of breaks in the films, and for the total exposed soil area resulting from breaks. Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) was the major weed problem throughout both years. In both years, total exposed area was greater with white plastic and Bromostop® (81.5 ft2/bed) compared with other plastic films (<21.5 ft2/bed). Due to their durability, Poly Pak, ISO, and VeriPack suppressed nutsedge more than Bromostop and white plastic. Although a number of very small (<0.75 inch long) breaks were observed in Polydak® plastic film, they never increased in size, and this plastic film remained intact throughout the experiment and provided excellent weed control.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinhao Xue ◽  
Tuo Jin ◽  
Chengyu Gao ◽  
Chongxiao Li ◽  
Tao Zhou ◽  
...  

Abstract The spread of biodegradable plastic film (BDFs) not only increase grain yield but also reduce the environmental pollution from plastic film to a large extent. Soil microbes have been considered to be involved in biodegradation processes. However, the study of microbes diversity in soil mulched with biodegradable plastic film remains limited. Here, we compared the diversity of microbes between soils with biodegradable film and non-biodegradable film (NBDF) mulch. The results showed that BDFs affected on the soil quality parameters, such as total C, P and NH4+-N, but also on the microbes species richness (ACE; Chao1) and diversity (Simpson index; Shannon index). In terms of dominant phyla and genera, BDFs and NBDF can influence the abundance of disparate species. Furthermore, BDFs could also contribute to improve the richness of the important functional bacterial groups in soil, e.g. Pedomicrobium and Comamonas, both of which have been found to be involved in the degradation of plastic residues in soil. Finally, we found that BDFs improved the transformation of nitrogen through increased significantly the abundances of Nitrobacter and Nitrospira. Our results highlight the impact of BDFs mulch on the abundance of functional bacteria in the soil.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-167
Author(s):  
Jung-Gu Han ◽  
◽  
Seung Joon Park ◽  
Sung Taek Chung ◽  
Fanzhu Li ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. e0236579
Author(s):  
Christian Lott ◽  
Andreas Eich ◽  
Boris Unger ◽  
Dorothée Makarow ◽  
Glauco Battagliarin ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
pp. 259-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hetzroni ◽  
A. Grinstein ◽  
Y. Alper ◽  
H. Frankel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document