CROP LOAD MANAGEMENT OF TREE FRUITS IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST OF USA

2011 ◽  
pp. 759-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.R. Schmidt ◽  
T.D. Auvil ◽  
I. Hanrahan ◽  
F. Castillo ◽  
J.R. McFerson
HortScience ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 554e-555
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Williams

Use of exogenous bioregulators (“hormones”) to adjust crop load in apple remains challenging to both researchers and producers. These hormones are sensitive to the rate and timing of application, to the physiological status of the tree, the choice of orchard system, variety and rootstock, and a myriad of cultural practices and environmental factors. All classes of plant bioregulators have been used over the past 30 to 40 years as chemical thinning materials. Most of the standard postbloom thinning programs involve application of a synthetic auxin, such as naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) in combination with carbaryl, a commonly used insecticide. The mode of action of these two compounds is not clearly understood. Gibberellins generally have not been effective thinning materials because of the negative impact on return bloom. Ethylene-releasing compounds have been used successfully as postbloom thinning materials. And cytokinins, particularly synthetic sources such as 6-BA, have been shown to effectively thin fruit and to enhance fruit size on many commercial varieties. The rate and timing of 6-BA applications are particularly critical to obtain the desirable thinning and size responses. Overall, these bioregulators are sensitive to temperature. The use of bloom thinning compounds and their efficacy in the Pacific Northwest will be discussed in the context of return bloom.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 452
Author(s):  
Margaret H. Massie ◽  
Todd M. Wilson ◽  
Anita T. Morzillo ◽  
Emilie B. Henderson

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob L. Strunk ◽  
Constance A. Harrington ◽  
Leslie C. Brodie ◽  
Janet S. Prevéy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document