Effect of Cut-Off Points on Performance of Laser Fluorescence for Detecting Occlusal Caries

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Braga ◽  
Fausto Mendes ◽  
José Carlos Imparato ◽  
Célia Rodrigues

This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the influence of cut-off points on the performance of laser fluorescence(LF) in detecting occlusal caries in permanent and primary teeth. The use of different cut-off points influenced the performance of LF device in detection of occlusal caries in both kind of teeth, but the performance in permanent teeth suffered more influence from variation of cut-off points scales than in primary group.

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisele Angnes ◽  
Vivian Angnes ◽  
Rosa Helena Miranda Grande ◽  
Márcio Battistella ◽  
Alessandro Dourado Loguercio ◽  
...  

The reduction in caries prevalence has not occurred uniformly for all dental surfaces. As the occlusal surfaces are still the most likely sites for the development of lesions, new methods of diagnosis are still being evaluated. This study compared a laser fluorescence (LF) system (DIAGNOdent) with the Ekstrand’s visual system for in vitro detection of occlusal caries. A total of 57 extracted molars with macroscopically intact occlusal surfaces were selected. Two-examiners assessed 110 sites by visual inspection (VI) and LF. After ten days from the first measurement, all teeth were re-evaluated through the same methods by each examiner. Caries extension was histologically assessed (X 40). The methods were compared by means of sensitivity, specificity, intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility and area under the ROC curve. The kappa’s test showed good intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility for both methods. VI and LF showed similar sensitivities for both examiners, however, VI showed higher specificities than LF. The overall analysis, as demonstrated by the area under the ROC curve, showed that VI had a better performance than the LF device. It was concluded that the Ekstrand’s visual system is more reliable than the LF device. LF should be considered only as an adjuvant for occlusal caries diagnosis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eldesouky Heba I. ◽  
Hanno Azza G. ◽  
Bakry Niveen S. ◽  
Ahmed Dawlat M.

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 312-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monticha Rangcharoen ◽  
Varisara Sirimaharaj ◽  
Sitthichai Wanachantararak ◽  
Noppakun Vongsavan ◽  
Bruce Matthews

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document