scholarly journals Cryptocurrency Turnover as an Object of Crime and Doctrinal Errors in its Perception

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 118-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya. O. Kuchina
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Danko

The work is carried out on the basis of special methods of knowledge, including historical-legal, logical, formal-legal. In the article, taking into account scientific sources and practical experience, the legal problems of operative-search counteraction to crimes provided for in Article 290-291.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are considered. The analysis of bribery is realized jointly, because there are identical characteristics in all its corpus delicties – the same subject and object of crime. The existing norms of criminal and criminal procedure laws in relation to bribery are analyzed. Principal operative-search measures used in documentation of bribery are determined. They are surveillance and operational experiment. Their difference is justified and successful use examples are examined. An actual statistics of the Komi Republic for 2015-2018 is given. The lack of normative securing for interaction between operational subdivisions and preliminary investigation body is ascertained. Based on personal practical experience some measures to counteract bribery are proposed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Виктор Винокуров ◽  
Viktor Vinokurov
Keyword(s):  

Teisė ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 137-148
Author(s):  
Pranas Švedas

Straipsnyje nagrinėjami aktualūs Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo kodekso 192 straipsnio interpreta­vimo aspektai: aptariamas nusikaltimo sudėčių, esančių BK 192 straipsnyje, klausimas bei pateikiama mokslinių argumentų, ką reikėtų laikyti BK 192 straipsnyje uždraustos veikos (nusikaltimo) dalyku. Taip pat pateikiama siūlymų, kokiomis kryptimis, autoriaus nuomone, reikėtų tobulinti patį BK 192 staipsnį. The article discusses relevant aspects of interpretation of Article 192 of Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania: discusses bodies of crimes in Article 192 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania and proposes scholastic arguments regarding object of crime. In addition the article gives proposals for how to improve Article 192 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania.


Author(s):  
Gennady Novoselov ◽  
Lyudmila Fedoseeva

The article challenges the current notions in the legal literature about the identity or insignificance of the differences of the object of criminal law protection and the object of a crime. In this regard, an attention is focused on the specifics of the functions performed by them as part of a crime. The authors argue that a crime causes and can cause harm only to what is put under criminal law protection. Advocating the non-identity of concepts of criminal harm and criminal consequences, the authors conclude that there are significant differences not only in scope, but also in the content of the concepts of the object of criminal law protection and the object of crime. The first one always reflects some value able to meet someone’s needs and is exposed to illegal influence (treatment), and thus needs criminal law protection. The second one characterizes the person to whom these values belong, and to whom illegal handling of such values causes or is capable of causing criminal harm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document