Customary International Law and International Human Rights Law: A Proposal for the Expansion of the Alien Tort Statute

International Human Rights Law has emerged as an academic subject in its own right, separate from, but still related to, International Law. This book explains the distinctive nature of the new discipline by examining the influence of the moral concept of human rights on general international law. Rather than make use of moral philosophy or political theory, the work explains the term ‘human rights’ by examining its usage in international law practice, on the understanding that words are given meaning through their use. Relying on complexity theory to make sense of the legal practice in the United Nations, the core human rights treaties, and customary international law, The Idea of International Human Rights Law shows how a moral concept of human rights emerged, and then influenced the international law doctrine and practice on human rights, a fact that explains the fragmentation of international law and the special nature of International Human Rights Law.

Download Full-text

Jurisdictional Immunities of the State for Serious Violations of International Human Rights Law or the Law of Armed Conflict

Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international ◽

10.1017/s0069005800010857 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 50 ◽

pp. 243-287 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Paul David Mora

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Armed Conflict ◽

The State ◽

International Human Rights Law ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

International Human Rights ◽

Customary International Law ◽

Law Of Armed Conflict ◽

International Human

SummaryIn its recent decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy: Greece Intervening), the International Court of Justice (ICJ) held that Italy had failed to respect immunities enjoyed by Germany under international law when the Italian courts allowed civil actions to be brought against Germany for alleged violations of international human rights law (IHRL) and the law of armed conflict (LOAC) committed during the Second World War. This article evaluates the three arguments raised by Italy to justify its denial of immunity: first, that peremptory norms of international law prevail over international rules on jurisdictional immunities; second, that customary international law recognizes an exception to immunity for serious violations of IHRL or the LOAC; and third, that customary international law recognizes an exception to immunity for torts committed by foreign armed forces on the territory of the forum state in the course of an armed conflict. The author concludes that the ICJ was correct to find that none of these arguments deprived Germany of its right under international law to immunity from the civil jurisdiction of the Italian courts.

Download Full-text

4. Human Rights in International Law

Human Rights: Politics and Practice ◽

10.1093/hepl/9780198708766.003.0005 ◽

2016 ◽

Author(s):

Rhona K. M. Smith

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

International Human Rights Law ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

International Human Rights ◽

Customary International Law ◽

Legal Context ◽

National Human ◽

International Human ◽

United Nations System

This chapter examines the international legal context of human rights. It first considers the historical evolution of international human rights law, with particular emphasis on the reincarnation of philosophical ideals as international laws (treaties), before discussing the principal sources of international human rights law such as customary international law and ‘soft’ law. It then describes the various forms of expressing human rights, along with the core international human rights instruments. It also explores the mechanisms for monitoring and enforcing human rights, including the United Nations system, regional human rights systems, and national human rights systems. Finally, it explains the process followed for a state wishing to be bound to the provisions of a treaty and the benefits of listing human rights in treaties.

Download Full-text

Armed Groups and Customary International Human Rights Law

10.1093/oso/9780198808381.003.0011 ◽

2017 ◽

Author(s):

Katharine Fortin

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

International Human Rights Law ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

Armed Groups ◽

International Human Rights ◽

Customary International Law ◽

Legal Obligations ◽

International Human

Chapter 11 analyses arguments that armed groups are bound by human rights law by virtue of customary international law. In doing so, the chapter draws together theories that have been explored in Chapters 7 and 9 about the relevance of territory to the acquisition of legal obligations. The chapter starts by examining the debates about how customary international human rights law binding upon armed groups should be constituted, finding that it will be formed through State practice and opinio juris. It ends by examining different articulations of the theory that armed groups are bound by customary international law by accountability mechanisms, evaluating their credence and making suggestions for their improvement.

Download Full-text

A Human Rights View of Maritime Piracy Law: Exploring the Gulf of Guinea

Groningen Journal of International Law ◽

10.21827/grojil.9.1.1-22 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 1-22

Author(s):

Ramat Tobi Abudu

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Economic Recession ◽

Current Approach ◽

International Human Rights Law ◽

Gulf Of Guinea ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

International Human Rights ◽

Customary International Law ◽

International Human

As a result of pirates’ unique modus operandi in the Gulf of Guinea (GoG), the current approach to counter-piracy is mainly securitised and repressive. This approach follows the international provisions on piracy framed based on the customary international law categorising pirates as “enemy of mankind”; which, considering the vicious nature of the crime, is quite justified. Moreover, the increase in piracy activities at sea within the GoG is foreseeable considering the economic recession faced by countries within the region due to the Covid-19 pandemic. This prediction calls for the strengthening of law enforcement operations at sea, which must be justifiable in international human rights law in order to ensure the protection of all persons. Thus, reviewing the current piracy laws and their coherence with international human rights law is a requisite. This paper recognises the repressive counter-piracy approach’s success, but takes a glance from a human rights lens, which raises questions relating to “lawfulness”. Consequently, this paper builds on the existing literature criticising the repressive policy towards countering piracy in the GoG. It also advances the research probing the alignment of counter-piracy operations with human rights obligations. This paper additionally takes it a step further by evaluating the piracy laws in the GoG and their alignment with human rights provisions. These findings set a new course towards a more sustainable approach to countering piracy in the GoG, balancing rights and security approaches towards ensuring the protection of lives at sea.

Download Full-text

The Review of Articles from Korea International Law Review (Vol. 1-49): International Human Rights Law

Korea International Law Review ◽

10.25197/kilr.2018.51.45 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 51 ◽

pp. 45-62

Author(s):

Buhm Suk Baek

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

International Human Rights Law ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

International Human Rights ◽

International Human

Download Full-text

Governmental human rights focal points in federal contexts: The implementation of the Istanbul convention in Switzerland as a case study

Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights ◽

10.1177/09240519211016947 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 092405192110169

Author(s):

Matthieu Niederhauser

Keyword(s):

Domestic Violence ◽

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

International Human Rights Law ◽

Focal Points ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

International Human Rights ◽

Federal States ◽

International Human

The implementation of international human rights law in federal States is an underexplored process. Subnational entities regularly enjoy a degree of sovereignty, which raises questions such as whether they implement obligations of international law and how the federal level may ensure that implementation takes place at the subnational level. This article aims to answer these questions, using the implementation of the Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Convention) in Switzerland as a case study. To implement the Convention at the cantonal level, federal actors decided to use networks of civil servants in charge of domestic violence issues, who act as governmental human rights focal points (GHRFPs). This article is based on original empirical data, on 25 interviews with State officials who participate in this implementation. The findings show how complex GHRFPs networks work in practice to implement the Convention and highlight the role played by numerous non-legal State actors in this process. As a result, the article argues that international human rights law implementation becomes more diversified both within and across federal States.

Download Full-text

Judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada of February 28, 2020, on Nevsun v. Araya: a “quiet revolution” in the assessment of the status of corporations under public international law?

Meždunarodnoe pravosudie ◽

10.21128/2226-2059-2021-2-25-39 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (2) ◽

pp. 25-39

Author(s):

Vera Rusinova ◽

Olga Ganina

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Supreme Court ◽

International Law ◽

Supreme Court Of Canada ◽

International Human Rights Law ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

International Human Rights ◽

Public International Law ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

International Human

The article analyses the Judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada on the Nevsun v. Araya case, which deals with the severe violations of human rights, including slavery and forced labor with respect of the workers of Eritrean mines owned by a Canadian company “Nevsun”. By a 5 to 4 majority, the court concluded that litigants can seek compensation for the violations of international customs committed by a company. This decision is underpinned by the tenets that international customs form a part of Canadian common law, companies can bear responsibility for violations of International Human Rights Law, and under ubi jus ibi remedium principle plaintiffs have a right to receive compensation under national law. Being a commentary to this judgment the article focuses its analysis on an issue that is of a key character for Public International Law, namely on the tenet that international customs impose obligations to respect human rights on companies and they can be called for responsibility for these violations. This conclusion is revolutionary in the part in which it shifts the perception of the companies’ legal status under International Law. The court’s approach is critically assessed against its well-groundness and correspondence to the current stage of International law. In particular, the authors discuss, whether the legal stance on the Supreme Court of Canada, under which companies can bear responsibility for violations of International Human Rights Law is a justified necessity or a head start.

Download Full-text

IS THE PRINCIPAL FUNCTION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW TO ADDRESS THE PATHOLOGIES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW? A COMMENT ON PATRICK MACKLEM’S THE SOVEREIGNTY OF HUMAN RIGHTS

University of Toronto Law Journal ◽

10.3138/utlj.67.7 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 67 (4) ◽

pp. 623-636 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Christopher McCrudden

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

International Human Rights Law ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

Principal Function ◽

International Human Rights ◽

International Human

Download Full-text

Rescuing Asylum-Seeker Stranded at Sea: Malaysia’s Duty under International Law

International Journal of Engineering & Technology ◽

10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18224 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 7 (3.30) ◽

pp. 182

Author(s):

Syafiq Sulaiman ◽

Salawati Mat Basir ◽

Mohd Zamre Mohd Zahir

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Asylum Seekers ◽

Law Of The Sea ◽

International Human Rights Law ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

Right To Life ◽

International Human Rights ◽

International Human ◽

The Right

The protection of the right to life and the duty to rescue persons in distress at sea are the fundamental obligations under two specialized international law regimes which are the international human rights law and the law of the sea. These rules when read together form a strong protection of the human rights of the asylum-seekers stranded at sea. However, often states failed to honour this obligation for various reasons ranging from national security to economic reasons. This article will analyse Malaysia’s responsibilities as regards the right to life and the duty to rescue of these asylum-seekers. It will also identify the existing international and domestic legal framework relevant to the application of these obligations upon Malaysia and whether it has acted in breach of such obligations. The article then proceeded with suggestions for further improvement that Malaysia can adopt in order to better perform its obligations. This study is a pure doctrinal legal research which is qualitative in nature. The data used in this research is collected from library-based resources. These data were then analyzed by using methods of content analysis as well as critical analysis. The article found that Malaysia has a duty to protect the right to life under international human rights law. Additionally, Malaysia is also bound under the law of the sea to perform its duty to rescue. In view of Malaysia’s failure to perform these duties in two occasions in the past consequently had resulted in a violation of international law. Therefore, it is suggested that Malaysia should initiate a revision of its national laws and policies regarding treatment of asylum-seekers stranded at sea to be in line with Malaysia’s duty under international law. Besides, the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency is call upon to comply with the international standards of treatment of persons in distress at sea which includes the asylum-seekers.

Download Full-text