scholarly journals The Cumulative Effects of Televised Debates on Voters’ Assessments of Candidates across Red, Blue, and Purple Political Battlegrounds in the 2012 American Presidential Election

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-239
Author(s):  
Hyun Jung Yun ◽  
Amy Jasperson ◽  
Blake Farrar
2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 526-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan S. Brett

In one of the televised debates among Republican primary candidates for the 2012 U.S. presidential election, moderator Wolf Blitzer presented this hypothetical case to candidate Ron Paul:A healthy 30 year old young man has a good job, makes a good living, but decides — you know what — ‘I’m not going to spend 200 or 300 dollars a month for health insurance because I’m healthy, I don’t need it.’ But something terrible happens, all of a sudden he needs it. Who’s going to pay if he goes into a coma?Paul, known for his libertarian views, initially responded that the patient “should assume responsibility for himself,” and that he should have purchased a major medical policy before he became ill.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-348
Author(s):  
Hansoo Lee ◽  
Jae-Mook Lee

This study examines the effects of viewing televised debates on political engagement. Voters consume information while viewing television debates, which can affect political engagement in a positive manner. Examining the effects of debates on political engagement, we analyze panel survey data from the 2012 Korean presidential election. According to the results, voters who view more televised debates are more likely to search for information and discuss political issues with others. The results provide evidence that viewing televised debates tends to enhance civic engagement.


Author(s):  
Richard Johnston ◽  
Michael G. Hagen ◽  
Kathleen Hall Jamieson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document