scholarly journals Suture less 3D mesh repair of sliding inguinal hernia: a case report

2016 ◽  
pp. 3068-3070
Author(s):  
Abhijit Bagul ◽  
Qurratulain Chougle ◽  
Meena Kumar ◽  
Nandkishore Nandkishore ◽  
Naseem Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
3D Mesh ◽  
Sliding Inguinal Hernia

scholarly journals Amyand’s hernia: a case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 2072
Author(s):  
Gawade Harshad Namdev ◽  
Padale Sanjay ◽  
Shetty Varun ◽  
Deshpande Padnanabh
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Amyand’S Hernia ◽  
Rare Entity ◽  
Hernia Sac ◽  
Tension Free ◽  
History Of

Amyand’s hernia is a rare pathology of an appendix with or without inflammation within the hernia sac is named after the French born English surgeon Dr. Claudius Amyand. We hereby present a case report of this rare entity known as a type 2 Amyand’s hernia. A 64 years old male, who had had a left-sided inguinal hernia for the previous 5 years, presented with a 2-day-history of fever, pain, vomiting, and irreducibility of the hernia. Upon exploration an irreducible inguinal hernia with appendix as its content was identified. Appendectomy was performed followed by a tension free mesh repair of the underlying hernia. Consequently, our recommendation is that the decision to perform an appendectomy and/or to use mesh to repair hernias should always be individualized.

Sliding Inguinal Hernia Containing the Ureter: A Case Report

1996 ◽  
Vol 155 (4) ◽  
pp. 1387-1387 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Zmora ◽  
P.P. Schachter
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Sliding Inguinal Hernia

scholarly journals Laparoscopy-assisted Hernioplasty for A Recurrent Inguinal Hernia after Mesh Repair: A Case Report

2006 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-346
Author(s):  
Hirofumi Tsutsumi ◽  
Izumi Takeyoshi ◽  
Naoki Tomizawa ◽  
Yutaka Sunose ◽  
Susumu Kawate ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Recurrent Inguinal Hernia

Outcome of tension free open mesh repair of inguinal hernia

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24
Author(s):  
Mohammad Masum ◽  
Md Aminul Islam ◽  
Masflque Ahmed Bhuiyan ◽  
Kazi Mazharul Lslam ◽  
Md Selim Morshed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Groin Hernia ◽  
Synthetic Mesh ◽  
Indirect Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Prolene Mesh ◽  
Tension Free ◽  
Open Mesh Repair

Background: In the practice of General Surgery, hernia repair is the second most common procedure after appendectomy. Several methods have been developed over the years to try to improve hernia repair. Good result can be expected using Bassini's, McVay's, Shouldice's techniques provided the exact nature of hernia is recognized and the repair is done without tension using healthy tissue. The introduction of synthetic mesh started a new era in hernia surgery. The use of synthetic mesh repair of primary and recurrent hernias has gradually gained acceptance among surgeons. Objective: To find out the outcome and complications of open inguinal hernia repair with prolene mesh. Methods: This is a prospective cross sectional study conducted at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, from December, 2011 to May, 2012. One hundred patients of inguinal hernia admitted in different surgical units of BSMMU, Dhaka for elective surgery were studied. We have given 1 gm ijv Cephradine per operatively and then 500 gm cephradine ijv 6 hourly for 24 hours followed by oral form of Cephradine for next 5 days. Polypropylene mesh of 11 cm x 7 cm size was used in all cases. All the operations were done by open tension free prolene mesh repair technique. Patients were followed for one year to see the outcome. Results: Out of 100 cases of inguinal hernia, 71 patients (71%) had indirect inguinal hernia and 29 cases (29%) had direct inguinal hernia; 90 cases (90%) were primary hernia and only 10 cases (10%) were recurrent hernia; 58 cases were right sided, 34 cases (34%) were left sided and 8 cases (8%) were bilateral. Complications of mesh repair of groin hernia in this study included wound infection (5%), scrotal oedema (2%), mesh infection (0%), scrotal hematoma (2%), echymoces of peri-incisional skin (5%), early wound and groin pain (7%), chronic inguinodynia (2%), hernia recurrence (1%). Conclusion: In the present study an attempt is made to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair by prolene mesh. The results confirm that Lichtenstein tension free mesh repair of inguinal hernia is safe and reliable for both primary and recurrent groin hernia, with less recurrence rate. Patient's compliance was good with minimum morbidity. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2018) Vol. 22 (1): 21-24

Lichtenstein Versus Desarda’s Technique of Hernia Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-103
Author(s):  
Md Fardhus ◽  
AMSM Sharfuzzaman ◽  
Md Nayeem Dewan ◽  
Md Abul Hossain ◽  
Ahmed Sami Al Hasan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Seroma Formation ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Serous Fluid ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
And Gender

Aim: To compare Desarda’s versus Lichtenstein’s mesh repair in patients with unilateral, primary, reducible inguinal hernia in terms of mean operative time and seroma formation Methods: This randomized control trial conducted at Department of Surgery, Patuakhali Medical College & Hospital, Patuakhali. Eighty patients with unilateral, primary, reducible inguinal hernia were randomly distributed into two groups to undergo hernia repair i.e. Lichtenstein (L) and Desarda’s (D). Outcome was measured in terms of mean operative time and seroma formation. Seroma formation was defined as presence of enclosed cavity containing serous fluid determined by ultrasonography at 30th post-operative day. Results: Thirty three patients (41.25%) were above 50 years of age, whereas remaining 47 patients (58.75%) were below 50 years of age. Five patients (6.25%) were female and 75 patients(93.75%) were male. Seroma formation was 5% in Desarda’s group while 7.5% in Lichtenstein group (P> 0.05). Similarly difference in mean operative time was statistically non-significant. Seroma formation was common in older age group. There was no effect of smoking, obesity, operative time and gender on seroma formation. Conclusion: It is concluded that there is no difference in frequency of seroma formation and mean operative time in Desarda’s or Lichtenstein’s technique of hernia repair. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2018) Vol. 22 (2) : 99-103

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document