P004 TREATMENT OF RECURRENT INGUINAL HERNIA AFTER TRANSINGUINAL PREPERITONEAL (TIPP) SURGERY

Aim To report feasibility and surgical outcomes of recurrent inguinal hernia repair after TransInguinal PrePeritoneal (TIPP) repair. Material and Methods Patients who underwent recurrent IHR after TIPP between January 2013 and January 2015 in a single hernia-dedicated teaching hospital were included. Exclusion criteria were femoral hernia, incarcerated hernia and reasons for unreliable follow-up. Electronic medical records were assessed retrospectively to register surgical outcomes and complications. Results Thirty-three patients underwent surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernia after TIPP. Twenty patients were treated with a “re-TIPP when possible” strategy; resulting in 13 successful re-tipps and 7 conversions to Lichtenstein repair. Eleven patients underwent primarily a Lichtenstein’s repair, the remaining two patients underwent recurrent IHR using other techniques (transrectus sheath Pre-Peritoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal repair). Mean time of surgery was 44.7 minutes (standard deviation 16.7). There was one patient (3.0%) with a re-recurrent inguinal hernia during follow-up. Other minor complications included urinary tract infection. There were no significant differences in post-operative results between the different surgical techniques used for recurrent IHR. Conclusions These results indicate that after TIPP it is feasible and safe to perform re-surgery for recurrence with an anterior approach again. For these recurrences, a Lichtenstein can be performed, or a ‘re-TIPP if possible’ strategy can be applied by experienced TIPP surgeons. Whether a re-TIPP has the same advantages over Lichtenstein as is for primary inguinal hernia surgery, needs to be evaluated in a prospective manner.

Comparative Study between Laparoscopic versus Open Hernioplasty in Repair of Unilateral Non Recurrent Inguinal Hernia

Background Laparoscopic surgery has led to many changes in the management of surgical patients and significantly reduced the incidence of complications associated with open surgical procedures 1. At present, laparoscopic hernia repair has gained clinical significance in patients with bilateral or recurrent hernia. 2 Objectives The aim of this study is to compare open hernioplasty and laparoscopic hernia repair in unilateral non recurrent inguinal hernia. The present study will be performed on 30 patients to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic hernia repair and open hernioplasty and to assess the intra operative and post-operative complications, duration of surgery, hospital stay, postoperative morbidity, recurrence and patient satisfaction. Patients and Methods . Comparative studies on 30 patients were classified according the type of operative technique into 2 groups: Group A patients underwent laparoscopic technique (15 patients), group B patients underwent open technique (15 patients) to evaluate and compare the open and laparoscopic techniques in unilateral non recurrent inguinal hernia repair as regard operative time,post operative pain, hospital stay, urine retention, parathesia, numbness, seroma,, wound infection and recurrence Results Our study revealed highly significant increase in operative time in laparoscopic group; compared to open group of patients; with highly significant statistical difference (p value < 0.0001), highly significant decrease in post-operative pain score in laparoscopic group; compared to open group of patients; with highly significant statistical difference. (p value = 0.00434),highly significant decrease in postoperative hospital stay in laparoscopic group; compared to open group of patients; with highly significant statistical difference. (p value = 0.000003), significant decrease in post operative parathesia and numbness in laparoscopic group; compared to open group of patients; (p value =0.000414),highly significant decrease in post-operative urine retention in laparoscopic group; compared to open group of patients; with highly significant statistical difference (p value= 0.000267). Conclusion The laparoscopic technique is superior to the open technique of tensionfree repair, in terms of immediate post-operative complications and delayed pain and paresthesia also in terms of safety.

Migration of a mesh into the colon after inguinal hernia repair – a case report

Introduction: Mesh migration is one of the least common complications that arise after inguinal hernia repair with a mesh. Only small case series have been reported, and an understanding of this issue is limited due to a lack of data. Most of the cases were treated surgically. In this paper, we wish to present the potential of treating this condition using endoscopic techniques. Case report: A male patient underwent transabdominal preperitoneal repair of a primary inguinal hernia in 1999. In 2003, the patient required the same procedure for a recurrent inguinal hernia. Twenty years after the primary hernia repair, the patient had a positive faecal occult blood test but was completely asymptomatic. A colonoscopy revealed mesh migration into the sigmoid colon. Despite multiple attempts to remove the mesh endoscopically, endoscopic treatment was unsuccessful. The migrated mesh was surgically removed and obligatory resection of the sigmoid colon was carried out. Apart from wound infection (Clavien-Dindo IIIb), the postoperative course was uneventful. Conclusion: In our case, the mesh that had penetrated the colon could not be removed endoscopically. Despite our experience, it is advisable to attempt endoscopic removal of mesh that has migrated into a hollow intra-abdominal viscus.

Outcomes of primary and recurrent inguinal hernia repair with prosthetic mesh in a single region over 15 years

Background Sutured inguinal hernia repairs are now uncommon, with evidence suggesting that those augmented with mesh are associated with a lower recurrence rate. We aimed to explore the suggestion that the established use of mesh does indeed lower the rate of operation for recurrence in a single National Health Service region. Method We collected retrospective Office of Population Censuses and Surveys coded data across one region of all primary and recurrent inguinal hernia repairs over 15 years (2004–2019). Electronic records of recurrent repairs were scrutinised to identify year and type of previous primary repair. Results In total, 7,234 repairs were performed during this time, of which 289 (4%) were for symptomatic recurrence. Operations for primary repair increased year on year (111 in 2004 to 402 in 2019). Frequency of operation for recurrent herniation declined with increasing use of mesh (8.8% in 2004 to 3.5% in 2019). The majority of repairs (73%) for recurrence were by an open approach. As opposed to an open mesh repair, a primary laparoscopic repair was associated with an earlier recurrence. Conclusions Inguinal hernia repairs are increasing in frequency but operations for later symptomatic recurrence following an open primary prosthetic mesh repair are not.

Management of an obstructed recurrent inguinal hernia using a hybrid method: a case report

Background For recurrent incarcerated and strangulated hernias, the optimal treatment strategy for each case is needed. Case presentation The study patient was a 70-year-old man. TAPP repair was performed for a left inguinal hernia (JHS Classification II-1) 7 years earlier. The patient experienced transient pain and swelling of the left inguinal region for 5 months and visited our emergency department for abdominal pain and vomiting. A CT scan showed a recurrent left inguinal hernia and small bowel incarceration, and emergency surgery was performed. Laparoscopic observation of the abdominal cavity revealed recurrent left inguinal hernia (Rec II-1) with small bowel incarceration. The small bowel was reduced after pneumoperitoneum, and no findings suggested intestinal tract necrosis. Adhesions around the herniated sac were dissected using an extraperitoneal approach and then shifted to mesh plug repair. No perioperative complications or hernia recurrence were observed in the 10 months after the surgery. Conclusions This report describes a novel, successful surgical treatment for a recurrent incarcerated hernia. In our patient, we could easily perform dissection and understand the positional relationship by hybrid surgery using the TEP method. Additionally, in patients with incarcerated hernias, we believe that performing hybrid surgery by combining the TEP method would be useful because bowel dilation caused by intestinal obstruction would not disturb the operative field.