scholarly journals Thoracodorsal artery perforator flap in immediate breast reconstruction: a series of twenty cases

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 205
Author(s):  
Thyagaraj Reddy ◽  
Vashisht Dikshit ◽  
Balgangadhara Tilak ◽  
Ganesh M. S.
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Immediate Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Ablative Surgery ◽  
Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flap ◽  
Flap Elevation

Background: The management of breast cancer has shown a progressive change, from radical ablative surgery, to breast conserving techniques. Traditionally, the mini latissimus dorsi flap has been used for reconstruction; which is associated with donor site morbidity. Vascular research has now allowed the use of perforator-based flaps for reconstruction, which reduce donor site morbidity.Methods: Twenty thoracodorsal perforator flaps in twenty early breast cancer patients were studied between January 2018 and December 2018. Parameters studied were adequacy of volume, ease and time taken for flap elevation, and final aesthetic outcome.Results: Flap volume was adequate to fill defect. One of twenty cases had flap loss due to venous congestion secondary to pedicle kinking. Average time taken for flap elevation was 70.45 minutes. All patients were satisfied with cosmetic outcome.Conclusions: The TDAP flap is a safe and reliable flap which provides adequate volume for partial breast reconstruction. 

Breast Reconstruction with the Latissimus Dorsi Flap

2019 ◽  
pp. 677-694
Author(s):  
Michael Klebuc ◽  
Elizabeth Killion ◽  
Jesse Selber ◽  
Gregory R. D. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Latissimus Dorsi ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Thoracodorsal Artery ◽  
Flap Design ◽  
Muscle Sparing ◽  
Endoscopic Assistance ◽  
Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flap

Latissimus dorsi muscle and myocutaneous flaps provide a versatile means of providing both implant-based and pure autologous breast reconstructions. The technique is well suited to lean patients and those with contraindications to the use of the lower abdomen as a donor site. The technique has been progressively refined over time to provide concealed scars and to reduce donor site morbidity. The use of endoscopic assistance, robotic flap harvest, muscle-sparing flap design, and perforator flaps based on the thoracodorsal vascular access (the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap or TAP-flap), continue to increase the utility of this donor site for breast reconstruction.

scholarly journals Autologous Unilateral Breast Reconstruction with Venous Supercharged IMAP-Flaps: A Step by Step Guide of the Split Breast Technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 3030
Author(s):  
Kathrin Bachleitner ◽  
Laurenz Weitgasser ◽  
Amro Amr ◽  
Thomas Schoeller
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Free Tissue Transfer ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Aesthetic Result ◽  
Secondary Operations

Various techniques for breast reconstruction ranging from reconstruction with implants to free tissue transfer, with the disadvantage of either carrying a foreign body or dealing with donor site morbidity, have been described. In patients who had a unilateral mastectomy and offer a contralateral mamma hypertrophy a breast reconstruction can be performed with the excess tissue from the hypertrophic side using the split breast technique. Here a local internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap of the hypertrophic breast can be used for reconstruction avoiding the downsides of implants or a microsurgical reconstruction and simultaneously reducing the enlarged donor breast in order to achieve symmetry. Methods: Between April 2010 and February 2019 the split breast technique was performed in five patients after mastectomy due to breast cancer. Operating time, length of stay, complications and the need for secondary operations were analyzed and the surgical technique including flap supercharging were described in detail. Results: All five IMAP-flaps survived and an aesthetically pleasant result could be achieved using the split breast technique. An average of two secondary corrections to achieve better symmetry were necessary after each breast reconstruction. Complications included venous flap congestion, partial flap necrosis and asymmetry. No breast cancer recurrence was recorded. An overall approval of the surgical technique among patients was observed. Conclusions: The use of the contralateral breast for unilateral total breast reconstruction represents an additional highly useful technique for selected patients, is safe and reliable results can be achieved. Although this technique is carried out as a single-stage procedure, including breast reduction and reconstruction at the same time, secondary operations may be necessary to achieve superior symmetry and a satisfying aesthetic result. Survival of the IMAP-flaps can be improved by venous supercharging of the flaps onto the thoracoepigastric vein.

Alternative flaps for microsurgical breast reconstruction

2021 ◽  
pp. 1107-1114
Author(s):  
Hinne A. Rakhorst
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
The Body ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator ◽  
Muscle Sparing ◽  
Breast Reconstructive Surgery

Microsurgery in general has made dramatic improvements over the past decades. This applies to microsurgery in general and to breast reconstructive surgery especially. The demand for autologous breast reconstruction has risen. Since the introduction of the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps, through the muscle-sparing TRAM, flaps designs have evolved into the current gold standard, the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. From experiences and increasing numbers of flap procedures performed by surgeons, techniques became more familiar and part of standard care. These factors gave rise to the development of a growing number of areas of the body where tissues of interest can be harvested using perforator flap-based techniques. This chapter discusses the most common as well as the ‘rising stars’ in terms of flaps to be used as alternative flaps to the DIEP flap for breast reconstruction. It discusses practical issues on dissection as well as donor site morbidity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document