scholarly journals To analyze and use the parameters in post-operative unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated using dynamic hip screw fixation as guidelines for re-operation

Author(s):  
K. Thirusenthil Aathipan ◽  
T. R. Ashok ◽  
Ganesan G. Ram

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">The treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures is challenging due to the difficulty in obtaining anatomical reduction. The purpose of this study was to analyse and use the parameters (lateral femoral wall integrity and tip-apex distance) in post-operative unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated using dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation as guidelines for re-operation.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This was a prospective study and included 40 patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated using DHS fixation from December 2014 to September 2016. The AO/OTA classification was used to classify each of the patients and their lateral femoral wall integrity and tip-apex distance was assessed in the post-operative radiographs.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> In this study, 3 patients out of 40 (7.5%) had screw pull out within 5 months of surgery. 2 pull outs occurred when the screw was in the antero-superior zone and 1 when it was in the centre to centre zone. Thus, the rate of screw pull out was higher in the antero-superior zone. The 3 patients with screw pull out had a mean tip-apex distance (TAD) of 36.01 mm as compared to 32.96 mm of those who did not have screw pull out. We further found that pre-operatively 6 patients out of 40 (15%) had lost lateral femoral wall integrity whereas post-operatively 26 patients out of 40 (65%) had lost it. In summary, there is a 5 times higher risk of losing lateral femoral wall integrity if DHS is the implant of choice<span lang="EN-IN">. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> On conclusion, unacceptable TAD limit with loss of lateral femoral wall integrity was found to be a definite indicator of DHS implant pull out. And also found that by using the DHS as an implant of choice, there is a 5 times higher risk of losing lateral femoral wall integrity intra-operatively and that its use for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures must be guarded<span lang="EN-IN">.</span></p>

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1.4) ◽  
pp. 364-368
Author(s):  
Dr. Aditya K Agrawal ◽  
Dr. C Sai Sabharish Reddy ◽  
Dr. Manish R Shah ◽  
Dr. Sarvang Desai ◽  
Dr. Paresh Golwala ◽  
...  

Injury ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.Z. Said ◽  
O. Farouk ◽  
A. El-Sayed ◽  
H.G. Said

Author(s):  
Sachin Yadav ◽  
D. C. Srivastava ◽  
Manish Shukla

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The aim of the present study was to compare the result in terms of rate of union, time of ambulation and functional recovery of fracture intertrochanteric femur treated by dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral interlocking nail (PFN) and to compare complications in terms of implant failure, infection, blood loss and C arm exposure in both groups.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This was a prospective study of 92 cases, 38 cases were treated by PFN and 54 cases were treated by DHS. Patients were followed up at 6, 12, 18 and 24 weeks. The results were compared for functional outcome using Palmer and Parker score and also for various complications.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Comparison of mobility score at six month follow up period revealed  the PFN group to be significantly more mobile (5.8 Vs. 4.19 respectively, p &lt;0.001) than the DHS  group. In our study 6 patients managed with DHS (6.52%) developed superficial wound infection which responded to intravenous antibiotics. No patient with PFN had wound infection. Only 2 patients in the PFN group and 12 patients in the DHS group had persistent pain at the incision site.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Dynamic hip screw fixation of these fracture requires less preoperative time,  is associated with less exposure to radiation but the blood loss is much higher. On the contrary PFN allows faster mobilization and greater mobility scores at six months.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document