scholarly journals A study to compare clinical efficacy and safety of two different doses of intranasal midazolam as premedication for paediatric surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-100
Author(s):  
Aditya Sharma ◽  
◽  
Amandeep Singh ◽  
Chashamjot Bawa ◽  
Jyoti Raina ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linli Sun ◽  
Chunxia Wang ◽  
Yulu Zhou ◽  
Wei Sun ◽  
Chunjiang Wang

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different doses of sildenafil for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) with Bayesian random effects network meta-analysis.Methods: We searched Chinese and English databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning sildenafil in newborns with persistent pulmonary hypertension from 1998 to December 2020.Results: Twenty-two RCTs including over 2131 patients were included. Sildenafil was administered by nasal feeding at 0.3–2 mg/kg every 4–6 h. The network meta-analysis revealed that 1.5 mg/kg of sildenafil led to a significant decrease in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) compared with 0.3 and 0.6 mg/kg (p < 0.05); 1.5 mg/kg was better than 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg at increasing the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) (p < 0.05); 1.5 mg/kg was better than 0.5, 0.6 and 1.0 mg/kg at reducing the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) (p < 0.05); and 1.2 mg/kg was better than 0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg at increasing the arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) (p < 0.05). The surface under the cumulative ranking analysis (SUCRA) results showed that 1.5 mg/kg had the best effect in reducing PASP (SUCRA = 92.0%, moderate certainty evidence) and PaCO2 (91.1%) and increasing PaO2 (SUCRA = 79.3%, moderate certainty evidence), 2.0 mg/kg had the best effect in increasing SaO2 (SUCRA = 88.6%, moderate certainty evidence) and total effective rate (SUCRA = 93.5%, low certainty of evidence)). No severe adverse effects were observed with the different doses of sildenafil.Conclusion: Different doses of sildenafil can significantly improve PPHN, and 1.5 mg/kg of sildenafil has better clinical efficacy and does not increase the probability of adverse reactions.


2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Ryeol Cheong ◽  
Hyun Young Woo ◽  
Jeong Heo ◽  
Ki Tae Yoon ◽  
Dong Uk Kim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 427-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Cui ◽  
Siqi Tu ◽  
Valerie Sia Jie En ◽  
Xiaobei Li ◽  
Xueting Yao ◽  
...  

Background: As the number of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) infected people is greatly increasing worldwide, the international medical situation becomes very serious. Potential therapeutic drugs, vaccine and stem cell replacement methods are emerging, so it is urgent to find specific therapeutic drugs and the best treatment regimens. After the publications on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with anti- SARS-COV-2 activity in vitro, a small, non-randomized, open-label clinical trial showed that HCQ treatment was significantly associated with reduced viral load in patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Meanwhile, a large prophylaxis study of HCQ sulfate for COVID-19 has been initiated in the United States. HCQ offered a promising efficacy in the treatment of COVID-19, but the optimal administration is still being explored. Methods: We used the keyword "hydroxychloroquine" to conduct a literature search in PubMed to collect relevant literature on the mechanism of action of HCQ, its clinical efficacy and safety, pharmacokinetic characteristics, precautions for clinical use and drug interactions to extract and organize information. Results: This paper reviews the mechanism, clinical efficacy and safety, pharmacokinetic characteristics, exposureresponse relationship and precautions and drug interactions of HCQ, and summarizes dosage recommendations for HCQ sulfate. Conclusion: It has been proved that HCQ, which has an established safety profile, is effective against SARS-CoV-2 with sufficient pre-clinical rationale and evidence. Data from high-quality clinical trials are urgently needed worldwide.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay M Frerichs ◽  
Deborah I Friedman

Migraine is a common and disabling disorder affecting approximately 1.02 billion people worldwide. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has been identified as playing an important role in the pathophysiology of migraine and several migraine-specific therapies targeting the CGRP ligand or its receptor have been approved since 2018 for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. This review focuses on the pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety/tolerability of galcanezumab, an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody approved for the prevention of migraine.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document