The Economics of Investment in Flood Risk Reduction in Developing Countries: An Application to the Rocha River Basin of Bolivia

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Corderi Novoa ◽  
Hori Tsuneki ◽  
Luis E. Yamin
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorina Schudel ◽  
Yvonne Walz ◽  
Kokouvi Gbétey Akpamou

<p>Floods in West Africa repeatedly cause devastating impacts on human life and livelihoods, infrastructure and the environment and they are expected to increase in frequency and severity under a changing climate. Ecosystem-based approaches can be a cost-effective, efficient way to reduce flood risk while at the same time providing co-benefits. However, qualitative and quantitative assessments of ecosystem-based approaches that are suitable for the climatic conditions and socio-ecological system of the region are scarse. This study therefore identifies and evaluates climate-sensitive ecosystem-based approaches for the transboundary Lower Mono River Basin in Benin and Togo. The identification of ecosystem-based approaches has been done based on a review of scientific literature and complemented by a participatory approach with experts from the catchment. During focus group discussions, national stakeholders and policy makers identified, prioritized and mapped existing measures and provided their perspectives on prospective measures to reduce flood risk in the transboundary catchment. They include measures to reduce flow velocity, increase soil infiltration and improve water management. In a next step, we used a multi-criteria analysis considering ecological, climatic and flood hazard data to create suitability maps for different clusters of identified ecosystem-based approaches. This study is part of the CLIMAFRI project, which aims at creating a river basin information system for the Lower Mono Basin as well as creating a flood risk management plan. Through the integration of the suitability maps into the flood risk assessment tool, which has been created in the scope of this project, the ecosystem-based approaches are evaluated quantitatively. In a second round of focus group discussions with representatives from the local communities, feasibility of selected ecosystem-based approaches, co-benefits and trade-offs of the measures are discussed. Through the combination of qualitative and quantitative data, a holistic evaluation of ecosystem-based approaches and their contribution to hazard mitigation, increase of coping capacity, ecosystem resilience and overall flood risk reduction can be achieved.</p>


Geosciences ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Schmid-Breton ◽  
Gesa Kutschera ◽  
Ton Botterhuis ◽  
The ICPR Expert Group ‘Flood Risk Analysis’ (EG HIRI)

To determine the effects of measures on flood risk, the International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR), supported by the engineering consultant HKV has developed a method and a GIS-tool named “ICPR FloRiAn (Flood Risk Analysis)”, which enables the broad-scale assessment of the effectiveness of flood risk management measures on the Rhine, but could be also applied to other rivers. The tool uses flood hazard maps and associated recurrence periods for an overall damage and risk assessment for four receptors: human health, environment, culture heritage, and economic activity. For each receptor, a method is designed to calculate the impact of flooding and the effect of measures. The tool consists of three interacting modules: damage assessment, risk assessment, and measures. Calculations using this tool show that the flood risk reduction target defined in the Action Plan on Floods of the ICPR in 1998 could be achieved with the measures already taken and those planned until 2030. Upon request, the ICPR will provide this tool and the method to other river basin organizations, national authorities, or scientific institutions. This article presents the method and GIS-tool developed by the ICPR as well as first calculation results.


2019 ◽  
pp. 108602661987543
Author(s):  
Thomas Neise ◽  
Maxensius Tri Sambodo ◽  
Javier Revilla Diez

In developing countries, micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) often cannot substantially reduce their exposure to floods on their own. As state authorities also have difficulty in providing sufficient flood protection, experts argue that collective adaptation initiated by firms can compensate for these shortcomings. However, private sector engagement in this field remains rare and is mostly dominated by large firms. Our article examines whether MSMEs are willing to contribute to flood risk reduction measures. Based on scenario-based field experiments, 120 participating enterprises in Jakarta and Semarang are willing to contribute to collective adaptation in 43% of all the scenarios we ran. Even though MSMEs often operate under difficult conditions, they are surprisingly often willing to contribute if the costs are distributed fairly. The analysis underlines the importance of social motives in explaining the collective engagement of MSMEs and, thus, provides relevant results for future adaptation policies.


Author(s):  
Borja G. Reguero ◽  
Curt D. Storlazzi ◽  
Ann E. Gibbs ◽  
James B. Shope ◽  
Aaron D. Cole ◽  
...  

One Earth ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1310-1321
Author(s):  
David Lallemant ◽  
Perrine Hamel ◽  
Mariano Balbi ◽  
Tian Ning Lim ◽  
Rafael Schmitt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document