scholarly journals Building Effective Partnership Networks when Working Internationally

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey Nelson
2012 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.Y. Leung ◽  
M.E.E. Kretzschmar ◽  
O. Diekmann

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Briscoe ◽  
Katina Pollock ◽  
Carol Campbell ◽  
Shasta Carr-Harris

The use of networks in public education is one of a number of knowledge mobilization (KMb) strategies utilized to promote evidence-based research into practice. However, challenges exist in the ability to effectively mobilizing knowledge through external partnership networks. The purpose of this paper is to further explore how networks work. Data was collected from virtual discussions for an interim report for a province-wide government initiative. A secondary analysis of the data was performed. The findings present network structures and processes that partners were engaged in when building a network within education. The implications of this study show that building a network for successful outcomes is complex and metaphorically similar to finding the “sweet spot.” It is challenging but networks that used strategies to align structures and processes proved to achieve more success in mobilizing research to practice.


2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan R. J. McAllister ◽  
Bruce M. Taylor ◽  
Ben P. Harman

Author(s):  
Andrew Webb ◽  
André Richelieu

The purpose of this research project is to better understand how one global sport for development agency takes advantage of events to build partnerships. This study demonstrates how the current social context, as theorized in Guy Debord’s Society of the Spectacle, facilitates the implementation of what we label as a “seeing-is-believing” strategy. This strategy allows Special Olympics to capitalize on society’s fascination with events to activate partners. Accordingly, a conceptual model that synthesizes and contrasts the aims of commercial spectator sports and sport for development events is provided. This model demonstrates that events are effective partnership-building arenas because, on one hand, they offer opportunities to efficiently evaluate mission attainment. These opportunities exploit our familiarity with events and the unthreatening passivity of watching. On the other hand, events provide pretexts for getting over the initial awkwardness sometimes associated with interacting with athletes identifying with intellectual disabilities. Theoretical and practical implications of the concepts that make the seeing is believing strategy work will also be provided.


2004 ◽  
Vol 149 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-62
Author(s):  
Richard Evans

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document