ARE BANK LOAN OFFICERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE IMPLICATIONS OF LITIGATION-RELATED CLAUSES CONSISTENT WITH REGULATORS AND STANDARD SETTERS?

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 47-55
Author(s):  
Aisha Meeks ◽  
Nicole McCoy ◽  
Dave Thompson
2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
J. David Diltz ◽  
Mark E. Bayless

This paper presents the results of an experimental study in which commercial bank loan officers evaluated a hypothetical ongoing firm for a line of credit, and independently, a term loan. Statistical analysis revealed significant influences on the loan decision resulting from bank size, national charter, urban location, loan officer age, years of experience, and prior experience with capital lease transactions.


2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia L. F. Schleifer ◽  
Randolph A. Shockley

The extensive body of literature and research concerning auditor independence, the so-called cornerstone of the profession, has centered mainly on alleged threats to perceived independence or threats to actual independence. The objective of this study was to investigate accountants and financial statement users reactions to policies designed to enhance auditor independence. Multidimensional scaling techniques were used to measure the similarity or dissimilarity of the views of four separate groups: Big Eight auditors; non-Big Eight CPAs, bank loan officers, and certified financial analysis. Results showed that the four groups differed significantly in the extent of their support of fourteen policies discussed in the Cohen Communication Report as means to enhance auditor independence. The Cohen Commissions position on these policies was found to appear to be more aligned with financial statement users.


2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Wilson ◽  
Sara Carter ◽  
Stephen Tagg ◽  
Eleanor Shaw ◽  
Wing Lam

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document