scholarly journals Apply for the Research Training Institute ‘22

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 153-154
Author(s):  
Editorial Team
Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1679-1679
Author(s):  
Linda J Burns ◽  
Charles P Clayton ◽  
James N. George ◽  
Beverly S. Mitchell ◽  
Scott D. Gitlin

Abstract There is a recognized need to translate scientific discoveries to patient-oriented clinical research (POCR) in order to improve human health. To overcome obstacles that interfere with the recruitment and retention of physicians for POCR careers, in 2003 the American Society of Hematology (ASH) developed the Clinical Research Training Institute (CRTI), an enhanced and extensive mentored experience for early career POCR investigators. The ASH CRTI is limited to 20 trainees/year (senior fellows or junior faculty) with an equivalent number of faculty mentors. The year-long Institute includes a 1 week workshop with didactic sessions on a variety of POCR and career development topics, disease-specific small group sessions focusing on research protocol development with biostatistician participation, and one-on-one interactions with faculty and representatives with expertise in career-development awards from the U.S. National Institutes of Health. Trainees have additional interactions with their small groups and CRTI mentors throughout the ensuing year to promote career development and research collaborations. Communications between the trainees’ CRTI and home institution mentors are a vital component of the program. Evaluation of the POCR career development successes of the first 7 CRTI classes (140 trainees) was performed by reviewing trainees’ curriculum vitaes and their responses to an electronically distributed survey. Gender, racial and ethnic distributions were similar to that of U.S. Hematology/Oncology fellowship programs. The majority (66%) of trainees were senior fellows or graduates of adult hematology/oncology training programs, 31% of pediatric hematology/oncology programs and the remainder of other hematology-related programs. Eighty-six percent of trainees had self-described success establishing a POCR study and 85% considered themselves clinical investigators. Nearly half of trainees had positions that were primarily research focused. CRTI trainees received at least 144 external grant awards plus additional internal awards, and had published 1035 peer-reviewed manuscripts,173 chapters and 115 review articles. Over 95% of trainees were satisfied with their CRTI experience and testimonials supported their impression that CRTI had a significant impact on their career success. Enhancements introduced into the CRTI program, as a result of ongoing program evaluations, include broadening participant eligibility to include up to 5 international trainees per class to enhance global research collaborations and further enhancements to the trainee-mentor interactions. The outcomes of the ASH CRTI support the hypothesis that enhanced mentoring experiences contribute to the successful career development of physicians pursuing POCR careers. Disclosures: Clayton: American Society of Hematology: Employment.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 754-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lillian Sung ◽  
Mark Crowther ◽  
John Byrd ◽  
Scott D. Gitlin ◽  
Joe Basso ◽  
...  

Hypothesis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret A. Hoogland

The Medical Library Association-Research Training Institute (MLA-RTI) is an opportunity for librarians to get hands-on experience and mentoring from faculty experts on how to design, execute, present, and publish the results of a one-year research project.  


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (25) ◽  
pp. 2881-2885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison A. King ◽  
Sara K. Vesely ◽  
Jessica Elwood ◽  
Joe Basso ◽  
Ken Carson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 755-761
Author(s):  
Allison A. King ◽  
Sara K. Vesely ◽  
Emily Vettese ◽  
Sadie Cook ◽  
Adam Cuker ◽  
...  

Abstract We previously identified gender disparities in academic success during evaluation of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) Clinical Research Training Institute (CRTI) and hypothesized that it may be related to caregiving. The objective was to evaluate the impact of gender and caregiving responsibilities on academic success. A cross-sectional survey that included a question about caregiving responsibilities was distributed to alumni who participated in CRTI from 2003 to 2016 and asked about academic productivity in the previous 3 years. Publications and grants were abstracted from submitted curriculum vitae. Academic success was defined as number of first- or senior-author publications, total publications, grants, and percent effort in research. Of 280 potential respondents, 258 responded (92% response rate), 169 (66%) had caregiving responsibilities, and 110 (43%) were men. Respondents with caregiving responsibilities had fewer first- or senior-author publications (median, 3 vs 5; P = .003) and less percent effort in research (median, 40% vs 50%; P = .006). Men had more first- or senior-author publications (median, 4 vs 3; P = .002) and more total publications (median, 12 vs 6.5; P = .0002) than women. When stratified by those without (P = .0001) or with (P = .042) caregiving responsibilities, men had more publications than women. Among men, caregiving responsibilities significantly reduced all outcomes. However, among women, caregiving did not have an impact. In conclusion, men had more publications than women whether or not they had caregiving responsibilities. However, among men, caregiving reduced academic productivity whereas among women, caregiving did not have impact. The scientific community will need to continue to identify the reasons for disparities and implement changes to address them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document