scholarly journals Functional Outcome of Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty For Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture in Elderly Osteoporotic Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr Jagajeev. JR ◽  
Author(s):  
Tushar Chaurasia ◽  
Rajat Charan

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> This study compared functional outcome and results between cemented and uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients older than 60 years with displaced femoral neck fracture.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Total fifty four patients with displaced femoral neck fracture were enrolled in this study. Out of total twenty eight patients underwent uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty and remaining twenty six patients underwent cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Physical examination and radiographs were performed at the first and sixth months after operation and results were recorded. The patient’s pain and functions were evaluated with visual analogue scale and Harris Hip Score<strong> </strong>and then compared to each other.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> All patients were followed up for at least 6 months. Mean operation and bleeding times were longer in cemented group compared to the uncemented group (p&gt;0.05). The mean pain score was significantly less in the cemented group compared to the uncemented group (p=0.001). Hip functional outcome based on HHS was more in the cemented (p=0.001). The intraoperative and postoperative complication rate was higher in the uncemented group (p&lt;0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Although higher rates of intraoperative bleeding and surgery time were seen with cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty in older patients with femoral neck fracture compared to uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty, cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty can cause less complication and improve patient’s function in less time. </p>


Author(s):  
Sawai Singh ◽  
Ram Chander

Background: Intertrochantric fractures are the most frequently operated fractures and has the highest mortality and morbidity rates. Evaluation functional outcome of helical fixation pfn a2 in proximal femur fracture in elderly Methods: Hospital based prospective randomized comparative study conducted on 30 patients with  Close  stable &unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture. Results: As per HHS, we have found that 76.67% cases (23) under excellent category and 20.00% (6) good and 3.33% (1) fair of HHS. Conclusion: We can conclude that the PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL ANTIROTATION2 is after proper training and technique a safe and easy implant option for treatment of complex peritertrochanteric fractures. Keywords: HHS, Femur, fracture


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0003
Author(s):  
Sherly Desnita Savio ◽  
I Made Arya Susila ◽  
Cokorda Gde Oka Dharmayuda

Objectives: Intertrochanteric femur fracture in elderly presents a challenge as the source of morbidity and mortality if not well-treated. This study investigates the functional outcome and revision rate of two of the most common treatments of choice for this condition, Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS), while furthermore investigate the secondary functional outcome of the two procedures if proceeded to Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty (CTHA). Methods: A systematic search was conducted to identify relevant studies through PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane database. A total of 9 studies (2.251 patients) were included, divided into 3 meta-analysis. Random effect model was used for continuous outcomes using Review Manager. Results: For primary Harris Hip Score (HHS), the mean HHS at 12-months follow-up for PFNA (n = 184) was 77.77, as for DHS (n = 187) was 78.33, indicating no significant difference (P = 0.73). The mean revision rates for PFNA (n=784) was 2.68%, as for DHS (n=766) was 2.48%, indicating no significant difference (P = 0.61). For secondary HHS after CTHA, the mean HHS 12-months postoperatively for PFNA (n =142) was 83.97, as for DHS (n = 190) was 83.65, indicating no significant difference (P = 0.59). Discussion: PFNA and DHS can both be considered in osteoporotic intertrochanter femur fracture, as the two procedures offer similar 1-year functional outcome and revision rate. However, PFNA may benefit with less blood loss and operation time. Some potential revision causes, such as peri-implant femoral fracture, infection, and implant failure should always be monitored perioperatively. Furthermore, when CTHA is indicated for revision, the two procedures offer comparable secondary functional outcome. Conclusion: Current meta-analysis suggests that PFNA and DHS both have comparable primary functional outcome, revision rate, and post-CTHA secondary functional outcome.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 350-358
Author(s):  
Dr. Siddharth Bhaginath Jadhav ◽  
Dr. Rahul Ajit Damle ◽  
Dr. Janmajay Dalal ◽  
Dr. Saumitra Dubey ◽  
Dr. Abhijeet Nalkar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document