scholarly journals MiR-513b-5p represses autophagy during the malignant progression of hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting PIK3R3

Aging ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Jin ◽  
Yilei Liang ◽  
Shuyou Li ◽  
Guoxiang Lin ◽  
Haiying Liang ◽  
...  
Tumor Biology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 12225-12233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Hao Wu ◽  
Chang-Chang Jia ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Ze-Xiao Lin ◽  
Dan-Yun Ruan ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 1050-1057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroto Katoh ◽  
Tatsuhiro Shibata ◽  
Akiko Kokubu ◽  
Hidenori Ojima ◽  
Tomoo Kosuge ◽  
...  

Aging ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 11717-11731
Author(s):  
Hanhan Dai ◽  
Minjing Li ◽  
Wei Yang ◽  
Xiucui Sun ◽  
Peiyuan Wang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanfang Qu ◽  
Sanyu Qin ◽  
Xuemei Zhang ◽  
Xiaotong Bo ◽  
Zhengchun Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the world. N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) RNA methylation is dynamically regulated by m 6 A RNA methylation modulators (“writer,” “eraser,” and “reader” proteins), which are associated with cancer occurrence and development. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between m 6 A RNA methylation modulators and HCC. Methods: First, using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) databases, we compared the expression levels of 13 major m6A RNA methylation modulators between HCC and normal tissues. Second, we applied consensus clustering to the expression data on the m 6 A RNA methylation modulators to divide the HCC tissues into two subgroups (clusters 1 and 2), and we compared the clusters in terms of overall survival (OS), World Health Organization (WHO) stage, and pathological grade. Third, using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, we constructed a risk signature involving the m 6 A RNA methylation modulators that affected OS in TCGA and ICGC analyses. Results: We found that the expression levels of 12 major m6A RNA methylation modulators were significantly different between HCC and normal tissues. After dividing the HCC tissues into clusters 1 and 2, we found that cluster 2 had poorer OS, higher WHO stage, and higher pathological grade. Four m 6 A RNA methylation modulators (YTHDF1, YTHDF2, METTL3, and KIAA1429) affecting OS in the TCGA and ICGC analyses were selected to construct a risk signature, which was significantly associated with WHO stage and was also an independent prognostic marker of OS. Conclusions: In summary, m 6 A RNA methylation modulators are key participants in the malignant progression of HCC and have potential value in prognostication and treatment decisions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 5831-5839
Author(s):  
Nan Yang ◽  
Liang Wang ◽  
Tianxiang Chen ◽  
Runkun Liu ◽  
Zhikui Liu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanfang Qu ◽  
Haixing Jiang ◽  
Sanyu Qin ◽  
Xuemei Zhang ◽  
Zhengchun Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the world. N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) RNA methylation is dynamically regulated by m 6 A RNA methylation modulators (“writer,” “eraser,” and “reader” proteins), which are associated with cancer occurrence and development. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between m 6 A RNA methylation modulators and HCC. Methods: First, using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) databases, we compared the expression levels of 13 major m6A RNA methylation modulators between HCC and normal tissues. Second, we applied consensus clustering to the expression data on the m 6 A RNA methylation modulators to divide the HCC tissues into two subgroups (clusters 1 and 2), and we compared the clusters in terms of overall survival (OS), World Health Organization (WHO) stage, and pathological grade. Third, using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, we constructed a risk signature involving the m 6 A RNA methylation modulators that affected OS in TCGA and ICGC analyses. Results: We found that the expression levels of 12 major m6A RNA methylation modulators were significantly different between HCC and normal tissues. After dividing the HCC tissues into clusters 1 and 2, we found that cluster 2 had poorer OS, higher WHO stage, and higher pathological grade. Four m 6 A RNA methylation modulators (YTHDF1, YTHDF2, METTL3, and KIAA1429) affecting OS in the TCGA and ICGC analyses were selected to construct a risk signature, which was significantly associated with WHO stage and was also an independent prognostic marker of OS. Conclusions: In summary, m 6 A RNA methylation modulators are key participants in the malignant progression of HCC and have potential value in prognostication and treatment decisions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document