scholarly journals Business Process Maturity Models Research: A Systematic Literature Review

Author(s):  
T. Bartosz Kalinowski

Business Process Maturity can be defined as the „degree of explicit definition, management, measurement, control and effectiveness” of organisational processes (Humphrey, 1987, p. 1- 13) or their ability to systematically provide better business results (McCormack, Johnson, 2001, p. 12). The practical implementation of the above concept is reflected trough Business Process Maturity Models (BPMMs). They have been designed in order to enable companies to shift their business process management from „as-is” state, where process are undefined and underperforming to a desired „to-be” state, in which processes are being continuously improved. The available literature proofs that many review papers on BPMMs, in particular those issued before 2010 lacks an extensive set of systematic literature review or analysis criteria. For example, the authors didn’t pay attention whether the analysed models focused on a single process, a specific group of processes or all organisational processes. Often, there was also no distinction between organisational and process maturity, which appeared in the analysed models as separate concepts, or different types of maturity (e.g. process, project, supply chain, etc.). Some systematic attempts for analysing BPMMs were undertaken by e.g. A. Van Looy (2010, p. 687-697), M. Rosemann and J. vom Brocke (2010, pp 105-122), as well as M. Röglinger, J. Pöppelbuß and J. Becker (2012, p. 328-346), however still significant limitation of these research can be enumerated. As a result of the identified research gap, this papers aims at performing a systematic literature review based on transparent and sound criteria. The paper is divided into three main parts. The first part (introduction) focuses on presenting briefly the „state-of-the-art” regarding the Business Process Maturity Models research. The second part provides insights into the methodology of performing the systematic literature review. Finally, the last part of the paper discusses the results of the performed study and resulting conclusions.

Author(s):  
Laura Sanchez ◽  
Andrea Delgado ◽  
Francisco Ruiz ◽  
Felix Garcia ◽  
Mario Piattini

The underlying premise of process management is that the quality of products and services is largely determined by the quality of the processes used to develop, deliver and support them. A concept which has been closely related to process quality over the last few years is the maturity of the process and it is important to highlight the current proposal of Business Process Maturity Model (BPMM), which is based on the principles, architecture and practices of CMM and CMMI for Software and describes the essential practices for the development, preparation, deployment, operations and support of product and service offers from determining customer needs. When maturity models are in place, it is important not to forget the important role that measurement can play, being essential in organizations which intend to reach a high level in the maturity in their processes. This is demonstrated by observing the degree of importance that measurement activities have in maturity models. This chapter tackles the Business Process Maturity Model and the role that business measurement plays in the context of this model. In addition, a set of representative business process measures aligned with the characteristics of BPMM are introduced which can guide organizations to support the measurement of their business processes depending on their maturity.


IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 142312-142336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Alberto Garcia-Garcia ◽  
Nicolas Sanchez-Gomez ◽  
David Lizcano ◽  
M. J. Escalona ◽  
Tomas Wojdynski

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 1305-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto De Ramón Fernández ◽  
Daniel Ruiz Fernández ◽  
Yolanda Sabuco García

Business Process Management is a new strategy for process management that is having a major impact today. Mainly, its use is focused on the industrial, services, and business sector. However, in recent years, it has begun to apply for optimizing clinical processes. So far, no studies that evaluate its true impact on the healthcare sector have been found. This systematic review aims to assess the results of the application of Business Process Management methodology on clinical processes, analyzing whether it can become a useful tool to improve the effectiveness and quality of processes. We conducted a systematic literature review using ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Springer databases. After the electronic search process in different databases, 18 articles met the pre-established requirements. The findings support the use of Business Process Management as an effective methodology to optimize clinical processes. Business Process Management has proven to be a feasible and useful methodology to design and optimize clinical processes, as well as to automate tasks. However, a more comprehensive follow-up of this methodology, better technological support, and greater involvement of all the clinical staff are factors that play a key role for the development of its true potential.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 184797901987418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjana Pejić Bach ◽  
Vesna Bosilj Vukšić ◽  
Dalia Suša Vugec ◽  
Ana-Marija Stjepić

Business intelligence (BI) and business process management (BPM) are widely implemented in various organizations. However, their impact on organizational performance strongly depends on their alignment. Previous research has focused mainly on large companies. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) also started to use BI and BPM in order to improve their performance. However, the research regarding this issue is scarce. The goal of the article is to examine the interrelationship of BI and BPM and their impact on organizational performance of SMEs. In order to attain this goal, a systematic literature review and a survey research on the sample of SMEs in Croatia and Slovenia have been conducted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document