scholarly journals How Should One Write about Masters?

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-89
Author(s):  
Adam F. Kola
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Biography ◽  
Narrative Strategies ◽  
Alfred Tarski ◽  
Rhetorical Devices ◽  
Critical Comparison ◽  
1 John ◽  
Roman Jakobson

The aim of the paper is to answer the question: how should one write about masters? It is a question about the narrative strategies of authors writing about masters. The presented analysis is based on five examples: (1) John A. Hall’s Ernest Gellner: An Intellectual Biography, (2) Anita Burdman Feferman and Solomon Feferman’s Alfred Tarski: Life and Logic, (3) Edmund Leach’s Lévi-Strauss, (4) Andrzej Walicki’s Idee i ludzie. Próba autobiografii [Ideas and People. An Attempt at an Autobiography], and (5) Dialogues by Roman Jakobson and Krystyna Pomorska. Each text presents different rhetorical devices, authorial relations to the master, and academic aims. The paper concludes with a critical comparison of the five examples (with the addition of some other minor cases also discussed in the paper).  

The Vicissitudes of Humboldt’s Mountain Moments

Peak Pursuits ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 27-47
Author(s):  
Caroline Schaumann
Keyword(s):  
Extreme Conditions ◽  
Narrative Strategies ◽  
Rhetorical Devices ◽  
Alexander Von Humboldt ◽  
Unresolved Conflict ◽  
Original Narrative ◽  
Pictorial Representations

This chapter argues that Alexander von Humboldt not only merged opposing approaches but also experienced the dissolution of categories when faced with extreme conditions high in the mountains. It examines how Humboldt slowly departed from paradigms, such as the European sublime and scientific enlightenment, and admitted to becoming intoxicated with unknown heights. It also conveys information about Humboldt's journey from different viewpoints and analytical perspectives that sometimes remain in unresolved conflict. The chapter looks into Humboldt's letters, diary, published travel reports, and pictorial representations in order to piece together the evolution of a mountaineering discourse that adopts original narrative strategies and rhetorical devices while underscoring the endeavor's overall ambivalence. It also describes how Humboldt was proud of his altitude achievements but continually questioned the mountaineering quest.

BAI Versus BSI Critical Comparison: When and Why We Use It

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar N. Arbaje ◽  
Kareem C.L. Edwards ◽  
Takanori K. Endo ◽  
Ana M. Pi ◽  
Rafael Martinez
Keyword(s):  
Critical Comparison

A critical comparison of selected implicit measurement methods.

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Znanewitz ◽  
Lisa Braun ◽  
David Hensel ◽  
Claudia Fantapié Altobelli ◽  
Fabian Hattke
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Methods ◽  
Critical Comparison ◽  
Implicit Measurement

Chesterton, Apologetics, and the Art of Positioning

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-51
Author(s):  
David Pickering
Keyword(s):  
Common Ground ◽  
Rhetorical Devices

This article analyses G.K. Chesterton's positioning of himself as an apologist in relation to his audience. It argues that he deployed a set of rhetorical devices that enabled him to create common ground with his readers. He used these devices to present himself as a friend, and to claim that he presented religious questions to his readers in the manner of an unbiased explorer, in spite of his own faith commitments. As part of this strategy, he restricted the range of theology he used in his apologetics so as to remain as far as possible within boundaries his non-religious readers could easily relate to. The article concludes with reflections concerning Chesterton's influence on some of the Inklings and his relevance for contemporary apologetics.

Géographie et cartographie fictionnelles dans l’Utopie (1516) de Thomas More

Moreana ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (Number 181- (3-4) ◽  
pp. 9-68
Author(s):  
Jean Du Verger
Keyword(s):  
Complex Network ◽  
Narrative Strategies ◽  
Thomas More ◽  
The Third ◽  
Editio Princeps ◽  
Shed Light ◽  
The Way

The philosophical and political aspects of Utopia have often shadowed the geographical and cartographical dimension of More’s work. Thus, I will try to shed light on this aspect of the book in order to lay emphasis on the links fostered between knowledge and space during the Renaissance. I shall try to show how More’s opusculum aureum, which is fraught with cartographical references, reifies what Germain Marc’hadour terms a “fictional archipelago” (“The Catalan World Atlas” (c. 1375) by Abraham Cresques ; Zuane Pizzigano’s portolano chart (1423); Martin Benhaim’s globe (1492); Martin Waldseemüller’s Cosmographiae Introductio (1507); Claudius Ptolemy’s Geographia (1513) ; Benedetto Bordone’s Isolario (1528) ; Diogo Ribeiro’s world map (1529) ; the Grand Insulaire et Pilotage (c.1586) by André Thevet). I will, therefore, uncover the narrative strategies used by Thomas More in a text which lies on a complex network of geographical and cartographical references. Finally, I will examine the way in which the frontispiece of the editio princeps of 1516, as well as the frontispiece of the third edition published by Froben at Basle in 1518, clearly highlight the geographical and cartographical aspect of More’s narrative.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document