scholarly journals Analysis of the First South Korean Focus Countries of Official Development Assistance : Focusing on Foreign Direct Investment

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 287-306
Author(s):  
Kim, Youngwan
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Development Assistance ◽  
Official Development Assistance ◽  
South Korean

scholarly journals Impact of foreign direct investment, remittances and official development assistance on economic growth: panel data approach

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amna Zardoub ◽  
Faouzi Sboui
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Developing Countries ◽  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Panel Data ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Development Assistance ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Official Development Assistance ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Content Type

PurposeGlobalization occupies a central research activity and remains an increasingly controversial phenomenon in economics. This phenomenon corresponds to a subject that can be criticized through its impact on national economies. On the other hand, the world economy is evolving in a liberalized environment in which foreign direct investment plays a fundamental role in the economic development of each country. The advent of financial flows – FDI, remittances and official development assistance – can be a key factor in the development of the economy. The subject of this article is to analyses the effect of financial flows on economic growth in developing countries. Empirically, different approaches have been employed. As part of this work, an attempt was made to use a panel data approach. The results indicate ambiguous effects and confirm the results of previous work.Design/methodology/approachThe authors seek to study the effect of foreign direct investment, remittances and official development assistance (ODA) and some control variables i.e. domestic credit, life expectancy, gross fixed capital formation (GFCF), inflation and three institutional factors on economic growth in developing countries by adopting the panel data methodology. Then, the authors will discuss empirical tests to assess the econometric relevance of the model specification before presenting the analysis of the results and their interpretations that lead to economic policy implications. As part of this work, the authors have rolled panel data for developing countries at an annual frequency during the period from 1990 to 2016. In a first stage of empirical analysis, the authors will carry out a technical study of the heterogeneity test of the individual fixed effects of the countries. This kind of analysis makes it possible to identify the problems retained in the specific choice of econometric modeling to be undertaken in the specificities of the panel data.FindingsThe empirical results validate the hypotheses put forward and indicate the evidence of an ambiguous effect of financial flows on economic growth. The empirical findings from this analysis suggest the use of economic-type solutions to resolve some of the shortcomings encountered in terms of unexpected effects. Governments in these countries should improve the business environment by establishing a framework that further encourages domestic and foreign investment.Originality/valueIn this article, the authors adopt the panel data to study the links between financial flows and economic growth. The authors considered four groups of countries by income.

scholarly journals DO FOREIGN FINANCIAL INFLOWS IMPACT ON ECONOMIC GROWTH? EVIDENCE FROM SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Kwabena Twerefou ◽  
Festus Ebo Turkson ◽  
Belinda Frimpong-Wiafe ◽  
Samuel Antwi Darkwah
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Trade Openness ◽  
Development Assistance ◽  
Government Expenditure ◽  
Official Development Assistance ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Domestic Investment ◽  
Sub Saharan

The study examines the impact of financial inflows, proxied by Foreign Direct Investment, Official Development Assistance and remittances on Economics growth in Sub-Saharan Africa using the Generalized Method of Moments technique and panel data for 47 Sub Saharan African countries for the period 1995-2017, while controlling for domestic investment, human capital, government expenditure, trade openness, inflation, financial development, political rights and civil liberty. The results indicate that remittances and Foreign Direct Investment are growth-enhancing as they impact positively on economic growth consistent with Solow neoclassical model. However, Official Development Assistance reduces economic growth possibly as a result of weak institutional quality. While government expenditure, domestic investment and inflation positively impact on Economics growth, trade openness and Secondary School Enrolment had a negative impact on growth. We recommend countries in the sub-region to come up with policies that encourage Foreign Direct Investment and remittances inflow while ensuring that institutional structures are improved to ensure the efficiency of Official Development Assistance and the better allocation of such resources. Countries also need to focus more on internal sources of finance for government expenditure.

Financing sources and social development: an empirical analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 640-657
Author(s):  
María Vidales ◽  
Carmelo García-Pérez
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Development Assistance ◽  
Econometric Models ◽  
Official Development Assistance ◽  
Inclusive Development ◽  
Joint Analysis ◽  
Positive Contribution ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Explanatory Variables

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse, from an empirical point of view, the importance of each of the main sources of funding in developing countries (foreign direct investment, official development assistance, external debt and remittances) in achieving sustainable, social and inclusive development.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology followed to achieve this purpose is the construction of three econometric models. The general model incorporates as a dependent variable the Human Development Index (HDI) and, as explanatory variables, the four sources of funding indicated above, as well as three exogenous variables (human capital, corruption and natural resources). This model is complemented by two extensions that aim to analyse the behaviour of explanatory variables in reducing inequalities and improving each of the HDI components.FindingsThe results of the estimations of the econometric models show that foreign direct investment and remittances are the sources of funding with the greatest impact on achieving development. Moreover, official development assistance while not making a positive contribution to the achievement of development as a whole, could be adequate to reduce inequalities.Originality/valueThe added value of this paper consists in carrying out a joint analysis of these four sources of funding because previous researches focussed the attention on some of them, drawing partial conclusions. The conclusion of this study is that the four sources of funding analysed can be considered complementary to promote sustainable and inclusive development, although foreign direct investment has a much more important role.

scholarly journals Upshot of Foreign Capital Flows on Real Sector Growth in Nigeria

2020 ◽  
pp. 224-233
Author(s):  
Cyprian Clement Abur
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Foreign Capital ◽  
Development Assistance ◽  
Industrial Sector ◽  
Official Development Assistance ◽  
Real Sector ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Foreign Capital Inflows

This study examines the upshot of foreign capital inflows on real sector growth in Nigeria from 1986 to 2019. The study sets out to achieve the effect of foreign direct investment (FDI), foreign portfolio investment (FPI), and official development assistance (ODA) on real sector growth in Nigeria. The study employed the SVAR model to achieve the study objective and the data sets used for this study were secondary sources. The study found that the inflows of FDI and ODA influence the industrial sector output significantly than the agricultural sector, thereby making the sector unattractive to foreign investors. The study concludes that inflows of foreign direct investment and official development assistance exert influence on industrial sector output than the agricultural sector. The study recommends that policymakers must develop policies that are foreign agricultural capital friendly to attract more foreign capital to the agricultural sector for the growth of economic activities in the industry.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document