scholarly journals Relationship between leaf physiologic traits and canopy color indices during the leaf expansion period in an oak forest

Ecosphere ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. art259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhunqiao Liu ◽  
Haibo Hu ◽  
Hua Yu ◽  
Xi Yang ◽  
Hualei Yang ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 1404-1412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shichao Liu ◽  
Siming Wang ◽  
Meichen Liu ◽  
Fei Yang ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 6396-6404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shichao Liu ◽  
Meichen Liu ◽  
Siming Wang ◽  
Yanling Lin ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
...  

Trees ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 851-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina Koyama ◽  
Naoko Tokuchi ◽  
Keitaro Fukushima ◽  
Masakazu Terai ◽  
Yasuhiro Yamamoto

1986 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 321 ◽  
Author(s):  
HM Rawson ◽  
RL Dunstone

In attempts to determine simple relationships describing the responses of leaf expansion to temperature and radiation, sunflower plants were grown in glasshouses under five temperature and two natural radiation regimes. Crops were also grown in the field at three radiation levels. All leaves, regardless of their position on the plant, fitted a single relationship of relative leaf expansion rate versus leaf age for each regime. These relationships showed that, whilst increased temperature increased the rate of expansion of a leaf at day 1 on our growth scale (approximately unfolding), and reduced the period for which the leaf expanded, each leaf expanded for the same period in day-degree terms regardless of its temperature regime. However this expansion period was modified by radiation such that, for each 1 MJ m-2 day-1 increase, the day-degree sum was reduced by approximately 5°C. The strict inverse relationship between the initial rate of expansion and the expansion period, expressed in days, suggests that at least in some cases the final area of a leaf is largely determined by the stage of 'unfolding'.


EDIS ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Davie Mayeso Kadyampakeni ◽  
Kelly T. Morgan ◽  
Mongi Zekri ◽  
Rhuanito Ferrarezi ◽  
Arnold Schumann ◽  
...  

Water is a limiting factor in Florida citrus production during the majority of the year because of the low water holding capacity of sandy soils resulting from low clay and the non-uniform distribution of the rainfall. In Florida, the major portion of rainfall comes in June through September. However, rainfall is scarce during the dry period from February through May, which coincides with the critical stages of bloom, leaf expansion, fruit set, and fruit enlargement. Irrigation is practiced to provide water when rainfall is not sufficient or timely to meet water needs. Proper irrigation scheduling is the application of water to crops only when needed and only in the amounts needed; that is, determining when to irrigate and how much water to apply. With proper irrigation scheduling, yield will not be limited by water stress. With citrus greening (HLB), irrigation scheduling is becoming more important and critical and growers cannot afford water stress or water excess. Any degree of water stress or imbalance can produce a deleterious change in physiological activity of growth and production of citrus trees.  The number of fruit, fruit size, and tree canopy are reduced and premature fruit drop is increased with water stress.  Extension growth in shoots and roots and leaf expansion are all negatively impacted by water stress. Other benefits of proper irrigation scheduling include reduced loss of nutrients from leaching as a result of excess water applications and reduced pollution of groundwater or surface waters from the leaching of nutrients. Recent studies have shown that for HLB-affected trees, irrigation frequency should increase and irrigation amounts should decrease to minimize water stress from drought stress or water excess, while ensuring optimal water availability in the rootzone at all times.


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc D. Abrams ◽  
Sarah E. Johnson
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document