scholarly journals Immediate Dentin Bond Strength of Self-etch Dentine Adhesives

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
David Lafuente ◽  
Isabel Ferreto
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
The Other ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Dentin Bonding ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Sixth Generation ◽  
Self Etch

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the immediate bond strength of two sixth generation and two seventh generation dentin bonding agents to superficial dentin. Specimens were prepared to exposed superficial dentin and either Clearfil SE, Clearfil S3, Adper Prompt-l-pop of G-bond was applied over the dentin surface and light cured. Then composite resin was applied to the treated surface and light-cured in two increments. Specimens were tested 15 minutes after they were made for shear bond strength at 0.01 cm/min. Clearfil SE had statistically higher bond strength than the other three adhesives evaluated (42.9 MPa). There was no statistical difference among Clearfil S3, Adper Prompt-l-pop and G-Bond. The dentin adhesive with an application of an acidic primer before the application of the adhesive showed better immediate bond strength.

scholarly journals Cavity Preparation by Laser in Primary Teeth: Effect of 2 Levels of Energy Output on the Shear Bond Strength of Composite Restoration to Dentin

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehrsa Paryab ◽  
Shahrzad Sharifi ◽  
Mohammad Javad Kharazifard ◽  
Nazanin Kumarci
Keyword(s):  
Energy Level ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Energy Output ◽  
Primary Tooth ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Tooth Dentin ◽  
Self Etch

Introduction: One of the main applications of laser in dentistry is the removal of dental caries and preparation of restorative cavities. The morphology and wettability of laser prepared surfaces are different from that of those prepared with conventional method which may affect the quality of the adhesive potential of bonding agents in these surfaces. This study aimed to assess the shear bond strength of a total-etch and self-etch adhesive system to primary tooth dentin prepared by two different energy densities of Er:YAG laser in comparison with surfaces prepared by bur. Methods: A total of 60 human primary second molars extracted for orthodontic purposes were selected and randomly divided into 3 main groups of equal (n=20). Group A: Preparation of dentin surface by bur; group B: Preparation of dentin surface by laser with 300 mJ energy level; group C: Preparation of dentin surface by laser with 400 mJ energy level. In each of the main groups, the teeth were randomly assigned to 2 subgroups. Composite resin material was bonded with the total-etch adhesive system in subgroups A1, B1, and C1 and with the self-etch adhesive system in subgroups A2, B2, and C2. The samples were thermo-cycled, and composite restorations shear bond strength was measured in MPa. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The highest and the lowest shear bond strength values were observed in group A2 (Preparation by bur- Composite resin material bonded by Clearfil SE Bond) and group C2 (Preparation by laser with 400 mJ energy level - Composite resin material bonded by Clearfil SE Bond), respectively. The results showed no statistically significant differences between the study subgroups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: It is concluded that in terms of shear bond strength to dentin, Single Bond and Clearfil SE Bond adhesive agents adequately perform in primary tooth dentin prepared by Er: YAG laser with energy levels of 300 and 400 mJ and frequency of 10 Hz.

scholarly journals Effect of Salivary Contamination on the Bond Strength of Total-etch and Self-etch Adhesive Systems: An in vitro Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 655-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
LM Ranganath ◽  
AG Rajesh ◽  
Robert M Justin ◽  
Hemalatha Paranthaman ◽  
Ranjith P Varghese
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Dentin Bonding ◽  
Etched Surface ◽  
Self Etch

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate the influence of salivary contamination during dentin bonding procedures on shear bond strength and to investigate the effect of contaminant-removing treatments on the recovery of bond strength for two dentin-bonding agents. Materials and methods Seventy-seven human maxillary and mandibular molars were randomly divided into two groups for total-etch adhesive (Single bond-3M ESPE, USA) and self-etch primer (UniFil Bond-GC, Tokyo, Japan) and subjected to contamination with saliva. The data for each group were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Student Newman-Keuls test to make comparisons among the groups (p < 0.05). Results Salivary contamination had less adverse effect on the shear bond strength of single bond total-etch adhesive when it was blot dried or washed. UniFil bond was tolerant of salivary contamination, except when contamination occurred after application of the primer. Conclusion In single bond adhesive, when the etched surface is contaminated by saliva, blotting the surface and applying the primer can recover the bond strength. Complete drying of the salivary contaminated surface should be avoided. In the UniFil bond groups, the repriming treatment (UF-V and UF-VI) resulted in the recovery of shear bond strength in the specimens contaminated after priming. Clinical significance The results of this study showed that total- etch adhesive (single bond) was not affected by salivary contamination on the etched surface when the bonding surface was kept moist. Self-etch adhesive (UniFil bond) also tolerated salivary contamination except when the contamination occurred after application of the primer. How to cite this article Justin RM, Paranthaman H, Rajesh AG, Varghese RP, Ranganath LM. Effect of Salivary Contamination on the Bond Strength of Total-etch and Selfetch Adhesive Systems: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(5):655-660.

scholarly journals Adhesion to Primary and Permanent Dentin and a Simple Model Approach

2009 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 32-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deniz C. Can-Karabulut ◽  
Firdevs Tulga Oz ◽  
Baris Karabulut ◽  
Inci Batmaz ◽  
Ozlem Ilk
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Statistical Model ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Dentin Bonding ◽  
Dentin Bonding Agents ◽  
Self Etch

ABSTRACTObjectives: First to compare different dentin bonding agents’ shear bond strength to primary and permanent dentin. Secondly to compare the fracture failure modes and making an attempt to develop a statistical model that could be helpful in predicting them.Methods: Extracted human primary and permanent molars were used as substrates (dentin). The shear bond strength of composite to substrate was measured and fracture surfaces were evaluated visually and with stereomicroscope. Using the data obtained, a statistical model was built in order to predict the failure modes.Results: Higher bond strength values were obtained for permanent dentin. Total-etch adhesives displayed higher shear bond strength values than the self-etch adhesive. Adhesive failures were more frequently seen in primary dentin. Self-etch adhesive system displayed more adhesive failures. Prepared model confirmed the negative relationship between shear bond strength and the probability of observing adhesive failure.Conclusions: There should be an application protocol for the usage of dentin bonding agents in primary dentin. Further development of statistical and fuzzy models for failure modes can be supportive alternatives for microscopic evaluations and also be helpful in understanding and eliminating the factors which are responsible for the formation of adhesive failures and for achieving clinically more successful adhesive restorations. (Eur J Dent 2009;3:32-41)

scholarly journals Influence of Immediate Dentin Sealing on the Shear Bond Strength of Pressed Ceramic Luted to Dentin with Self-Etch Resin Cement

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Dalby ◽  
Ayman Ellakwa ◽  
Brian Millar ◽  
F. Elizabeth Martin
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Ceramic ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Bonding Agent ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Dentin Bonding ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Dentin Bonding Agents ◽  
Group A ◽  
Dentin Bonding Agent

Objectives. To examine the effect of immediate dentin sealing (IDS), with dentin bonding agents (DBAs) applied to freshly cut dentin, on the shear bond strength of etched pressed ceramic luted to dentin with RelyX Unicem (RXU) cement.Method. Eighty extracted noncarious third molars were ground flat to expose the occlusal dentin surfaces. The teeth were randomly allocated to five groups (A to E) of sixteen teeth each. Groups A to D were allocated a dentin bonding agent (Optibond FL, One Coat Bond, Single Bond, or Go!) that was applied to the dentin surface to mimic the clinical procedure of IDS. These specimen groups then had etched glass ceramic discs (Authentic) luted to the sealed dentin surface using RXU. Group E (control) had etched glass ceramic discs luted to the dentin surface (without a dentin bonding agent) using RXU following the manufacturer’s instructions. All specimens were stored for one week in distilled water at room temperature and then shear stressed at a constant cross-head speed of 1 mm per minute until failure. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey HSD method () applied for multiple paired comparisons.Results. The shear bond strength results for group A to E ranged from to  MPa. One-way ANOVA demonstrated a difference () between the groups tested and the Tukey HSD demonstrated a significant () difference between the shear bond strength (SBS) of Optibond FL (Group A) and Go! (Group D). There was no statistical difference () in the SBS between the test groups (A–D) or the control (group E).Conclusion. IDS using the dentin bonding agents tested does not statistically () affect the shear bond strength of etched pressed ceramic luted to dentin with RXU when compared to the control.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF THREE SELF-ETCH DENTIN BONDING AGENTS TO DENTIN: AN IN-VITRO STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 454-459
Author(s):  
Bhalla V. ◽  
◽  
K. Goud M. ◽  
Chockattu S. ◽  
Khera A ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Mandibular Molar ◽  
Self Etch

Background:Dentin bonding is an ever-evolving field in adhesive dentistry. With the introduction of newer systems into the market, there is a crucial need to test their efficiency in terms of bond strength. Dual-cured adhesives in theory may provide for a better degree of conversion as compared to conventional light-cured adhesives .Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of three different self-etch adhesives namely ClearfilSE bond (Kuraray), Tetric N Bond Universal (IvoclarVivadent) and Futura Bond DC (Voco) to dentin. Materials & Methods: Ninety extracted non-carious, intact human mandibular molar teeth were selected for this study. Each tooth was decoronated using a double-sided diamond disc with water coolant to a depth of 2mm from the cusp tip .The cut dentin surface was then abraded against 600-grit wet silicon carbide papers for 60 seconds to produce a uniform smear layer. The root portion of each tooth was mounted on a plastic ring using cold cure acrylic resin. Specimens were then divided into three adhesive groups of 30 teeth each, Group A: ClearfilSE Bond (Kuraray), Group B: Tetric N Bond Universal (IvoclarVivadent), Group C :Futura Bond DC (Voco). All bonding agents were used according to the manufacturers’ instructions, in combination with the resin composite Tetric N Ceram (IvoclarVivadent). The samples were thermocycled, followed by shear bond strength testing using a Universal testing machine (Hounsfield). Data were subjected to statistical analysis using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (P<0.05) and Post hoc Tukey’s test for inter- and intra- group analysis respectively. Results: Clearfil SE Bond yielded the highest shear bond strength values (30.9 ±4.66 MPa) which were statistically significant, followed byTetric N Bond Universal group (29.8 ±4.34) and the lowest shear bond strength values were recorded for Futura Bond DC (18.2 ±3.13). Conclusion: Clearfil SE bond and Tetric N bond Universal can be considered as better options than Futura Bond DC.

The effects of three different desensitizing agents on the shear bond strength of composite resin bonding agents

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 399-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yahya Orcun Zorba ◽  
Ali Erdemir ◽  
Ertugrul Ercan ◽  
Ayce Unverdi Eldeniz ◽  
Baris Kalaycioǧlu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Desensitizing Agents ◽  
Resin Bonding
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document