L’efficacia nella pratica clinica del distal-jet ad ancoraggio scheletrico

Dental Cadmos ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (02) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Federica Altieri ◽  
Rosanna Guarnieri ◽  
Ersilia Barbato ◽  
Michele Cassetta
Keyword(s):  
2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giordani Santos Silveira ◽  
Luiz Fernando Eto
Keyword(s):  

Freqüentemente, o tratamento da má oclusão de Classe II requer a distalização de molares superiores. O aparelho extrabucal foi o primeiro sistema criado para este fim, e ao longo de mais de um século de uso, provou sua eficiência. Entretanto, apresenta como grande desvantagem, o impacto estético negativo, já que os seus resultados estão atrelados à sistemática colaboração dos pacientes. Assim, vários aparelhos distalizadores intra-bucais foram desenvolvidos na expectativa de eliminar a necessidade de colaboração do paciente, dentre eles, se destaca o Distal Jet. Segundo Carano e Testa (1996), ele é o único mecanismo intrabucal capaz de distalizar os molares de corpo. Para avaliar os efeitos deste aparelho, um estudo piloto foi desenvolvido, utilizando-se seis adolescentes (idade média: 13,08 anos), portadores de má oclusão de Classe II dentária e padrão facial semelhante entre si. Telerradiografias laterais pré- e pós-distalização foram realizadas. O tempo médio desta fase foi de 4,5 meses. Mudanças de tecidos moles, esqueléticas e dentárias foram determinadas, comparando-se as medidas dos cefalogramas iniciais e finais. Utilizando-se o teste de Wilcoxon, as variáveis que apresentaram diferença significativa foram: inclinação distal da coroa do segundo molar, distalização do primeiro molar e distalização do segundo molar. O Distal Jet mostrou ser eficiente na distalização dos molares superiores, sobretudo pelo pequeno componente de inclinação dos primeiros molares. A perda de ancoragem e o aumento da altura facial ântero-inferior não apresentaram significância estatística.


2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-370
Author(s):  
Sorileé Carlina Ramon Pujols ◽  
Cinthya Quagliato Nogueira ◽  
Rachelle Simões Reis ◽  
Camilla Fiedler Fonçatti ◽  
José Fernando Castanha Henriques ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena VILANOVA ◽  
José Fernando Castanha HENRIQUES ◽  
Mayara Paim PATEL ◽  
Rachelle Simões REIS ◽  
Roberto Henrique da Costa GREC ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (6) ◽  
pp. 13A-14A ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldo Carano ◽  
Mauro Testa
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Cozzani ◽  
Marco Pasini ◽  
Francesco Zallio ◽  
Robert Ritucci ◽  
Sabrina Mutinelli ◽  
...  

Aim. To investigate and compare the efficiency of two appliances for molar distalization: the bone-anchored distal screw (DS) and the traditional tooth-supported distal jet (DJ) for molar distalization and anchorage loss.Methods.Tests (18 subjects) were treated with a DS and controls (18 subjects) were treated with a DJ. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before and at the end of molar distalization and were analysed. Shapiro Wilk test, unpairedt-test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were applied according to values distribution. Theαlevel was fixed at 0.05.Results. Maxillary first molars were successfully distalized into a Class I relationship in all patients. The mean molar distalization and treatment time were similar in both groups. The DS group exhibited a spontaneous distalization (2.1±0.9 mm) of the first premolar with control of anchorage loss, distal tipping, extrusion, and skeletal changes.Conclusions. The DS is an adequate compliance-free distalizing appliance that can be used safely for the correction of Class II malocclusions. In comparison to the traditional DJ, the DS enables not only a good rate of molar distalization, but also a spontaneous distalization of the first premolars.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 56-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachelle Simões Reis ◽  
José F. C. Henriques ◽  
Guilherme Janson ◽  
Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas ◽  
Wilana Moura

ABSTRACT Objective: This study evaluated the dental, skeletal and soft tissue effects in Class II malocclusion patients treated with Distal Jet appliance, compared to an untreated control group. Methods: 44 patients with Class II malocclusion were divided into two groups: Group 1 (experimental) - 22 patients, mean age of 12.7 years, treated with the Distal Jet appliance for a mean period of 1.2 years; Group 2 (control) - 22 untreated patients, mean age of 12.2 years, followed by a mean period of 1.2 years. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before treatment (T0) and at the end of the distalization (T1).Independent t test was used to identify intergroup differences. Results: When compared to control group, the Distal Jet produced a significant increase in mandibular plane angle (0.7 ± 2.0o). The maxillary second molars presented distal inclination (6.6 ± 3.8o), distalization (1.1 ± 1.1 mm) and extrusion (1.3 ± 2.1 mm). The maxillary first molars distalized by 1.2 ± 1.4 mm. The maxillary first premolars mesialized by 3.4 ± 1.1 mm. The maxillary incisors showed slight labial tipping of 4.3 ± 4.7o and were protruded by 2.4 ± 1.7 mm. There were no significant changes in the facial profile. The overjet increased 1.5 ± 1.1 mm and overbite had no significant changes. Conclusion: The Distal Jet appliance is effective to distalize the maxillary first molars, but promotes increase in mandibular plane angle, distal inclination, extrusion and distalization of maxillary second molars, mesialization of maxillary first premolars, proclination and protrusion of maxillary incisors, and increase in overjet, when compared to a control group.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vonny Ngantung ◽  
Ram S. Nanda ◽  
S.Jay Bowman
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Mukesh Kumar ◽  
Manish Goyal ◽  
Amandeep Kaur ◽  
Ekta Yadav
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document