distal jet
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

33
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Mukesh Kumar ◽  
Manish Goyal ◽  
Amandeep Kaur ◽  
Ekta Yadav
Keyword(s):  

Dental Cadmos ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (02) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Federica Altieri ◽  
Rosanna Guarnieri ◽  
Ersilia Barbato ◽  
Michele Cassetta
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. e455-e462
Author(s):  
S. Bellini-Pereira ◽  
A. Aliaga-Del Castillo ◽  
L. Vilanova ◽  
M. Patel ◽  
R. Reis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-370
Author(s):  
Sorileé Carlina Ramon Pujols ◽  
Cinthya Quagliato Nogueira ◽  
Rachelle Simões Reis ◽  
Camilla Fiedler Fonçatti ◽  
José Fernando Castanha Henriques ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena VILANOVA ◽  
José Fernando Castanha HENRIQUES ◽  
Mayara Paim PATEL ◽  
Rachelle Simões REIS ◽  
Roberto Henrique da Costa GREC ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 56-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachelle Simões Reis ◽  
José F. C. Henriques ◽  
Guilherme Janson ◽  
Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas ◽  
Wilana Moura

ABSTRACT Objective: This study evaluated the dental, skeletal and soft tissue effects in Class II malocclusion patients treated with Distal Jet appliance, compared to an untreated control group. Methods: 44 patients with Class II malocclusion were divided into two groups: Group 1 (experimental) - 22 patients, mean age of 12.7 years, treated with the Distal Jet appliance for a mean period of 1.2 years; Group 2 (control) - 22 untreated patients, mean age of 12.2 years, followed by a mean period of 1.2 years. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before treatment (T0) and at the end of the distalization (T1).Independent t test was used to identify intergroup differences. Results: When compared to control group, the Distal Jet produced a significant increase in mandibular plane angle (0.7 ± 2.0o). The maxillary second molars presented distal inclination (6.6 ± 3.8o), distalization (1.1 ± 1.1 mm) and extrusion (1.3 ± 2.1 mm). The maxillary first molars distalized by 1.2 ± 1.4 mm. The maxillary first premolars mesialized by 3.4 ± 1.1 mm. The maxillary incisors showed slight labial tipping of 4.3 ± 4.7o and were protruded by 2.4 ± 1.7 mm. There were no significant changes in the facial profile. The overjet increased 1.5 ± 1.1 mm and overbite had no significant changes. Conclusion: The Distal Jet appliance is effective to distalize the maxillary first molars, but promotes increase in mandibular plane angle, distal inclination, extrusion and distalization of maxillary second molars, mesialization of maxillary first premolars, proclination and protrusion of maxillary incisors, and increase in overjet, when compared to a control group.


Prosthesis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Portelli ◽  
Militi ◽  
Logiudice ◽  
Nucera

Background: Among tooth anomalies, missing teeth is one of the most frequent, and it can be related to different therapeutical sets of problems. Often, an integrated approach that interests both orthodontists and prosthodontists is necessary, and in some cases also the periodontists. Methods: In this paper the authors report a clinical case of a 14-year-old patient, affected by maxillary bilateral incisors agenesis, molar bilateral II class and deep bite, treated in the Department of Orthodontics and Pedodontics of the University of Messina. The orthodontic treatment target was the distal movement of the maxillary molar, and the recovery of the space necessary for the prosthetic restoration of the missing lateral incisor. Maxillary molars distal movement was performed with a Distal Jet apparatus, skeletally supported by two miniscrews (Distal-Screw, American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI, USA). After molar relationship correction, a multi-bracket bimaxillary orthodontic appliance was bonded using Empower Brackets (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI, USA). At the end of orthodontic treatment a Maryland bridge, bonded on the central incisors and cuspids, was used in order to maintain the space necessary for the insertion of dental implants in the region of 1.2 and 2.2 Results: A class II molar relationship was corrected, with an improvement of the deep bite, and the space necessary for implant insertion was recovered Conclusion: A skeletally supported Distal Jet was efficient for molar distalization, with the advantage of not having any loss of anchorage in the anterior part of the dental arch. This apparatus does not need patient compliance, have favorable aesthetics and also give the possibility to perform asymmetric activations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document