scholarly journals Using Pathway Modeling to Evaluation and Improve Student-Centered Teaching Practices in Co-Taught College Science Courses

Author(s):  
Xinnian Chen ◽  
John Redden ◽  
Aiyana Bobrownicki ◽  
Julia Gill ◽  
Mark Graham

Student-centered teaching practices such as active learning continue to gain momentum in college science education. Many instructors committed to these innovative practices transform their classroom beyond the standard lecture. Nevertheless, widespread implementation of these practices is limited because the learning benefits for students are often attained through increased instructional complexity to which many instructors cannot commit. When co-instructors are teaching the course, the level of commitment to building a student-centered classroom may be even more profound. For these reasons, new tools are needed to help instructors and co-instructors plan, organize, evaluate, and communicate their classroom innovations. Pathway modeling is a tool with potential to fill this gap. Unlike curriculum mapping -- which identifies academic content gaps, redundancies, and misalignments by examining a series of courses within a plan of study – course pathway modeling creates a visual map of a single course and reveals how teaching practices influence short-, mid-, and long-term student learning outcomes. This essay demonstrates how course pathway modeling can help co-instructors better represent the complexity of student-centered teaching practices. We include guides for creating course pathway models and discuss how this approach offers the potential to improve curricular design, course evaluation, student assessment, and communication between co-instructors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. es5
Author(s):  
Xinnian Chen ◽  
John M. Redden ◽  
Aiyana Bobrownicki ◽  
Julia Gill ◽  
Mark J. Graham

This Essay demonstrates how course pathway modeling can help co-instructors better represent the complexity of student-centered teaching practices. It discusses how this approach can improve curricular design, course evaluation, student assessment, and communication between co-instructors.


2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (12) ◽  
pp. 3085-3090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melinda T. Owens ◽  
Shannon B. Seidel ◽  
Mike Wong ◽  
Travis E. Bejines ◽  
Susanne Lietz ◽  
...  

1936 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred G. Anibal ◽  
Philip A. Leighton

Author(s):  
Fionnuala Farrell ◽  
Michael Carr

Abstract Over the last number of years we have gradually been introducing a project based learning approach to the teaching of engineering mathematics in Dublin Institute of Technology. Several projects are now in existence for the teaching of both second-order differential equations and first order differential equations. We intend to incrementally extend this approach across more of the engineering mathematics curriculum. As part of this ongoing process, practical real-world projects in statistics were incorporated into a second year ordinary degree mathematics module. This paper provides an overview of these projects and their implementation. As a means to measure the success of this initiative, we used the SALG instrument to gain feedback from the students. The SALG online tool - Student Assessment of their Learning Gains - https://salgsite.net/; is a free course-evaluation tool that enables third-level educators to gather feedback specifically focused on what the students gained through the learning exercise they experience. It can be used to measure students’ learning gains. Pre-developed surveys are available which can be modified and are stored in a repository for ease of access. Results are anonymous and there is the ability to download comments and basic statistical analysis of responses. Feedback from the survey points to a large increase in understanding of the material coupled with an increase in confidence. In addition we outline some of the limitations of our initial implementation of this approach and what we hope to improve on for the next academic year.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leeann M. Lower-Hoppe ◽  
Liz A. Wanless ◽  
Sarah M. Aldridge ◽  
Daniel W. Jones

Experiential learning is a critical component of sport management education and industry preparation; however, the inclusion of time-intensive experiential projects can displace content learning. Blended learning integrates face-to-face and online instruction to enable the space to maximize multiple learning types. This article proposes an innovative experiential project that integrates blended learning—implemented in a sport event management course—with reflection and scholarship supporting the pedagogical strategies. The article concludes with implications to optimize blended learning (e.g., multimedia, pedagogical workshops, course evaluation), enhance communication (e.g., office hours, discussion forum, orientation video), and expand student learning outcomes (e.g., reading outlines, video lectures, student assessment).


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. ar22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan E. Bathgate ◽  
Oriana R. Aragón ◽  
Andrew J. Cavanagh ◽  
Jennifer Frederick ◽  
Mark J. Graham

Evidence-based teaching (EBT), such as active learning and formative assessment, benefits student learning but is not present in many college science classrooms. The choices faculty make about how to teach their science courses are influenced by their personal beliefs and motivations, as well as their departmental structures and institutional cultures. With data from 584 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) faculty trained in EBT, we compare which of the following factors most relate to faculty’s use of EBT: 1) faculty’s personal motivations (e.g., teaching value, confidence, beliefs about intelligence); and 2) their experiences with their institutional teaching environments (e.g., departmental support, student enthusiasm). Faculty’s perceived supports in their teaching environments (e.g., having supportive colleagues, being able to access curricular resources) were by far most predictive of their use of EBT. Faculty’s personal motivations had little to no relationship when supports were included in these models. The effects were robust, even when controlling for faculty gender, minority status, and teaching experience. Much of the literature has focused on perceived barriers to EBT implementation (e.g., lack of time, constrained teaching space). The current data indicate that a focus on building supports for faculty may have the greatest impact on increasing the presence of EBT in college STEM courses.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. es12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Withers

Finding the time for developing or locating new class materials is one of the biggest barriers for instructors reforming their teaching approaches. Even instructors who have taken part in training workshops may feel overwhelmed by the task of transforming passive lecture content to engaging learning activities. Learning cycles have been instrumental in helping K–12 science teachers design effective instruction for decades. This paper introduces the College Science Learning Cycle adapted from the popular Biological Sciences Curriculum Study 5E to help science, technology, engineering, and mathematics faculty develop course materials to support active, student-centered teaching approaches in their classrooms. The learning cycle is embedded in backward design, a learning outcomes–oriented instructional design approach, and is accompanied by resources and examples to help faculty transform their teaching in a time-efficient manner.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document