Abstract
Background
Triglyceride deposit cardiomyovasculopathy (TGCV) is a novel disease concept characterized by the excessive accumulation of triglyceride in cardiomyocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells, leading to coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure, and arrhythmia. However, it is rarely known whether TGCV contributes to the increased risk of vascular failure after drug eluting stent (DES) implantation.
Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate vascular failure after 2nd generation DES implantation in patients with TGCV.
Methods
Among 637 consecutive patients suspected of having CAD who underwent both coronary angiography and iodine-123-β-methyliodophenyl-pentadecanoic acid (BMIPP) scintigraphy between 2010 and 2018, we analyzed the data from 92 patients who met the inclusion criteria (shown in Table and Figure). Ninety-two patients were allocated to the presence (TGCV group, 11 patients) or absence (control group, 81 patients) of TGCV. All of 92 patients were implanted 2nd generation DES and underwent planned follow up coronary angiography. Control patients were diagnosed of diabetes mellitus. Binary restenosis (ISR), defined as angiographic luminal diameter ≥50% by quantitative coronary angiography, target lesion revascularization (TLR), In-stent late loss and restenosis morphology were assessed in 23 stents of TGCV group and 120 stents of control group.
Results
There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups except for the prevalence of hypertension. In-stent late loss was greater in TGCV than in control (0.45 (−0.04 to 3.33) vs. 0.15 (−0.18 to 2.75), p=0.ehz748.10067), resulting in greater incidence of ISR and TLR in TGCV than in control (34.8% vs. 10.0%, p=0.0017; 21.7% vs. 6.7%, p=0.021, respectively). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, TGCV was found to be a significant and independent predictor for ISR after 2nd generation DES implantation. Regarding restenosis morphology, diffuse and occlusive pattern of ISR, were more frequently observed in TGCV than control (87.5% and 33.3%, Fisher's exact test p=0.028).
Table 1.The 4th edition diagnostic criteria for TGCV Items Clinical findings 2 points I) BMIPP scintigraphy Wash-Out Rare <10% II) Diffuse narrowng coronary arteries 1 point III) Jordans anomaly in peripheral blood smear IV) Diabetes Decision 4 points or more → Definite TGCV
Figure 1
Conclusion
Patients with TGCV showed the greater incidence of vascular failure even after 2nd generation DES implantation, contributing to the novel risk factor for coronary intervention even in the 2nd DES era.
Comparison of Intravascular Imaging and Quantitative Coronary Angiography to Evaluate Neointimal Proliferation after Complex Lesion Stenting
