Abstract
Background：Posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF) is the most common surgical method for lumbar fusion surgery, and pedicle screws（PS）can provide effective fixation strength in normal bone. However, pedicle screws are prone to loosening in osteoporotic patients. cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw fixation and cement augmentation pedicle screw（CAPS） fixation are often used to reduce the risk of loosening. Although several studies are reported that the pullout strength of CBT screws or CAPS screws are higher than PS，There are no relevant studies on different internal fixation stress analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the stresses of different fixation methods and analyze the stresses of different internal fixation systems through finite element analysis.Methods: Five finite element models were established and tested by simulating PLIF surgery at L4/5. They included: (1) normal model (2) osteoporosis model (3) pedicle screw model; (4) cement augmentation pedicle screw（CAPS）model; (5) cortical bone trajectory (CBT) model. The range of motion (ROM), stress of fusion cage and screw-rod system of different models were analyzed by simulating flexion, extension, left bending, right bending, left rotation and right rotation movements through software.Results: The ROM of the osteoporosis model was increased compared with the normal bone, and the osteoporosis was increased by 5.3%, 17.6%, 11.5%, 11.3%, 7.5%, and 8.3% compared with the normal model during flexion, extension, left bending, right bending, left rotation, and right rotation. After fixation, the ROM decreased, but the difference was not significant between the different fixation models. The stress of the screw-rods is the minimum one in the CAPS group. the PS group is the middle one, and stress of the CBT group is max. The cage stress is the minimum in the CAPS group which is slightly smaller than the cage stress in the PS group. the cage stress was the max in the CBT group.Conclusion: PLIF can decrease the ROM of lumbar vertebra and fusion segment in osteoporosis, but different fixation methods have little effect on ROM. However, there was a great difference in the stress of implant, with the least stress in the CAPS group, the second in the PS group, and the greatest stress in the CBT. The same is true for Cage stress. At the same time, the maximum stress zone to occur at the screw-rod junction, while the maximum stress of cage occurs at the position in contact with the endplate. The study has guiding significance for clinical practice.
Selective cement augmentation of cranial and caudal pedicle screws provides comparable stability to augmentation on all segments in the osteoporotic spine: a finite element analysis
