CT-to-fluoroscopy registration versus scan-and-plan registration for robot-assisted insertion of lumbar pedicle screws

OBJECTIVE Pedicle screw insertion for stabilization after lumbar fusion surgery is commonly performed by spine surgeons. With the advent of navigation technology, the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion has increased. Robotic guidance has revolutionized the placement of pedicle screws with 2 distinct radiographic registration methods, the scan-and-plan method and CT-to-fluoroscopy method. In this study, the authors aimed to compare the accuracy and safety of these methods. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted at 2 centers to obtain operative data for consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted lumbar pedicle screw placement. The newest robotic platform (Mazor X Robotic System) was used in all cases. One center used the scan-and-plan registration method, and the other used CT-to-fluoroscopy for registration. Screw accuracy was determined by applying the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. Fluoroscopic exposure times were collected from radiology reports. RESULTS Overall, 268 patients underwent pedicle screw insertion, 126 patients with scan-and-plan registration and 142 with CT-to-fluoroscopy registration. In the scan-and-plan cohort, 450 screws were inserted across 266 spinal levels (mean 1.7 ± 1.1 screws/level), with 446 (99.1%) screws classified as Gertzbein-Robbins grade A (within the pedicle) and 4 (0.9%) as grade B (< 2-mm deviation). In the CT-to-fluoroscopy cohort, 574 screws were inserted across 280 lumbar spinal levels (mean 2.05 ± 1.7 screws/ level), with 563 (98.1%) grade A screws and 11 (1.9%) grade B (p = 0.17). The scan-and-plan cohort had nonsignificantly less fluoroscopic exposure per screw than the CT-to-fluoroscopy cohort (12 ± 13 seconds vs 11.1 ± 7 seconds, p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS Both scan-and-plan registration and CT-to-fluoroscopy registration methods were safe, accurate, and had similar fluoroscopy time exposure overall.

A Novel Bone Cement Injector Augments Osteoporotic Lumbar Pedicle Screw Channel: A Biomechanical Investigation

Background: The study aimed to invent a series of pedicle injectors and investigated the effects of the injectors with different number of holes on the augmentation of pedicle screw using bone cement in osteoporotic lumbar pedicle channel.Methods: This study used the biomechanical test module of polyurethane (Pacific Research Laboratory Corp, USA) to simulate the mechanical properties of human osteoporotic cancellous bone. The bone cement injectors were invented based on anatomical parameters of lumbar pedicle in Chinese. Mechanical test experiments were divided into three groups, namely, a local augmentation group, a full-length augmentation group, and a control group. The local augmentation group included three subgroups including 4 holes, 6 holes, and 8 holes and all holes were laterally placed. The full-length augmentation group was a straight-hole injector. The control group was defined that pedicle screws were inserted without any cement augmentation. Six screws were inserted in each group and the maximum insertion torque was recorded. After 24 hours of injecting acrylic bone cement, routine X-ray and CT examinations were performed to evaluate the distribution of bone cement. The axial pull-out force of screws was tested with the help of the MTS 858 mechanical tester.Results: The bone cement injectors were consisted of the sheaths and the steel-rods and the sheaths had different number of lateral holes. The control group had the lowest maximum insertion torque as compared with the 4-hole, 6-hole, 8-hole, and straight pore groups (P<0.01), but the difference between the 4-hole, 6-hole, 8-hole, and straight pore groups was no statistical significance. The control group had the lowest maximum axial pull-out force as compared with the other four groups (P<0.01). Subgroup analysis showed the 8-hole group (161.35±27.17 N) had the lower maximum axial pull-out force as compared with the 4-hole (217.29±49.68 N), 6-hole (228.39±57.83 N), and straight pore groups (237.55±35.96 N) (P<0.01). Bone cement was mainly distributed in 1/3 of the distal end of the screw among the 4-hole group, in the middle 1/3 and distal end of the screw among the 6-hole group, in the proximal 1/3 of the screw among the 8-hole group, and along the long axis of the whole screw body in the straight pore group. It might indicate that the 8-hole and straight-hole groups were more vulnerable to spinal canal cement leakage. After pullout, bone cement was also closely connected with the screw without any looseness or fragmentation.Conclusions: The bone cement injectors with different number of holes can be used to augment the pedicle screw channel. The pedicle screw augmented by the 4-hole or 6-hole sheath may have similar effects to the straight pore injector. However, the 8-hole injector may result in relatively lower pull-out strength and the straight pore injector has the risks of cement leakage as well as cement solidarization near the screw head.

Confirmation of accuracy/inaccuracy of lumbar pedicle screw placement using postoperative computed tomography

Background: Transpedicular screws are extensively utilized in lumbar spine surgery. The placement of these screws is typically guided by anatomical landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy. Here, we utilized 2-week postoperative computed tomography (CT) studies to confirm the accuracy/inaccuracy of lumbar pedicle screw placement in 145 patients and correlated these findings with clinical outcomes. Methods: Over 6 months, we prospectively evaluated the location of 612 pedicle screws placed in 145 patients undergoing instrumented lumbar fusions addressing diverse pathology with instability. Routine anteroposterior and lateral plain radiographs were obtained 48 h after the surgery, while CT scans were obtained at 2 postoperative weeks (i.e., ideally these should have been performed intraoperatively or within 24–48 h of surgery). Results: Of the 612 screws, minor misplacement of screws (≤2 mm) was seen in 104 patients, moderate misplacement in 34 patients (2–4 mm), and severe misplacement in 7 patients (>4 mm). Notably, all the latter 7 (4.8% of the 145) patients required repeated operative intervention. Conclusion: Transpedicular screw insertion in the lumbar spine carries the risks of pedicle medial/lateral violation that is best confirmed on CT rather than X-rays/fluoroscopy alone. Here, we additional found 7 patients (4.8%) who with severe medial/lateral pedicle breach who warranting repeated operative intervention. In the future, CT studies should be performed intraoperatively or within 24–48 h of surgery to confirm the location of pedicle screws and rule in our out medial or lateral pedicle breaches.

Multiple-rod constructs and use of bone morphogenetic protein–2 in relation to lower rod fracture rates in 141 patients with adult spinal deformity who underwent lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare rod fracture (RF) rates among three types of rod constructs (RCs) following lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS A retrospective review of consecutive patients with adult spinal deformity who were treated with lumbar PSO between 2007 and 2017 was performed. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Three RCs were compared: standard (2 main rods), satellite (2 main rods with satellite rod), and nested (2 main rods and 2 short rods spanning osteotomy). Outcomes examined included RF rate, time to RF, pseudarthrosis, and reoperation. Multivariate analysis was used. RESULTS A total of 141 patients were included 55 with standard, 23 with satellite, and 63 with nested RCs. The mean age was 65.2 years and 34.8% of patients were male. Radiographic preoperative and postoperative results were as follows: sagittal vertical axis (11.0 vs 3.9 cm), lumbar lordosis (28.5° vs 57.1°), pelvic tilt (30.6° vs 21.0°), pelvic incidence (61.5° vs 60.0°), distance between central sacral vertical line and C7 plumb line (2.2 vs 1.5 cm), and scoliosis (18.9° vs 11.3°). The average time to RF was 12.4 months. Overall RF, bilateral RF, pseudarthrosis, and reoperation rates were 22.7%, 5.0%, 20.6%, and 17.7%, respectively. Standard RCs had a significantly higher RF (36.4% vs 13.0% vs 14.3%, p = 0.008), bilateral RF (35.0% vs 0.0% vs 0.0%, p = 0.021), pseudarthrosis (34.5% vs 8.7% vs 12.7%, p = 0.004), and reoperation (30.9% vs 4.3% vs 11.1%, p = 0.004) rates. Satellite RCs (OR 0.21, p = 0.015), nested RCs (OR 0.24, p = 0.003), and bone morphogenetic protein–2 (OR 0.28, p = 0.005) were independently associated with lower odds of RF. CONCLUSIONS Use of multiple rods in the satellite RC and nested RC groups was associated with lower rates of RF, pseudarthrosis, and reoperations following lumbar PSO. Bone morphogenetic protein–2 was associated with a reduction in RF rate as well.

Application of a Novel Attachable Magnetic Nerve Stimulating Probe in Intraoperative Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement: A Porcine Model Study

Pedicle screw instrumentation is a fundamental technique in lumbar spine surgery. However, several complications could occur when placing a pedicle screw, the most serious being damage to the neural structures. We developed an attachable magnetic nerve stimulating probe used for triggered electromyography (t-EMG) to avoid these. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of this probe for intraoperative neuromonitoring (ION) during lumbar pedicle screw placement in a porcine model. Forty pedicle screws were inserted bilaterally into the pedicles of the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae of five pigs; 20 were inserted typically into the pedicle without nerve damage (Group A), and the other 20 were inserted through the broken medial wall of the pedicle to permit contact with the neural structures (Group B). We measured the triggered threshold for pedicle screw placement through the conventional nerve probe and our newly developed magnetic probe. There was no significant difference in the triggered threshold between the two instruments (p = 0.828). Our newly developed magnetic stimulating probe can be attached to a screwdriver, thus preventing real-time screw malpositioning and making it practical and equally safe. This probe could become indispensable in revision spine surgeries with severe adhesions or endoscopic spine surgeries.

Micro-computed tomography analysis of the lumbar pedicle wall

Background Although the pedicle is routinely used as a surgical fixation site, the pedicle wall bone area fraction (bone area per unit area) and its distribution at the isthmus of the pedicle remain unknown. The bone area fraction at the pedicle isthmus is an important factor contributing to the strength of pedicle screw constructs. This study investigates the lumbar pedicle wall microstructure based on micro-computed tomography. Methods Six fresh-frozen cadaveric lumbar spines were analyzed. Left and right pedicles of each vertebra from L1 to L5 were resected for micro-computed tomography scanning. Data was analyzed with custom-written software to determine regional variation in pedicle wall bone area fraction. The pedicular cross-section was divided into four regions: lateral, medial, cranial, and caudal. The mean bone area fraction values for each region were calculated for all lumbar spine levels. Results The lateral region showed lower bone area fraction than the medial region at all spinal levels. Bone area fraction in the medial region was the highest at all levels except for L4, and the median values were 99.8% (95.9–100%). There were significant differences between the lateral region and the caudal region at L1, L2 and L3, but none at L4 and L5. The bone area fraction in the lateral region was less than 64% at all spinal levels and that in the caudal region was less than 67% at the L4 and L5 levels. Conclusions This study provides initial detailed data on the lumbar pedicle wall microstructure based on micro-computed tomography. These findings may explain why there is a higher incidence of pedicle screw breach in the pedicle lateral and caudal walls.

Triggered Electromyography is a Useful Intraoperative Adjunct to Predict Postoperative Neurological Deficit Following Lumbar Pedicle Screw Instrumentation

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objectives: Malposition of pedicle screws during instrumentation in the lumbar spine is associated with complications secondary to spinal cord or nerve root injury. Intraoperative triggered electromyographic monitoring (t-EMG) may be used during instrumentation for early detection of malposition. The association between lumbar pedicle screws stimulated at low EMG thresholds and postoperative neurological deficits, however, remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to assess whether a low threshold t-EMG response to lumbar pedicle screw stimulation can serve as a predictive tool for postoperative neurological deficit. Methods: The present study is a meta-analysis of the literature from PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase identifying prospective/retrospective studies with outcomes of patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with t-EMG testing. Results: The total study cohort consisted of 2,236 patients and the total postoperative neurological deficit rate was 3.04%. 10.78% of the patients incurred at least 1 pedicle screw that was stimulated below the respective EMG alarm threshold intraoperatively. The incidence of postoperative neurological deficits in patients with a lumbar pedicle screw stimulated below EMG alarm threshold during placement was 13.28%, while only 1.80% in the patients without. The pooled DOR was 10.14. Sensitivity was 49% while specificity was 88%. Conclusions: Electrically activated lumbar pedicle screws resulting in low t-EMG alarm thresholds are highly specific but weakly sensitive for new postoperative neurological deficits. Patients with new postoperative neurological deficits after lumbar spine surgery were 10 times more likely to have had a lumbar pedicle screw stimulated at a low EMG threshold.