scholarly journals Complications on minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L2–L5 levels: a review of the literature and surgical strategies

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 101-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Quillo-Olvera ◽  
Guang-Xun Lin ◽  
Hyun-Jin Jo ◽  
Jin-Sung Kim
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Surgical Strategies ◽  
Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion

scholarly journals Minimally invasive L5–S1 oblique lumbar interbody fusion with anterior plate

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (videosuppl1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Martin H. Pham ◽  
Andre M. Jakoi ◽  
Patrick C. Hsieh
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Degenerative Disc Disease ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Anterior Plate ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Lumbar interbody fusion is an important technique for the treatment of degenerative disc disease and degenerative scoliosis. The oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) establishes a minimally invasive retroperitoneal exposure anterior to the psoas and lumbar plexus. In this video case presentation, the authors demonstrate the techniques of the OLIF at L5–S1 performed on a 69-year-old female with degenerative scoliosis as one component of an overall strategy for her deformity correction.The video can be found here: https://youtu.be/VMUYWKLAl0g.

Minimally invasive surgery for low-grade spondylolisthesis: percutaneous endoscopic or oblique lumbar interbody fusion

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 639-650
Author(s):  
Mengran Jin ◽  
Guokang Xu ◽  
Tong Shen ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Haiyu Shao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Foraminal Height ◽  
Perioperative Risks

Aim: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic-assisted lumbar interbody fusion (PELIF) versus oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) for the treatment of symptomatic low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis. Material & methods: The clinical and radiographic records of 48 patients underwent single-level minimally invasive lumbar fusion with a PELIF (n = 16) or OLIF (n = 32) were reviewed. Results: The clinical and radiographic outcomes were similar in both groups. PELIF procedure exhibited superior capability of the enlargement of foraminal width, but inferior capability of the restoration of foraminal height than OLIF procedure. Conclusion: PELIF minimizes the iatrogenic damages and perioperative risks to a great extent, and seems to be a promising option for the treatment of symptomatic low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Minimally invasive surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: transforaminal or oblique lumbar interbody fusion

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun-Ren Sheng ◽  
Yi-Bo Geng ◽  
Kai-Liang Zhou ◽  
Ai-Min Wu ◽  
Xiang-Yang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Postoperative Changes ◽  
Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Aim: To compare the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for degenerative spondylolisthesis transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). Materials & methods: The clinical and surgical characteristics and outcomes of 38 patients with MIS–OLIF and 55 with MIS–TLIF were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Procedures and hospital stay were shorter and blood loss was less, with MIS–OLIF than with MIS–OLIF. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were similar. Postoperative changes in disk height and foraminal dimension were greater and patient satisfaction was better with MIS–OLIF than with MIS–TLIF. Conclusion: The clinical findings associated with the two procedures were similar; but patients preferred MIS–OLIF, which is less invasive, to MIS–TLIF. Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR1800019443.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document