scholarly journals AB192. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2018—attitudes and expectations of patients and doctors relating to data protection and clinical research

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. AB192-AB192
Author(s):  
John Phineas O’Donnell ◽  
Peter McAnena ◽  
Matt Davey ◽  
Aoife Lowery ◽  
Michael Kerin
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Research ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
General Data

scholarly journals Uso dos Registos Clínicos Eletrónicos para Investigação: Novos Desafios Éticos e Soluções Possíveis

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 332
Author(s):  
Carlos Meneses-Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Retrospective Studies ◽  
Ethics Committees ◽  
Sensitive Data ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
General Data ◽  
The Government

Some clinicians feel that Ethics Committees act as a blockade to observational clinical studies. In the case of retrospective studies some have tried to solve this problem by reducing this sensitive data to simple administrative data in the hands of the government. Others see the new European General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (European Union) as being more liberal than the Portuguese Law nº 21/2014, April 16th (Clinical Research Law). Both solutions presume participant consent from his / her silence, even if nobody truly tried to specifically inform him / her. Such views do collide with the guarantees of protection of patient’s ethical rights. In this article we propose an ethical alternative to those positions.

Making the General Data Protection Regulation work

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Hopp ◽  
Christian Wiese Svanberg
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
General Data
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document