scholarly journals Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence Among Men in Methadone Treatment Programs in New York City

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (7) ◽  
pp. 1230-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabila El-Bassel ◽  
Louisa Gilbert ◽  
Elwin Wu ◽  
Mingway Chang ◽  
Jorge Fontdevila
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
New York City ◽  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
York City ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Methadone Treatment ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Treatment Programs

HIV and intimate partner violence among methadone-maintained women in New York City

2005 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabila El-Bassel ◽  
Louisa Gilbert ◽  
Elwin Wu ◽  
Hyun Go ◽  
Jennifer Hill
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
New York City ◽  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
York City ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Intimate Partner

scholarly journals Intimate Partner Violence and Consistent Condom Use Among Drug-Using Heterosexual Women in New York City

2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subadra Panchanadeswaran ◽  
Victoria Frye ◽  
Vijay Nandi ◽  
Sandro Galea ◽  
David Vlahov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
New York City ◽  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Condom Use ◽  
York City ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Consistent Condom ◽  
Consistent Condom Use ◽  
Heterosexual Women

Assessing States’ Intimate Partner Violence Offender Treatment Standards using a Principles of Effective Intervention Framework

2021 ◽  
pp. 088626052110500
Author(s):  
Tara N. Richards ◽  
Angela R. Gover ◽  
Caralin Branscum ◽  
Alyssa Nystrom ◽  
Taylor Claxton
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Effective Intervention ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Treatment Programs ◽  
Offender Treatment ◽  
Treatment Standards ◽  
Risk Levels ◽  
Training Requirements

Court-ordered treatment programs are a widely used response to intimate partner violence (IPV) and many states have developed standards to guide programs. The current study provides an update to Maiuro and Eberle’s. (2008) review of states’ standards and extends the literature by using the principles of effective intervention (PEIs; i.e., risk, need, responsivity, treatment, and fidelity) as an organizational framework to examine standards. Findings showed that 84% of states had standards in 2020, compared to 88% in 2007, and extensive changes both within and across states’ standards had occurred. Regarding the PEIs, in line with the risk principle most states mandated the use of risk assessments; inconsistent with the needs principle, few states used these assessments to classify clients into risk levels or inform individualized treatment. The majority of standards addressed the treatment principle by outlining a required structure and duration, but few attended to responsivity factors (e.g., identifying treatment modalities, attending to specific client factors). Regarding the fidelity principle, most standards outlined education or training requirements for staff and required periodic program reviews or audits, but few standards were evidenced-based and only about half required that programs collect data to measure effectiveness. Taken together, findings suggest that standards have continued to evolve and that the integration of PEIs into IPV treatment is only just beginning. Standards provide a rich opportunity for future researcher–practitioner partnerships in the field of IPV intervention.

Indicators of nutritional status among clients from a New York City methadone treatment center

1990 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Herbert ◽  
Stuart E. Nichols ◽  
Geoffrey C. Kabat
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
New York City ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
York City ◽  
Methadone Treatment ◽  
Treatment Center
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document