scholarly journals Tip-Apex Distance Is Most Important of Six Predictors of Screw Cutout After Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures in Women

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. e0022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Fujii ◽  
Shun Nakayama ◽  
Masahiko Hara ◽  
Wataru Koizumi ◽  
Takashi Itabashi ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Liu ◽  
Wenhui Ma ◽  
Sikai Liu ◽  
Xiao Chen ◽  
Mengnan Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Acetabular fracture and concomitant ipsilateral intertrochanteric femur fracture has been suggested as an unusual traumatic presentation and rarely reported in the literature. The aims of this study were (1) to identify the etiological characteristics, (2) to summarize the treatment strategy, and (3) to present the mid- to long-term results of patients with this rare traumatic presentation. Methods In this retrospective study, 18 patients (15 males, 3 females; mean age = 42.77 ± 17.74 years, range = 16 to 87 years) who were diagnosed and treated for simultaneous acetabular fracture and ipsilateral intertrochanteric fracture were included. Injury mechanisms, fracture classifications, and treatment strategies were noted. To assess functional status, the Harris score was used. To evaluate pain intensity, visual analogous scale (VAS) was used. The reduction quality of acetabular fractures was examined as per Matta’s standard. Postoperative complications were also recorded. Results The mean follow-up was 10.04 ± 3.38 (range = 6.2 to 16 years). The most common injury mechanism was traffic accident, followed by falling from a tall height. As per the Evans classification, intertrochanteric fractures were defined as type 3 in 13 patients, type 2 in one patient, and type 4 in 4 patients. In acetabular fracture site, the most common fractures were posterior wall fractures, followed by anterior column fractures. All patients received internal fixation for their intertrochanteric fractures. Ten out of 18 patients also received internal fixation for their acetabular fracture. However, for the remaining patients, acetabular fractures were treated conservatively or with fracture fragment resection. Bony healing was achieved in all but one patient who died postoperatively. Twelve patients achieved excellent and good results (Harris score ≥ 80 points) whereas five patients achieved fair and poor results (Harris score < 80 points). The proportion of patients who achieved an excellent-good Harris score was 70.6%. Dislocation of the hip was found to be an independent risk factor (HR = 9.194, 95% CI = 1.024-82.515) for the poor patient outcome. Conclusion To sum up, high-impact trauma is the main cause of acetabular fracture and concomitant ipsilateral intertrochanteric femur fracture. For patients who have undergone surgical treatment, fracture healing is usually achieved. However, the occurrence of complications, especially avascular necrosis, is the major cause of a poor prognosis. Dislocation of the hip joint at the time of injury is considered to be an important risk factor for a poor prognosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 1746-1752
Author(s):  
Yugang Teng ◽  
Yuanzhen Zhang ◽  
Zhenyu Wang

Objective: Based on the observation of Computed Tomography (CT) image analysis technique, the efficacy of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and Dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly was analyzed. Methods: Thirty-nine elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures were randomly divided into two groups: 19 patients in the DHS internal fixation group and 20 patients in the PFNA group. They were treated with DHS and PFNA internal fixation, and were observed based on CT image analysis techniques. The patient performs follow-up testing of the procedure before and after surgery. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in mean operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the groups (P < 0.01). The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications was statistically different between the two groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative and postoperative complications in the PFNA group was lower than that in the DHS group. The excellent and good rates of DHS group and PFNA group were 89.47% and 95.00%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference in fracture healing time between the PFNA group and the DHS group (P < 0.01). Discussion: Compared with DHS, PFNA has the advantages of short operation time, low bleeding volume and short hospital stay. There were 7 cases of internal fixation failure or non-union in the DHS group and 1 case of delayed healing in the PFNA group. Conclusion: DHS and PFNA were used to treat intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. After observation by CT image analysis technique, there was no significant difference in efficacy. The average operative time of PFNA was the shortest, the intraoperative blood loss was the least, the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications was low, and the fracture healing time was short. PFNA has a lesser effect on the blood circulation and bone destruction at the fracture end, and it is more secure. It is a reasonable surgical method for the treatment of senile osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures.


2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Hyung Gyu Kim ◽  
Byeong Mun Park ◽  
Kyeong Seop Song ◽  
Chang Hun Sung ◽  
Jong Min Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document