ORAL VERSUS WRITTEN ASSESSMENT: UNIVERSITY STUDENT'S OPINION IN HEALTH SCIENCES. A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Author(s):  
Nuria Padrós-Flores ◽  
Maria del Carmen Grijota-Martínez ◽  
Maria Violeta Gómez-Vicente ◽  
Gema Esquiva Sobrino ◽  
José Victor García Velasco ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 380-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagrario Pérez- de la Cruz ◽  
Amelia Victoria García- Luengo

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoomeh Shahsavari ◽  
Fatemeh Karami Robati ◽  
Atefeh Ahmadi ◽  
Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi ◽  
Bagher Amirheidari ◽  
...  

The main indicators of higher education (HE) internationalization in the field of awarding degrees are the international development of disciplines and interdisciplinary sciences, new educational and learning methods, new and updated curricula, and their correct ways of sharing. This study aimed to examine the system of awarding degrees in health HE of Iran and the United Kingdom. This descriptive-comparative study focused on the field of medical sciences and its related disciplines. The vital information about the variables was collected by visiting the official websites of the UK universities and related or joint organizations. The related information to the Kerman University of Medical Sciences as a sample of Iran medical universities was obtained from the university’s Farabar system. All data extraction steps were performed manually. There were differences in the mechanism of setting up a new discipline and the process of students’ admission, diversity of degrees’ titles and curriculums, stability of disciplines over the time, creativity in creating competition between different disciplines, the reason for establishing a discipline and the requirements for certification and awarding of degrees in health sciences disciplines in Iran and the United Kingdom were described. Propelling of medical education in the health sciences area towards standard awarding degree systems can be responsible for the requirements of internationalization of higher education.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 990-993
Author(s):  
AK Chaurasia ◽  
AK Sinha ◽  
P Upahdyay

Background: Semen analysis is used to evaluate male fertility. The aim of this study was to compare the results of semen analysis using manual method and automated sperm analyzer.Materials and Methods: This was a comparative study of 50 cases of semen analysis done in the Department of Pathology at the B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences from March 2009 to March 2010. The automated sperm analyzer did not show the WHO parameters of patients who had functional sperm count (FSC) less than five hundred thousand (500,000). Semen analysis of each of the case included in the study was done by manual and automated method (using SQAII-P analyzer).Results: Out of 31 patients, the mean age of the patients was 28.56 years with youngest patient of 20 years and eldest of 45 year. Sensitivity and specificity was 100% in analysis of sperm concentration by both the methods. Sperm motility analysis showed 100% sensitivity and 81.81% specificity. Sperm morphology analysis showed 100% sensitivity and 34.48% specificity.Conclusion: It was observed that the automated method is much quicker and precise than the conventional, manual method for semen analysis.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Oliveira Ferreira de Souza ◽  
Éve‐Marie Frigon ◽  
Robert Tremblay‐Laliberté ◽  
Christian Casanova ◽  
Denis Boire

2001 ◽  
Vol 268 (6) ◽  
pp. 1739-1748
Author(s):  
Aitor Hierro ◽  
Jesus M. Arizmendi ◽  
Javier De Las Rivas ◽  
M. Angeles Urbaneja ◽  
Adelina Prado ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document