Deep crustal structure across a young passive margin from wide-angle and reflection seismic data (The SARDINIA Experiment) – II. Sardinia’s margin

2015 ◽  
Vol 186 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 331-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Afilhado ◽  
Maryline Moulin ◽  
Daniel Aslanian ◽  
Philippe Schnürle ◽  
Frauke Klingelhoefer ◽  
...  

Abstract Geophysical data acquired on the conjugate margins system of the Gulf of Lion and West Sardinia (GLWS) is unique in its ability to address fundamental questions about rifting (i.e. crustal thinning, the nature of the continent-ocean transition zone, the style of rifting and subsequent evolution, and the connection between deep and surface processes). While the Gulf of Lion (GoL) was the site of several deep seismic experiments, which occurred before the SARDINIA Experiment (ESP and ECORS Experiments in 1981 and 1988 respectively), the crustal structure of the West Sardinia margin remains unknown. This paper describes the first modeling of wide-angle and near-vertical reflection multi-channel seismic (MCS) profiles crossing the West Sardinia margin, in the Mediterranean Sea. The profiles were acquired, together with the exact conjugate of the profiles crossing the GoL, during the SARDINIA experiment in December 2006 with the French R/V L’Atalante. Forward wide-angle modeling of both data sets (wide-angle and multi-channel seismic) confirms that the margin is characterized by three distinct domains following the onshore unthinned, 26 km-thick continental crust : Domain V, where the crust thins from ~26 to 6 km in a width of about 75 km; Domain IV where the basement is characterized by high velocity gradients and lower crustal seismic velocities from 6.8 to 7.25 km/s, which are atypical for either crustal or upper mantle material, and Domain III composed of “atypical” oceanic crust. The structure observed on the West Sardinian margin presents a distribution of seismic velocities that is symmetrical with those observed on the Gulf of Lion’s side, except for the dimension of each domain and with respect to the initiation of seafloor spreading. This result does not support the hypothesis of simple shear mechanism operating along a lithospheric detachment during the formation of the Liguro-Provencal basin.

2015 ◽  
Vol 186 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 309-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryline Moulin ◽  
Frauke Klingelhoefer ◽  
Alexandra Afilhado ◽  
Daniel Aslanian ◽  
Philippe Schnurle ◽  
...  

Abstract The conjugate margins system of the Gulf of Lion and West Sardinia (GLWS) represents a unique natural laboratory for addressing fundamental questions about rifting due to its landlocked situation, its youth, its thick sedimentary layers, including prominent palaeo-marker such as the MSC event, and the amount of available data and multidisciplinary studies. The main goals of the SARDINIA experiment, were to (i) investigate the deep structure of the entire system within the two conjugate margins: the Gulf of Lion and West Sardinia, (ii) characterize the nature of the crust, and (iii) define the geometry of the basin and provide important constrains on its genesis. This paper presents the results of P-wave velocity modelling on three coincident near-vertical reflection multi-channel seismic (MCS) and wide-angle seismic profiles acquired in the Gulf of Lion, to a depth of 35 km. A companion paper [part II – Afilhado et al., 2015] addresses the results of two other SARDINIA profiles located on the oriental conjugate West Sardinian margin. Forward wide-angle modelling of both data sets confirms that the margin is characterised by three distinct domains following the onshore unthinned, 33 km-thick continental crust domain: Domain I is bounded by two necking zones, where the crust thins respectively from ~30 to 20 and from 20 to 7 km over a width of about 170 km; the outermost necking is imprinted by the well-known T-reflector at its crustal base; Domain II is characterised by a 7 km-thick crust with « anomalous » velocities ranging from 6 to 7.5 km/s; it represents the transition between the thinned continental crust (Domain I) and a very thin (only 4–5 km) “atypical” oceanic crust (Domain III). In Domain II, the hypothesis of the presence of exhumed mantle is falsified by our results: this domain may likely consist of a thin exhumed lower continental crust overlying a heterogeneous, intruded lower layer. Moreover, despite the difference in their magnetic signatures, Domains II and III present the very similar seismic velocities profiles, and we discuss the possibility of a connection between these two different domains.


2015 ◽  
Vol 656 ◽  
pp. 154-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Biari ◽  
F. Klingelhoefer ◽  
M. Sahabi ◽  
D. Aslanian ◽  
P. Schnurle ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 4712-4733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alba Gil ◽  
Josep Gallart ◽  
Jordi Diaz ◽  
Ramon Carbonell ◽  
Montserrat Torne ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Contrucci ◽  
F. Klingelhöfer ◽  
J. Perrot ◽  
R. Bartolome ◽  
M.-A. Gutscher ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.S. Surkov ◽  
V.I. Lotyshev

A sparse network of regional profiles developed in Siberia using deep seismic sounding methods (DSS) does not allow a valid three dimensional model of Siberian deep crustal structure to be constructed. To create such a model, interpretation methods of available geophysical and geological data are suggested. These are based on modelling of geological objects using potential fields. Information on DSS key profiles is considered to be key data.The results of such interpretation are shown in the crustal thickness map and in that of crystalline basement, as well as on a deep geological-geophysical profile across the West Siberian Plate and Siberian Platform. The crustal thickness in Siberia varies from 30 to 55 km. It is on average 4?6 km thicker on the Siberian Platform than the West Siberian Plate. The least crustal thickness of 30 to 33 km appears to be beneath regions with maximum thickness of Mesozoic deposits. Modern and Early Mesozoic rift zones are characterized by decreased crustal thickness of 36?39 km. Ancient shields of the Siberian Platform and adjacent folded mountain units are up to 45?55 km thick.The geometry of the top of crystalline basement in the young West Siberian Plate is sharply different from that of the ancient Siberian Platform. Within the West Siberian Plate structural features with 5 to 11 km of relief dominate, while on the Siberian Platform the structural relief varies from 2?3 to 14 km.The peculiarities of deep crustal structure have greatly influenced the formation and distribution of sedimentary units. The constructed section shows the depths and thicknesses of the Riphean, Vendian?Silurian, Devonian?Middle Triassic and Mesozoic?Cenozoic megacomplexes, most promising for oil and gas in Siberia. Data obtained on the deep structure of Siberian Platform regions are thus of great practical importance. They can be used to predict areas of petroleum potential and determine optimal trends of further oil and gas exploration by geophysical methods.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frauke Klingelhoefer ◽  
Daniel Aslanian* ◽  
Cynthia Labails ◽  
Jean-Louis Olivet ◽  
Hervé Nouzé ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Frauke Klingelhoefer ◽  
Isabelle Contrucci ◽  
Daniel Aslanian ◽  
Cynthia Labails ◽  
Jean-Louis Olivet ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document