COMPARATIVE OUTCOME OF TEMPORAL FASCIA AND TRAGAL CARTILAGE GRAFT IN TYPE 1 TYMPANOPLASTY

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (II) ◽  
pp. 12-17
Author(s):  
Gurshinderpal Singh Shergill ◽  
◽  
Deepak Ranjan Nayak ◽  
Ankur Kaur Shergill ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cartilage Graft ◽  
Type 1 Tympanoplasty ◽  
Temporal Fascia

Comparison of cartilage graft and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 136 (11) ◽  
pp. 1085-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Yang ◽  
Xuewen Wu ◽  
Xiaofei Peng ◽  
Yanni Zhang ◽  
Shaobing Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cartilage Graft ◽  
Type 1 Tympanoplasty

scholarly journals Comparison of Reinforcement Cartilage Graft and Temporalis Fascia Graft in Type 1 Tympanoplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-110
Author(s):  
Md Mainul Islam ◽  
Kanu Lal Saha ◽  
Harun Ar Rashid Talukder ◽  
Md Khalid Mahmud ◽  
Riashat Azim Majumder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tympanic Membrane ◽  
Middle Ear ◽  
Uptake Rate ◽  
Cartilage Graft ◽  
Temporalis Fascia ◽  
Hearing Gain ◽  
Type 1 Tympanoplasty ◽  
Fascia Graft ◽  
Cartilage Tympanoplasty

Background: Chronic otitis media (COM) is the long-standing infection of a part or whole of middle ear cleft characterized by ear discharge and perforation. It is the commonest ear problem in adult and children. Most common presenting symptoms are ear discharge, mild to severe hearing loss, sometimes tinnitus even vertigo. Treatment of COM is mainly operative. Inactive mucosal variety of COM presents with the perforation in tympanic membrane with non-inflamed middle ear mucosa. The treatment of inactive mucosal variety of COM is Type 1tympanoplasty. It can be done by conventional temporalis fascia or cartilage graft. Both have some merits and demerits. Objective: To compare the the outcomes between reinforcement cartilage graft and temporalis fascia graft in type -1 tympanoplasty. Methods: 86 (43 patients in each group) patients with COM (inactive mucosal) who were admitted in the department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka from January 2018 to June 2019, and had fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for the study. History, examinations, investigations were done. All patients underwent type 1 tympanoplasty. Prior to surgery relevant investigations were done and informed written consent was taken from all patients. In Group-A reinforcement cartilage tympanoplasty cases and in Group-B temporalis fascia tympanoplasty cases were placed. Post-operative graft uptake rate and hearing gain were compared in two groups Results: The surgical outcomes between reinforcement cartilage tympanoplasty in comparison with temporalis fascia tympanoplasty showed no significant difference of graft uptake rate and hearing gain. Conclusion: Cartilage tympanoplasty has been practised for reconstruction of perforated tympanic membrane in COM since long with variable results. Graft uptake rate in cartilage reinforcement is comparatively better than temporalis fascia graft. So, reinforcement cartilage graft can be adopted as an alternative to temporalis fascia graft in type- I tympanoplasty. Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 27(2): 104-110

A Comparative Study of Temporalis Fascia Graft and Full Thickness Tragal Island Cartilage Graft in Type 1 Tympanoplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepakraj Venkatesan ◽  
Preethi Umamaheswaran ◽  
Ramkumar Vellikkannu ◽  
Senthil Kannan ◽  
Alagammai Sivaraman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Cartilage Graft ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Temporalis Fascia ◽  
Type 1 Tympanoplasty ◽  
Fascia Graft

Modification of Surgical Procedures of Type 1 Tympanoplasty for Non-Cholesteatomatous Chronic Otitis Media

ORL ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akinobu Kakigi ◽  
Taizo Takeda ◽  
Hiroaki Nakatani ◽  
Kenichi Kozakura ◽  
Shoichi Sawada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Otitis Media ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Chronic Otitis Media ◽  
Type 1 Tympanoplasty

scholarly journals Is Allergic Rhinitis a Factor That Affects Success of Tympanoplasty?

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-13
Author(s):  
Elif Ersoy Callioglu ◽  
A. Sami Bercin ◽  
Hayati Kale ◽  
Togay Muderris ◽  
Sule Demirci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Middle Ear ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Type 1 Tympanoplasty ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Groups ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Graft Success

Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of allergic rhinitis on the success of the operation in chronic otitis surgery by using score for allergic rhinitis (SFAR). Materials and Methods: In the present study; 121 patients, who underwent type 1 tympanoplasty were examined retrospectively. SFAR of all patients were recorded. The graft success rates of 26 patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) and 95 patients with no allergic rhinitis group (NAR) were compared. Results: While the graft success rate in NAR group was 89.5%, this rate was 80.8% in the AR group. However, the difference between groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.311). Conclusion: These findings suggest that allergic rhinitis decreases the graft success rate of the pathologies occurring in eustachian tube, middle ear and mastoid although statistically significant difference wasn’t found. Prospective studies with larger patient groups are required in order to evaluate this pathology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document