ENDOSCOPIC CARTILAGE TYMPANOPLASTY. OUR TECHNIQUE AND EXPERIENCE OF 157 CASES

Objective: To assess the graft take rate and hearing gain in trans-canal endoscopic tympanoplasty Study Design: Descriptive study. Place and Duration of Study: Pakistan Naval Ship Hafeez, Islamabad Pakistan, form Dec 2015 to Jun 2018 Methodology: All patients with dry central perforations of >3 months history were included in the study. All Patients with perforations of pars tensa were booked for endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty. All perforations were divided into four types small, medium, large and subtotal or total based on size of the tympanic membrane perforations. Small perforations involving <25% area of Pars Tensa. Medium perforation are Perforations involving 25-50% of Tympanic membrane. Large perforations include Perforations involving 50-75% of pars tensa. Subtotal or total perforations are defined as perforations with >75% perforation of the tympanic membranes. Wet Ears and perforations involving the Pars Flacida were excluded from the study. Preoperative Audiogram was carried out for all patients and A-B Gap were noted for all groups separately so as the demographic data including age and gender. Success was defined as complete closure of Tympanic membrane perforation at 3 months. All patients were operated with 0 Degree 3mm, 14cm rigid endoscope under general anesthesia. Results: Mean age of patients was. 37 years and standard deviation was 12.34 (range 12-58 years). Out of total 157 cases 81 patients male were males (51%) and 76 patients were females (49). Out of 157 ears operated 146 Perforations healed completely an overall success rate of 92%. Patients with small perforations had 100 percent success.....

Comparison of Reinforcement Cartilage Graft and Temporalis Fascia Graft in Type 1 Tympanoplasty

Background: Chronic otitis media (COM) is the long-standing infection of a part or whole of middle ear cleft characterized by ear discharge and perforation. It is the commonest ear problem in adult and children. Most common presenting symptoms are ear discharge, mild to severe hearing loss, sometimes tinnitus even vertigo. Treatment of COM is mainly operative. Inactive mucosal variety of COM presents with the perforation in tympanic membrane with non-inflamed middle ear mucosa. The treatment of inactive mucosal variety of COM is Type 1tympanoplasty. It can be done by conventional temporalis fascia or cartilage graft. Both have some merits and demerits. Objective: To compare the the outcomes between reinforcement cartilage graft and temporalis fascia graft in type -1 tympanoplasty. Methods: 86 (43 patients in each group) patients with COM (inactive mucosal) who were admitted in the department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka from January 2018 to June 2019, and had fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for the study. History, examinations, investigations were done. All patients underwent type 1 tympanoplasty. Prior to surgery relevant investigations were done and informed written consent was taken from all patients. In Group-A reinforcement cartilage tympanoplasty cases and in Group-B temporalis fascia tympanoplasty cases were placed. Post-operative graft uptake rate and hearing gain were compared in two groups Results: The surgical outcomes between reinforcement cartilage tympanoplasty in comparison with temporalis fascia tympanoplasty showed no significant difference of graft uptake rate and hearing gain. Conclusion: Cartilage tympanoplasty has been practised for reconstruction of perforated tympanic membrane in COM since long with variable results. Graft uptake rate in cartilage reinforcement is comparatively better than temporalis fascia graft. So, reinforcement cartilage graft can be adopted as an alternative to temporalis fascia graft in type- I tympanoplasty. Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 27(2): 104-110

Inlay butterfly versus underlay cartilage tympanoplasty

Background Tympanic membrane grafting is one of the most common otological procedures. Underlay technique of tympanoplasty was described by Shea in 1960. Utech in 1959 introduce the cartilage in middle ear surgery. The search for an ideal graft material and technique for tympanoplasty was adopted by numerous contributions from surgeons all over the world. Professor Roland Eavey in 1998 introduced a transcanal inlay technique which offers advantages of surgical ease and speed as well as patient comfort. Results This study included 46 patients; 23 patients had inlay butterfly myringoplasty (group A), and 23 patients had underlay cartilage tympanoplasty. In group A, 65 % of the patients had a completely healed tympanic membrane postoperatively. Mean AB gap closure was 3.94 db. In underlay group B, 82.6% of the patients had a completely healed tympanic membrane postoperatively. Mean AB gap closure was 4.7 db. These outcomes show no statistically significant difference between both groups in terms of graft take and hearing improvement (p > 0.1). Conclusions Inlay butterfly myringoplasty is an easy, reliable, and time saving procedure that should be possible as a choice to underlay procedure. Results are comparable with underlay technique in terms of graft take rate and hearing improvement. Procedure is better regarding diminishing operative time, postoperative pain, and duration before resuming usual activities.

Butterfly Cartilage Tympanoplasty as an Alternative to Conventional Surgery for Tympanic Membrane Perforations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty (BCT) with that of conventional surgical approaches in the treatment of tympanic membrane perforations. Methods: A systematic search was performed by screening the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to October 31, 2020. Two coauthors independently identified studies in accordance with the selection criteria. Data were pooled and analyzed via Review Manager version 5.3 and Stata version 12.0 software. The postoperative outcomes were measured and expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs). Additionally, heterogeneity was assessed through the I2 statistic. Results: A total of 15 articles were eligible for final inclusion. The OR values for the graft uptake rate, compared to conventional tympanoplasty, were 1.12 (95%CI: 0.56-2.22, I2 = 52%, P = .75) and 1.22 (95%CI: 0.58-2.59, I2 = 0%, P = .60), and the OR compared to fat plug myringoplasty was 3.02 (95%CI: 1.04-8.77, I2 = 0%, P = .04). The qualitative analysis of the hearing results reflected significant postoperative auditory gains with no significant differences between the BCT and control groups, indicating satisfactory and similar postoperative hearing improvement. Moreover, the operation time was shortened (SMD = −2.19, 95%CI: −2.79 to −1.59, I2 = 82%, P < .05), and the postoperative pain was less with the BCT approach. Conclusion: Butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty has satisfactory efficacy in terms of anatomical and functional results in small to medium perforations. It reduces operation time and postoperative pain. However, the effectiveness on large perforation requires further assessment by well-designed studies.