scholarly journals Variations in Permeability and Porosity of Synthetic Oil Reservoir Rock-Methods of Control

1965 ◽  
Vol 5 (04) ◽  
pp. 329-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larman J. Heath

Abstract Synthetic rock with predictable porosity and permeability bas been prepared from mixtures of sand, cement and water. Three series of mixes were investigated primarily for the relation between porosity and permeability for certain grain sizes and proportions. Synthetic rock prepared of 65 per cent large grains, 27 per cent small grains and 8 per cent Portland cement, gave measurable results ranging in porosity from 22.5 to 40 per cent and in permeability from 0.1 darcies to 6 darcies. This variation in porosity and permeability was caused by varying the amount of blending water. Drainage- cycle relative permeability characteristics of the synthetic rock were similar to those of natural reservoir rock. Introduction The fundamental behavior characteristics of fluids flowing through porous media have been described in the literature. Practical application of these flow characteristics to field conditions is too complicated except where assumptions are overly simplified. The use of dimensionally scaled models to simulate oil reservoirs has been described in the literature. These and other papers have presented the theoretical and experimental justification for model design. Others have presented elements of model construction and their operation. In most investigations the porous media have consisted of either unconsolidated sand, glass beads, broken glass or plastic-impregnated granular substances-materials in which the flow behavior is not identical to that in natural reservoir rock. The relative permeability curves for unconsolidated sands differ from those for consolidated sandstone. The effect of saturation history on relative permeability measurements A discussed by Geffen, et al. Wygal has shown quite conclusively that a process of artificial cementation can be used to render unconsolidated packs into synthetic sandstones having properties similar to those of natural rock. Many theoretical and experimental studies have been made in attempts to determine the structure and properties of unconsolidated sand, the most notable being by Naar and Wygal. Others have theorized and experimented with the fundamental characteristics of reservoir rocks. This study was conducted to determine if some general relationship could be established between the size of sand grains and the porosity and permeability in consolidated binary packs. This paper presents the results obtained by changing some of the factors which affect the porosity and permeability of synthetically prepared sandstone. In addition, drainage relative permeability curves are presented. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE Mixtures of Portland cement with water and aggregate generally are designed to have certain characteristics, but essentially all are planned to be impervious to water or other liquids. Synthetic sandstone simulating oil reservoir rock, however, must be designed to have a given permeability (sometimes several darcies), a porosity which is primarily the effective porosity but quantitatively similar to natural rock, and other characteristics comparable to reservoir rock, such as wettability, pore geometry, tortuosity, etc. Unconsolidated ternary mixtures of spheres gave both a theoretically computed and an experimentally observed minimum porosity of about 25 per cent. By using a particle-distribution system, one-size particle packs had reproducible porosities in the reproducible range of 35 to 37 per cent. For model reservoir studies of the prototype system, a synthetic rock having a porosity of 25 per cent or less and a permeability of 2 darcies was required. The rock bad to be uniform and competent enough to handle. Synthetic sandstone cores mere prepared utilizing the technique developed by Wygal. Some tight variations in the procedure were incorporated. The sand was sieved through U.S. Standard sieves. SPEJ P. 329ˆ

1979 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 15-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.M. Sigmund ◽  
F.G. McCaffery

Abstract With typical heterogeneous carbonate coresamples, large uncertainties of unknown magnitudecan occur in the relative permeabilities derived using different methods. This situation can beimproved by analyzing the recovery and pressureresponse to two-phase laboratory displacement tests by a nonlinear least-squares procedure. Thesuggested technique fits the finite-differencesolution of the Buckley-Leverett two-phase flowequations(which include capillary pressure) to theobserved recovery and pressure data. The procedureis used to determine relative-permeability curves characterized by two parameters and their standarderrors for heterogeneous cores from two Albertacarbonate reservoirs. Introduction Several recent investigations have recognizedpossible problems when obtaining reliable two-phasedisplacement data from heterogeneous carbonate core samples. Huppler stated that waterfloodresults on cores with significant heterogeneitiescan be sensitive to flooding rate, core length, andwettability, and that these effects should beconsidered before applying the laboratory results atfield flooding rates. Brandner and Slotboomsuggested that realistic displacement results maynot be obtainable when vertically flooding aheterogeneous core with a nonwetting phase becauseof the fluid's inability to maintain a properdistribution when the sample length is less than the height of capillary rise. Ehrlich noted thatstandard relative-permeability measurement methodsusing core plugs cannot be applied when the media are heterogeneous. Archer and Wong reported that application of theconventional Johnson- Bossler - Neumann (JBN)methods for determining relative permeabilities froma waterflood test could give erroneous results forheterogeneous carbonate as well as for relativelyhomogeneous porous media having a mixed wettability (see Refs. 1, 6, and 7). The observedstepwise or humped shape of water relativepermeability curves mainly were attributed to theeffect of water breakthrough ahead of the main floodfront entering into the JBN calculation. Archer andWong suggested that such abnormally shapedrelative-permeability curves do not represent theproperties of the bulk of the core sample, and proposed the use of a reservoir simulator forinterpreting laboratory waterflood data. The work referred to above provides the majorbackground for this study involving the developmentof an improved unsteady-state test method tocharacterize the relative-permeability properties ofheterogeneous carbonate core samples. The methodcan be applied to all porous media, regardless ofthe size and distribution of the heterogeneities.However, the presence of large-scaleheterogeneities, especially in the form of vugs, fractures, and stratification, could cause the derivedrelative-permeability relations to be affected by viscosityratio and displacement rate. Remember also that extrapolation of any core test data to a field scaleis associated with many uncertainties, particularlyfor heterogeneous formations. The inclusion ofcapillary pressure effects permits the interpretationof displacement tests at reservoir rates. The proposed calculation procedure extends theapproach suggested by Archer and Wong in thatthe degree of fit between observed laboratory dataand simulator results is quantified. We suggest thatrelative-permeability curves for a variety of rocktypes can be expressed in terms of two adjustable parameters and their standard error estimates.To illustrate the method, the results of displacementtests performed on cores from Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake limestone oil reservoir and Rainbow F KegRiver dolomite oil reservoir are interpreted. SPEJ P. 15^


AIChE Journal ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 2472-2486 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. D. Tsakiroglou ◽  
M. A. Theodoropoulou ◽  
V. Karoutsos

1973 ◽  
Vol 13 (06) ◽  
pp. 343-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Archer ◽  
S.W. Wong

Abstract Relative permeability curves calculated from laboratory waterflood history by the method of Johnson, Bossler and Naumann (JBN) are often poorly defined or anomalous at low and intermediate poorly defined or anomalous at low and intermediate water saturations. Poor definition can be encountered with strongly water-wet homogeneous cores when the displacement is piston-like. Anomalous curve shapes are associated with laboratory-observed water breakthrough ahead of the main flood front and are common in cores that have contrasting permeability streaks. The JBN technique, although permeability streaks. The JBN technique, although valid for the conditions assumed in its development, is unsatisfactory for the conditions specified above. A reservoir simulator has been used to model laboratory tests and thereby provide an alternative interpretation procedure. The simulation uses core properties and trial-and-error relative permeabilities. properties and trial-and-error relative permeabilities. The shapes of the relative permeability curves are adjusted until calculated oil recovery and relative injectivity curves match those obtained from the laboratory displacement tests. The technique has been used successfully to obtain meaningful relative permeability curves for piston-like displacement, mixed wettability systems, piston-like displacement, mixed wettability systems, and heterogeneous carbonates. The technique has also been used in evaluating empirical equations for calculating relative permeability. Introduction Numerical reservoir simulators are finding increasing application in production history matching and performance predictions. Because of the degree of sophistication reached with these models, it is mandatory that the fluid flow properties be of the highest possible quality. Of all the rock and fluid properties required in predicting performance, it is properties required in predicting performance, it is often the relative permeability characteristics that are the most critically important. These data are usually obtained from laboratory waterflood tests using reservoir core samples. The laboratory waterflood test is an attempt to represent the linear displacement behavior of the oil/water/reservoir-rock system. The wettability properties of the rock system should be preserved properties of the rock system should be preserved in the laboratory core sample if reliable results are to be obtained. Furthermore, the viscosity ratio and surface tension of the oil/water system in the laboratory test should ideally be made the same as those in the reservoir. In interpreting laboratory waterflood tests the unsteady-state equations are usually solved by methods of Buckley-Leverett, Welge and Johnson, Bossler and Neumann (JBN). These interpretations are sometimes inadequate for defining relative permeability curves for heterogeneous reservoir permeability curves for heterogeneous reservoir rock systems or for water displacing a very light oil in a homogeneous sandstone. For example, a number of writers have observed anomalous changes in the relative permeability to water during the flooding of heterogeneous carbonate core samples. The relative permeability to water does not increase smoothly with increasing water saturation, but increases stepwise or even humps. Such behavior appears to reflect small-scale local heterogeneity in the core sample and is likely to be insignificant on a field scale. The heterogeneity is often indicated in the laboratory by an observed water breakthrough at the core-sample production face ahead of the main flood front. The time of water breakthrough is an important measurement used in the calculation of relative permeability by the JBN method. If the breakthrough permeability by the JBN method. If the breakthrough time observed is not that of the main flood front but is a little early, then the relative permeabilities calculated will not represent the properties of the bulk of the core sample. It is under these conditions that anomalous relative permeability curves usually occur. We suggest in this paper that, in many cases, the small changes in pressure and in oil and water production rate that accompany anomalous relative production rate that accompany anomalous relative permeability curves can be smoothed to reflect permeability curves can be smoothed to reflect properties more consistent with the bulk behavior properties more consistent with the bulk behavior of the core sample. In essence, we are saying that together the smoothed oil and water production history and the pressure history of the laboratory core sample represent a unique property of that sample. SPEJ P. 343


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document