An Integrated Geomechanics Workflow for Caprock-Integrity Analysis of a Potential Carbon Storage

Author(s):  
Safdar Khan ◽  
Hongxue Han ◽  
Sajjad Ahmed Ansari ◽  
Nader Khosravi
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (07) ◽  
pp. 01-11
Author(s):  
Souare Konsala ◽  
◽  
Froumsia Moksia ◽  
Baye-Niwah Claudette ◽  
Mogwo Tagne Helsa Wilfrande ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-216
Author(s):  
William R. Green ◽  
Patrick Taylor ◽  
Sven Treitel ◽  
Moritz Fliedner

Geophysics and Geosequestration, edited by Thomas L. Davis, Martin Landr⊘, and Malcolm Wilson, ISBN 978-1-107-13749-3, 2019, Cambridge University Press, 388 p. Geological Carbon Storage: Subsurface Seals and Caprock Integrity, edited by Stéphanie Vialle, Jonathan Ajo-Franklin, and J. William Carey, ISBN 978-1-119-11864-0, 2018, American Geophysical Union and Wiley, 364 p. Introduction to Deep Learning, by Eugene Charniak, ISBN 978-0-262-03951-2, 2019, MIT Press, 192 p. Foundations of Machine Learning, second edition, by Mehryar Mohri, Afshin Rostamizadeh, and Ameet Talwalkar, ISBN 978-0-262-03940-6, 2018, MIT Press, 504 p. Seismic Ambient Noise, edited by Nori Nakata, Lucia Gualtieri, and Andreas Fichtner, ISBN 978-1-108-41708-2, 2019, Cambridge University Press, 370 p.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Syareena Mohd Ali ◽  
W. Ahmad Rafael W. Zairudin ◽  
Zainol Affendi Abu Bakar ◽  
Budi Priyatna Kantaatmadja ◽  
Issham Ismail

2014 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 86-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongxiao Liu ◽  
Hai Ren ◽  
Dafeng Hui ◽  
Wenqing Wang ◽  
Baowen Liao ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn D. Taylor ◽  
Sergio Marconi

AbstractKey MessageBastin et al. 2019 used flawed assumptions in calculating the carbon storage of restored forests worldwide, resulting in a gross overestimate.ContextBastin et al. 2019 use two flawed assumptions: 1) that the area suitable for restoration does not contain any carbon currently, and 2) that soil organic carbon (SOC) from increased canopy cover will accumulate quickly enough to mitigate anthropogenic carbon emissions.AimsWe re-evaluated the potential carbon storage worldwide using empirical relationships of tree cover and carbon.Methods and ResultsWe use global datasets of tree cover, soil organic carbon, and above ground biomass to estimate the empirical relationships of tree cover and carbon stock storage. A more realistic range of global carbon storage potential is between 71.7 and 75.7 GtC globally, with a large uncertainty associated with SOC. This is less than half of the original 205 GtC estimate.ConclusionThe potential global carbon storage of restored forests is much less than that estimated by Bastin et al. 2019. While we agree on the value of assessing global reforestation potential, we suggest caution in considering it the most effective strategy to mitigate anthropogenic emissions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document