scholarly journals Second-line chemotherapy using taxane in patients with advanced gastric cancer who presented with severe peritoneal metastasis: A multicenter retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Arai ◽  
Masahiro Kawahira ◽  
Hirofumi Yasui ◽  
Toshiki Masuishi ◽  
Kei Muro ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Individuals with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who present with severe peritoneal metastasis (SPM) have poor prognosis, and the need to improve treatment for such condition and survival time is not met. Moreover, there are only few data about the second-line treatment for patients with such condition. Methods This retrospective study included patients receiving taxane-based second-line chemotherapy at three institutions in Japan between 2010 and 2016. Patients with AGC who present with SPM were included if they had massive ascites and/or inadequate oral intake requiring intravenous nutritional support. The efficacy and safety of the treatment were evaluated. Results In the present study, 43 (40%) of 108 patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score > 2, and the median serum albumin level of the patients was 3.3 g/mL. Ramucirumab was used in combination with paclitaxel in 21 patients. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 5.1 and 2.8 months, respectively. Inadequate oral intake was considered a negative prognostic factor of both OS and PFS in the multivariate analysis. Three treatment-related deaths were observed, which include those attributed to febrile neutropenia, gastrointestinal perforation, and pneumonitis. Common grade > 3 adverse events were neutropenia (35%), leukopenia (30%), anemia (24%), and anorexia (16%). We observed febrile neutropenia in 8% and gastrointestinal perforation in 4% of patients, and such conditions were primarily observed in patients with inadequate oral intake. Conclusions Taxane-based second-line chemotherapy was effective and safe for patients with AGC who present with SPM. Attention must be provided when treating patients with inadequate oral intake as they are likely to have short prognosis and serious toxicities.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaaki Arigami ◽  
Daisuke Matsushita ◽  
Keishi Okubo ◽  
Takako Tanaka ◽  
Ken Sasaki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2018 have recommended first- to third-line treatment regimens after nivolumab approval for unresectable advanced gastric cancer. However, the clinical impact of chemotherapeutic changes, including post-progression chemotherapy (PPC), remains unclear. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate changes in PPC before and after nivolumab approval and determine their prognostic impact.Methods: A total of 146 patients with unresectable gastric cancer who had at least progressive disease after first- and/or second-line chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. All patients were divided into two groups based on the nivolumab approval period.Results: Among the 146 patients, 46 and 23 received ramucirumab and nivolumab, respectively. Moreover, 95 and 62 patients received PPC after first- and second-line chemotherapy, respectively. Group B (i.e., at least chemotherapy after nivolumab approval) had significantly higher proportions of patients receiving ramucirumab therapy, nivolumab therapy, and PPC after first- or second-line chemotherapy compared to group A (i.e., termination of chemotherapy before nivolumab approval) (all p < 0.0001). Group A had significantly poorer prognosis than group B (p = 0.0002). Multivariate analysis showed that age (< 70 vs. ³ 70), number of distant metastatic sites (1 vs. ³ 2), and ramucirumab therapy were independent prognostic factors (p = 0.0252, p = 0.0036, and p = 0.0076, respectively).Conclusion: Our retrospective study demonstrated that changes in chemotherapeutic strategy might contribute to improved prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. vii132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Arai ◽  
Shuichi Hironaka ◽  
Takuto Suzuki ◽  
Kentaro Sudo ◽  
Kazuyoshi Nakamura ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fukuto Maruta ◽  
Satoshi Ishizone ◽  
Manabu Hiraguri ◽  
Yoshiro Fujimori ◽  
Fumiaki Shimizu ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 148-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Kyoung Jeon ◽  
Sook Hee Hong ◽  
Tae Hee Kim ◽  
Seung Eun Jung ◽  
Ji Chan Park ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document