scholarly journals Comparison between bundled multi-segment rib graft and titanium mesh bone graft in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yifan Wang ◽  
Shiyuan Shi ◽  
Qi Zheng ◽  
Mingfeng Zheng ◽  
Yanghui Jin
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Titanium Mesh ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Abstract Background: To investigate the two different methods including bone grafting with bundled multi-segment ribs and titanium mesh bone grafting through posterior approach in patients with thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis. Methods: 38 patients with thoracic spinal tuberculosis in our hospital were divided into group A (19 cases of titanium mesh bone grafting) and group B (19 cases of bone grafting with bundled multi-segment ribs). The transverse costal process approach was firstly initiated, then the necrotic tissue of tuberculosis lesions was removed thoroughly. Finally, titanium mesh bone grafting and bone grafting with bundled multi-segment ribs was applied, respectively. Results: The data demonstrated that 12 to 24 months of follow-up revealed that the operation time of Titanium mesh bone grafting in group A was 21.2+2.3 min, and that of bundled rib bone grafting in group B was 7.2+2.4 min. Compared to group A, the time in group B was significantly shorter. The amount of bleeding in group A not distinct from that in group B. There was no significant difference in Cobb angle. The fusion time in the two groups was similar. There was no significant difference in Oswestry dysfunction index between the two groups at the last follow-up. Conclusions: Bone grafting with bundled multi-segment ribs could stable the function quickly after thoracic tuberculosis lesion clearance, indicating as an alternative and development prospects of bone graft strategy.

scholarly journals Comparison of single posterior debridement, bone grafting, and instrumentation with single anterior debridement, bone grafting, and instrumentation in treatment of thoracic spinal tuberculosis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongchun Zhou ◽  
Weiwei Li ◽  
Liqun Gong ◽  
Jiao Zhou ◽  
Jing Luo
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Anterior Debridement ◽  
Thoracic Spinal ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Posterior Debridement ◽  
Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis

Abstract Objective To explore the clinical effect of single posterior debridement, bone grafting, and instrumentation and single anterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation in the treatment of thoracic spinal tuberculosis of adult patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made by involving 38 adult patients with thoracic spinal tuberculosis from between June 2013 and December 2015. Of the 38 patients, 21 patients were categorized in single anterior approach group and underwent single posterior debridement, bone grafting, and instrumentation (Group A). The remaining 17 patients were classified in single posterior approaches group (Group B), which received single posterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation. Clinical manifestations, laboratory and imaging results of the two groups were analyzed subsequently. Results: All patients were followed up for 23.9 ± 3.8 m (range, 19–36 m). Bony fusion was achieved in all bone grafts. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in group B were significantly less than those in group A (P<0.05). The VAS scores, ESR, and CRP levels 6 weeks after operation and at the final follow-up were significantly lower than the preoperative levels (P<0.05). At the last follow-up, ASIA improvement no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). Furthermore, the postoperative and final-follow-up kyphosis angles in group B were both significantly smaller than those in group A (P<0.05). Group A had a postoperative angle correction rate smaller than group B, and its postoperative angle loss was greater than group B’s (P<0.05). Conclusion: Single posterior debridement, bone grafting, and instrumentation can achieve similar curative effect as single anterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation in the treatment of thoracic spinal tuberculosis, but also accompanied by additional advantages of shorter operation time and less bleeding .

scholarly journals Clinical Effect of Suture Anchor and Double-Pulley Technique in the Treatment of Inferior Patellar Fracture

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hang Yu ◽  
Hui Dong ◽  
Binjia Ruan ◽  
Xiaohang Xu ◽  
Yongxiang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Healing ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Alternative Therapy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Clinical Healing

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of suture anchor combined with double-pulley technique for subpatellar comminuted fractures compared with wire vertical suture and Krachow in the treatment of subpatellar fractures. Methods. Retrospectively selected 48 patients with subpatellar pole comminuted fracture admitted in our hospital from February 2013 to July 2019, 25 patients with double-pulley technique (group A), and 23 patients with vertical wire suture with Krachow suture. Patient age, gender, AT/OTA typing, injury mechanism, follow-up time, surgical time, bleeding volume, mean fracture healing time, and postoperative complications were recorded. The Insall-Salvati index immediately and 6 weeks after surgery. Bostman scores and knee activity were recorded at each follow-up, and month 12 was taken as the final result. Results. Time of surgery in group A (46.52 min) was significantly shorter than in group B (76.30 min). Intraoperative bleeding in group 15.1 ml, B, group 15.9 ml. Both incisions healed in stage I, averaging clinical healing of patella fracture within 10 weeks. There was no significant difference in mean Bostman score and knee activity at month 12 (group A: 28.4, 124.8°; group B: 28.1, 125.7°). There was no significant statistical difference in the Insall-Salvati index immediately or 6 weeks between the two groups. Group B patients had two wire fractures, fracture healing and the wire removed one year after surgery, and the remaining patients had no complications such as internal fixation loosening, fracture, delayed healing, or nonhealing of fracture. Conclusion. Compared with the treatment of subpatellar fracture with wire vertical suture and Krachow method, suture anchor with double-pulley technique has short operation time, reliable fixation, and less complications. Patients can have early functional exercise and good knee function recovery without secondary surgery. It can be considered as an alternative therapy for this fracture and deserves clinical adoption and promotion.

scholarly journals A Modified Method to Treat Severe Asymptomatic Pre-existing Degeneration of Adjacent Segment: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinliang Zhang ◽  
Jinwen Zhu ◽  
Yibing Li ◽  
Dingjun Hao ◽  
Wenjie Gao
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Modified Method ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background: Pre-existing degeneration of adjacent segment is an important risk factor for adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), but limited and controversial studies have addressed its management.Methods: Patients with symptomatic degeneration of the L5/S1 segment warranting surgical interference and severe asymptomatic degeneration of the L4/5 segment were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, those who underwent interbody fusion in the causative (L5/S1) segment and distraction of the intervertebral space and facet fusion in the adjacent L4/5 segment were included as Group A (n=103). Patients who underwent interbody fusion in both L5/S1 and L4/5 segments were included as Group B (n=81). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated.Results: Mean follow-up was 58.5 months (range, 48-75 m). No significant difference in clinical outcomes or the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in L3/4 segment was found between Groups A and B. Compared with Group B, less bleeding (315±84 vs. 532±105 ml), shorter operation time (107±34 vs. 158±55 min) and lower costs (13,830±2640 vs. 16,020±3380 US$) were found in Group A (P<0.05). In Group A, disc height ratio (DHR) of L4/5 segment was significantly increased from preoperative value of 0.40±0.13 to last follow-up value of 0.53±0.18 (P<0.05), while the degree of canal stenosis (DCS) was decreased from preoperative value of 34.3±11.2% to last follow-up value of 15.9±9.3% (P<0.05). Conclusions: This modified method could be effective in treating severe asymptomatic pre-existing degeneration of adjacent segment in lumbar spine.

scholarly journals A Comparison of the Bridge-type ROI-C Interbody Fusion Cage System and Titanium Mesh Graft With Titanium Plate Fixation in 2-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plating and Cage System: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangjun He ◽  
Zhangzhe Zhou ◽  
Xiaofeng Shao ◽  
Changhao Zhang ◽  
Xinfeng Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Cage System ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Bridge Type ◽  
Group B ◽  
Fusion Cage

Abstract Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and radioactive results of the bridge-type ROI-C interbody fusion cage (ROI-C) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating and cage system (ACDF) for cervical spondylopathy. Methods From January 2014 to January 2018, 45 patients undergoing ACDF were retrospectively analyzed, including 24 cases of ROI-C (group A) and 21 cases of ACDF (group B). The operation time, blood loss, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA), postoperative complications, imaging results including cervical Cobb angle and fusion were compared between groups. Results All patients were successfully treated with surgery, and no cerebrospinal fluid leakage, esophageal fistula, or hoarseness occurred after surgery. The operation time and blood loss in group A were lower than those in group B (P < 0.05). During the follow-up period, JOA score increased and NDI score decreased after operation (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of dysphagia in group A was lower than that in group B at 1 month and 3 months after operation (P < 0.05), but the final follow-up results showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of dysphagia between the two groups (P > 0.05). In group A, the fusion rate was 83.3% 3 months after surgery and 100% at the last follow-up. The rate of adjacent level ossification development was 12.5%. In group B, the fusion rate was 85.7% 3 months after surgery and 100% at the last follow-up. The rate of adjacent level ossification development was 23.8%. Conclusion Both ROI-C and ACDF can achieve satisfactory results, but ROI-C has shorter operation time, less bleeding and lower incidence of dysphagia in the short term.

scholarly journals A modified method to treat severe asymptomatic pre‐existing degeneration of adjacent segment: a retrospective case‐control study

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinliang Zhang ◽  
Jinwen Zhu ◽  
Yibing Li ◽  
Dingjun Hao ◽  
Wenjie Gao
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Modified Method ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background Pre-existing degeneration of adjacent segment is an important risk factor for adjacent-segment degeneration (ASD), but only limited and controversial studies have addressed its management. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients with symptomatic degeneration of the L5/S1 segment warranting surgical interference and severe asymptomatic degeneration of the L4/5 segment. Of these patients, those who underwent interbody fusion of the causative (L5/S1) segment and distraction of the intervertebral space and facet fusion of the adjacent L4/5 segment were included in Group A (n = 103), while those who underwent interbody fusion of both the L5/S1 and L4/5 segments were included in Group B (n = 81). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated. Results Mean follow-up time was 58.5 months (range, 48–75 months). We found no significant difference in clinical outcomes or incidence of ASD in the L3/4 segment between Groups A and B. Compared with Group B, Group A experienced less bleeding (315 ± 84 ml vs. 532 ± 105 ml), shorter operation time (107 ± 34 min vs. 158 ± 55 min) and lower costs (US $13,830 ± $2640 vs. US $16,020 ± $3380; P < 0.05). In Group A, the disc height ratio (DHR) of the L4/5 segment was significantly increased from a preoperative value of 0.40 ± 0.13 to a last–follow-up value of 0.53 ± 0.18 (P < 0.05), while the degree of canal stenosis (DCS) was decreased from a preoperative value of 34.3 ± 11.2% to a last–follow-up value of 15.9 ± 9.3 % (P < 0.05). Conclusions This modified method could be effective in treating severe asymptomatic pre-existing degeneration of adjacent segment in the lumbar spine.

scholarly journals Surgical management of consecutive multisegment thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis: anterior-only approach vs. posterior-only approach.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Zhao ◽  
Lei Luo ◽  
Liehua Liu ◽  
Pei Li ◽  
Lichuan Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Loss Rate ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Surgery Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Purpose: To compare the efficacy, safety, and technical characteristics of anterior-only and posterior-only approach surgeries for the treatment of consecutive multisegment thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis.Methods: Thirty-five patients who developed consecutive multisegment thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis from September 2012 to May 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Group A was the posterior-only surgery group, and group B was the anterior-only surgery group. The data on the surgery, deformity correction, functional scores and complications were compared between the two groups.Results: There was no significant difference in the operation time or blood loss between groups A and B (P>0.05). The preoperative average Cobb angle of kyphosis in groups A and B were 36.2±15.2° and 27.9±7.7°, respectively, which significantly decreased to 4.9±11.8° and 10.4±5.6° after the operation, respectively (P<0.05). At the final follow-up, the angles were 7.1±10.5° and 14.6±8.0°, respectively. The correction angle and correction rate in group A (31.3±16.6°, 88.6±43.6%) were greater than those in group B (17.5±4.4°, 64.9±14.0%) (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the loss angle between groups A and B (P>0.05), but the loss rate in group B (24.0±27.8%) was higher than that in group A (9.6±10.2%) (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: The posterior-only and anterior-only approaches can lead to satisfactory clinical results in the treatment of patients with consecutive multisegment thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis. With posterior-only surgery, kyphosis can be better corrected, and the correction can be better maintained than with anterior-only surgery.

scholarly journals Spinous Process Combined with a Titanium Mesh Cage as a Bone Graft in the Stability Reconstruction of Lumbar or Lumbosacral Spinal Tuberculosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongqi Zhang ◽  
Lige Xiao ◽  
mingxing Tang ◽  
Guanteng Yang
Keyword(s):  
Operative Time ◽  
Spinous Process ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Titanium Mesh ◽  
Bony Fusion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Posterior Debridement

Abstract Background. To investigate the clinical efficacy of one-stage posterior debridement using the spinous process (SP) combined with titanium mesh cages (TMCs) as interbody grafts for the treatment of single-segment lumbar or lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis.Methods. From 2010 to 2018, 69 patients who underwent one-stage posterior debridement using grafts and internal fixation within a single lumbar or lumbosacral segment were included in this study. 12 cases using the SP combined with a TMC (SP+TMC, group A), 30 cases using a TMC only (group B), and 27 cases using allografts (group C) were included. Measurements including operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment (ASIA) grade, final follow-up (FFU) duration and postoperative complications were recorded. Radiological measurements, including the number of segments fixated, the number of pedicle screws used, the Cobb angle, pelvic parameters, and the bony fusion time, were reviewed. All outcomes were analysed using SPSS 25.Results. We found that group A had fewer fixation segments (1.67±0.64 vs 2.81±0.94, pAC<0.01), fewer pedicle screws implanted (5.05±1.29 vs 6.85±1.37, pAC<0.01), a shorter operative time (166.43±44.11 min vs 205.93±51.73 min, pAC<0.01), reduced blood loss (543.81±230.81 ml vs 803.70±446.78 ml, pAC<0.01), and a strikingly lower hospital cost (14710.42±2354.55$ vs 19260.34±3310.75$, pAC<0.01) than group C.Compared to group B, group A had a lower economic cost (16680.23±3614.73$ vs 14710.42±2354.55$, pAB=0.03). There was no significant difference in bony fusion time among the three groups (8.90 ±2.11 months vs 8.60±2.39 months vs 9.59 ±2.04 months, p>0.01). No significant difference was observed with respect to pre- or postoperative ESR and CRP (p>0.01). There was no significant difference among the 3 groups with respect to the ODI, VAS score or ASIA grade during any period. No differences regarding the hospital stay, rate of complications, loss of PI-LL, correction or loss of Cobb angle were observed among the three groups (p>0.01).Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that compared to a TMC or allograft, the use of the SP combined with a TMC as a bone graft is an effective and reliable approach for the surgical management of one-level lumbar or lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis, leading to good restoration of spinal stability. Furthermore, this approach is an economical structural bone grafting method, especially for patients in developing countries or areas.

scholarly journals Comparison of Three Interbody Fusion Methods Through Posterior Approach for Lower Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis in Adults: a Study of Mid-Long Term Follow-Up

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenchao Xu ◽  
Xiyang Wang ◽  
Zheng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Allogeneic Bone ◽  
Mesh Cage ◽  
Group B ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Lower Lumbar

Abstract Background: This study was conducted to compare mid-long term outcomes of three interbody fusion methods by way of posterior approach in adults with lower lumbar spinal tuberculosis. Methods: A total of 126 lower lumbar spinal tuberculosis patients were treated by one-stage posterior debridement, interbody fusion, and instrumentation. Of the three types of interbody bone grafts, 41 patients (group A) were treated with autogenous bone graft for interbody fusion , 45 patients (group B) were treated with allogeneic bone grafting, and the remaining 40 (group C) patients were treated with titanium mesh cage. Clinical and radiographic data were gathered and analyzed. Results: At the final follow-up, all patients were found to be completely cured. Neurological performance and quality of life were remarkably improved compared with those preoperative at the final follow-up. The preoperative lordosis angles of the three groups were significantly corrected compared with postoperative immediately values or those evaluated at the final follow-up. The correction loss of the group C was lower than those of groups A and B. All the patients obtained bone graft fusion; the fusion period of group B was longer than that of the other two groups. No significant differences among the three groups in adjacent segment degeneration rate were found at the last visit. Conclusions: This mid-long term follow-up study established that one-stage posterior debridement, interbody fusion, and instrumentation can effectively treat lower lumbar spinal tuberculosis. Moreover, intervertebral titanium mesh cage bone graft may provide better outcomes than autogenous or allogeneic bone graft.

scholarly journals Non Traumatic Hip Osteonecrosis Treated By Non Vascularised Bone Graft Versus Core Decompression

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-55
Author(s):  
Dhary F. Hassan ◽  
Ghadeer H. Majeed ◽  
Abed Falih Al-Sudani
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Bone Graft ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Core Decompression ◽  
Cancellous Bone Graft ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Vascularized Bone

Background: Avascular necrosis (AVN) is defined as cellular death of bone components due to interruption of the blood supply; the bone structures then collapse, resulting in bone destruction, pain, and loss of joint function. AVN is associated with numerous conditions and usually involves the epiphysis of long bones, such as the femoral head. In clinical practice, AVN is most commonly encountered in the hip. Early diagnosis and appropriate intervention can delay the need for joint replacement. However, most patients present late in the disease course. Without treatment, the process is almost always progressive, leading to joint destruction within 5 years.Treatment of a vascular necrosis depends mainly on early diagnosis which mainly based on clinical findings, x-ray finding & MRI.A variety of non vascularized bone grafting techniques have been proposed with varying degrees of success as treatment alternatives for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. The success of these procedures may be enhanced using ancillary growth and differentiation factors. Objectives: To treat non traumatic hip osteonecrosis by non vascularized bone graft versus core decompression. Type of the study: A retrospective study. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 72 patients (88 hips) with osteonecrosis of the femoral head between May 2009, and March 2014,divided into two groups . Group A include 34 patients (44 hips) with osteonecrosis of the femoral head who had non vascularized bone grafting procedures done for them . Minimum follow-up was 12 months. We compared the outcomes in this cohort to similar hip number (44 hips) in 40 patients treated with core decompression only (group B). We used Phemister technique to make a window at the posterior aspect of greater trochanter to remove necrotic bone and packed the excavated area with autogenous cancellous bone graft taken from ipsilateral iliac crest or leave it without bone graft (decompression only). Results: We report the result of treatment for femoral head avascular necrosis depending on Ficat classification stage I, II, & III. The minimum follow up was 12 months (12m-36m). The success percentage of hips in our cohort of patients with non vascularized bone grafting group A are 86% (38 of 44 hips), which is higher than group B 63% (28 of 44 hips) with core decompression alone. Conclusions: These procedures core decompression and autogenous cancellous bone graft may defer joint arthroplasty in selected patients & it is more effective than core decompression alone in treating early stages of femoral head osteonecrosis.

scholarly journals A Comparison Of The Bridge-Type Roi-c Interbody Fusion Cage System And Titanium Mesh Graft With Titanium Plate Fixation In 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion With Plating And Cage System: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangjun He ◽  
Zhangzhe Zhou ◽  
Xiaofeng Shao ◽  
Changhao Zhang ◽  
Xinfeng Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Cage System ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Bridge Type ◽  
Group B ◽  
Fusion Cage

Abstract Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy and radioactive results of the bridge-type ROI-C interbody fusion cage (ROI-C) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating and cage system (ACDF) for cervical spondylopathy.Methods: From January 2014 to January 2018, 45 patients undergoing ACDF were retrospectively analyzed, including 24 cases of ROI-C (group A) and 21 cases of ACDF (group B). The operation time, blood loss, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA), postoperative complications, imaging results including cervical Cobb angle and fusion were compared between groups.Results: All patients were successfully treated with surgery, and no cerebrospinal fluid leakage, esophageal fistula, or hoarseness occurred after surgery. The operation time and blood loss in group A were lower than those in group B (P<0.05). During the follow-up period, JOA score increased and NDI score decreased after operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). The incidence of dysphagia in group A was lower than that in group B at 1 month and 3 months after operation (P<0.05), but the final follow-up results showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of dysphagia between the two groups (P>0.05). In group A, the fusion rate was 83.3% 3 months after surgery and 100% at the last follow-up. The rate of adjacent level ossification development was 12.5%. In group B, the fusion rate was 85.7% 3 months after surgery and 100% at the last follow-up. The rate of adjacent level ossification development was 23.8%.Conclusion: Both ROI-C and ACDF can achieve satisfactory results, but ROI-C has shorter operation time, less bleeding and lower incidence of dysphagia in the short term.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document